CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationPolitical Science Research and EducationPolitical Theory and Democracy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

POLITICAL REPRESENTATION IN COMPARATIVE POLITICS

Open access
Powell, G. Bingham·2004·xxxx
DOI 10.50505/nlmtest4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.50505/nlmtest4

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 89

  1. Achen, 1977, Measuring representation: perils of the correlation coefficient, Am. J. Polit. Sci., 21, 805, 10.2307/2110737 · DOI
  2. Achen, 1978, Measuring representation, Am. J. Polit. Sci., 22, 477, 10.2307/2110458 · DOI
  3. Aldrich, 1995, Why Parties?, 10.7208/chicago/9780226012773.001.0001 · DOI
  4. Barnes, 1977, Representation in Italy: Institutionalized Tradition and Electoral Choice
  5. Blais, 1987, The impact of electoral formulae on the creation of majority governments, Elect. Stud., 6, 209, 10.1016/0261-3794(87)90032-1 · DOI
  6. Benoit, 2001, District magnitude, electoral formula and the number of parties, Eur. J. Polit. Res., 39, 203, 10.1111/1475-6765.00575 · DOI
  7. Bryce, 1921, Modern Democracies
  8. Cheibub, 1999, Democracy, elections and accountability for election outcomes, 222, 10.1017/CBO9781139175104.008 · DOI
  9. Converse, 1986, Political Representation in France, 10.4159/harvard.9780674187887 · DOI
  10. Cox, 1991, SNTV and d'Hondt are “equivalent.”, Elect. Stud., 10, 118, 10.1016/0261-3794(91)90043-R · DOI
  11. Cox, 1991, Comment on Gallagher's “Proportionality, disproportionality and electoral systems.”, Elect. Stud., 10, 348, 10.1016/0261-3794(91)90025-N · DOI
  12. Dahl, 1989, Democracy and Its Critics
  13. Dalton, 1985, Political parties and political representation: party supporters and party elites in nine nations, Comp. Polit. Stud., 18, 267, 10.1177/0010414085018003001 · DOI
  14. Downs, 1957, An Economic Theory of Democracy
  15. Duverger, 1954, Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State
  16. Esaiasson, 2000, Beyond Westminster and Congress: The Nordic Experience
  17. Esaisson, 1996, Representation from Above: Members of Parliament and Representative Democracy in Sweden
  18. Farah, 1980, Political representation in West Germany: the institution and maintenance of mass-elite linkages
  19. Gallagher, 1991, Proportionality, disproportionality, and electoral systems, Elect. Stud., 10, 33, 10.1016/0261-3794(91)90004-C · DOI
  20. Gallagher, 1992, Comparing proportional representational electoral systems: quotas, thresholds, paradoxes and majorities, Br. J. Polit. Sci., 22, 469, 10.1017/S0007123400006499 · DOI
  21. Gelman, 1994, Enhancing democracy through legislative redistricting, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., 88, 541, 10.2307/2944794 · DOI
  22. Gibbard, 1973, Manipulation of voting schemes: a general result, Econometrica, 41, 587, 10.2307/1914083 · DOI
  23. Granberg, 1988, The Political System Matters: Social Psychology and Voting Behavior in Sweden and the United States
  24. Grofman, 1983, The measures of bias and proportionality in seats-votes relationships, Polit. Methodol., 9, 295
  25. Grofman, 1986, Election Laws and Their Political Consequences
  26. Gudgin, 1979, Seats, Votes and the Spatial Organization of Elections
  27. Holmberg, 1997, Dynamic opinion representation, Scand. Polit. Stud., 20, 265, 10.1111/j.1467-9477.1997.tb00195.x · DOI
  28. Holmberg, 1989, Political representation in Sweden, Scand. Polit. Stud., 12, 1, 10.1111/j.1467-9477.1989.tb00079.x · DOI
  29. Imbeau, 2001, Left-right party ideology and government policies: a meta analysis, Eur. J. Polit. Res., 40, 1, 10.1111/1475-6765.00587 · DOI
  30. Irwin, 1975, Issue-consensus in a multi-party system: voters and leaders in the Netherlands, Acta Polit., 10, 389
  31. Johnston, 1994, The geography of voting: regions and the declining importance of the cube law, 255
  32. Johnston, 1999, Integrating and decomposing the sources of partisan bias: Brookes' method and the impact of redistricting in Great Britain, Elect. Stud., 18, 367, 10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00005-0 · DOI
  33. Katz, 1997, Democracy and Elections, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195044294.001.0001 · DOI
  34. Kitschelt, 1989, The internal politics of parties, Polit. Stud., 37, 400, 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1989.tb00279.x · DOI
  35. Kitschelt, 1994, The Transformation of European Social Democracy, 10.1017/CBO9780511622014 · DOI
  36. Kitschelt, 2000, Linkages between citizens and politicians in democratic polities, Comp. Polit. Stud., 33, 845, 10.1177/001041400003300607 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Klingemann, 1994, Parties, Policies and Democracy
  38. Kuhn, 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
  39. Lakatos, 1978, The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, 10.1017/CBO9780511621123 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Leys, 1959, Models, theories and the theory of political parties, Polit. Stud., 7, 127, 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1959.tb01896.x · DOI
  41. Lijphart, 1985, The field of electoral systems research: a critical survey, Elect. Stud., 4, 3, 10.1016/0261-3794(85)90028-9 · DOI
  42. Lijphart, 1990, The political consequences of electoral laws, 1945–85, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., 84, 481, 10.2307/1963530 · DOI
  43. Lijphart, 1994, Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198273479.001.0001 · DOI
  44. Lijphart, 1977, Thresholds and payoffs in list systems of proportional representation, Eur. J. Polit. Res., 5, 219, 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1977.tb01289.x · DOI
  45. Loosemore, 1971, The theoretical limits of maximum distortion, Br. J. Polit. Sci., 1, 467, 10.1017/S000712340000925X · DOI
  46. Manion, 1996, The electoral connection in the Chinese countryside, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., 90, 736, 10.2307/2945839 · DOI
  47. Matthews, 1999, Parliamentary Representation: The Case of the Norwegian Storting
  48. May, 1973, Opinion structure of political parties: the special law of curvilinear disparity, Polit. Stud., 21, 136, 10.1111/j.1467-9248.1973.tb01423.x · DOI
  49. McAllister, 1991, Party elites, voters and political attitudes: testing three explanations of mass-elite differences, Can. J. Polit. Sci., 24, 237, 10.1017/S0008423900005072 · DOI
  50. Mill, 1958 (1861), Considerations on Representative Government
  51. Miller, 2000, Emerging party systems in post-Soviet societies: fact or fiction?, J. Polit., 62, 455, 10.1111/0022-3816.00021 · DOI
  52. Miller, 1999, Policy Representation in Western Democracies, 10.1093/oso/9780198295709.001.0001 · DOI
  53. Miller, 1963, Constituency influence in Congress, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., 57, 165, 10.2307/1952717 · DOI
  54. Moser, 1999, Electoral systems and the number of parties in postcommunist states, World Polit., 51, 359, 10.1017/S0043887100009114 · DOI
  55. Norris, 1995, May's law of curvilinear disparity revisited, Party Polit., 1, 29, 10.1177/1354068895001001002 · DOI
  56. Norris, 1996, Legislative recruitment, 184
  57. Ordeshook, 1994, Ethnic heterogeneity, district magnitude, and the number of parties, Am. J. Polit. Sci., 38, 100, 10.2307/2111337 · DOI
  58. Pierce, 1999, Mass-elite issue linkages and the responsible party model of representation, 9, 10.1093/oso/9780198295709.003.0002 · DOI
  59. Pinto-Duschinsky, 1998, Send the rascals packing: defects of proportional representation and the virtues of the Westminster model, Times Lit. Suppl.,, 10
  60. Porter, 1995, Political representation in Germany: effects of candidate selection committees
  61. Powell, 1982, Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability and Violence, 10.4159/9780674042353 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Powell, 2000, Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions
  63. Powell, 1978, The analysis of citizen-elite linkages: representation by Austrian local elites, 197
  64. Powell, 2000, Election laws, disproportionality and the left-right dimension, Br. J. Polit. Sci., 30, 383
  65. Powell, 1993, A cross-national analysis of economic voting: taking account of political context, Am. J. Polit. Sci., 37, 391, 10.2307/2111378 · DOI
  66. Powell, 1982, Issue representation in Congress, J. Polit., 44, 658, 10.2307/2130512 · DOI
  67. Przeworski, 1999, Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, 10.1017/CBO9781139175104 · DOI
  68. Rae, 1967, 1971, The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws
  69. Royed, 1996, Testing the mandate model in Britain and the United States, Br. J. Polit. Sci., 26, 45, 10.1017/S0007123400007419 · DOI
  70. Sartori, 1968, Political development and political engineering
  71. Satterthwaite, 1975, Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions, J. Econ. Theory, 10, 1, 10.1016/0022-0531(75)90050-2 · DOI
  72. Schattschneider, 1942, Party Government
  73. Schmitt, 1999, Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union, 10.1093/0198296614.001.0001 · DOI
  74. Shugart, 1995, The electoral cycle and institutional sources of divided presidential government, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., 89, 327, 10.2307/2082428 · DOI
  75. Shugart, 1992, Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics, 10.1017/CBO9781139173988 · DOI
  76. Shugart, 2001, Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?
  77. Snyder, 2001, Devaluing the vote, J. Democr., 12, 146, 10.1353/jod.2001.0016 · DOI
  78. Taagepera, 1986, Reformulating the cube law for proportional representation elections, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., 80, 489, 10.2307/1958270 · DOI
  79. Taagepera, 1989, Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems
  80. Taylor, 1979, The Geography of Elections
  81. Taylor, 1985, Proportional tenure vs. proportional representation, Eur. J. Polit. Res., 13, 387, 10.1111/j.1475-6765.1985.tb00134.x · DOI
  82. Thomassen, 1994, Empirical research into political representation, 237
  83. Thomassen, 1997, Policy representation, Eur. J. Polit. Res., 32, 165, 10.1111/1475-6765.00337 · DOI
  84. Thomson, 2001, The programme to policy linkage: the fulfillment of election pledges on socio-economic policy in the Netherlands, 1986–1998, Eur. J. Polit. Res., 40, 171, 10.1111/1475-6765.00595 · DOI
  85. Tufte, 1973, The relationship between seats and votes in two-party systems, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., 67, 540, 10.2307/1958782 · DOI
  86. Vowles, 1998, Voters' Victory? New Zealand's First Election Under Proportional Representation
  87. Vowles, 1995, Towards Consensus? The 1993 Election in New Zealand and the Transition to Proportional Representation
  88. Weissberg, 1978, Collective versus dyadic representation in Congress, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., 72, 535, 10.2307/1954109 · DOI
  89. Zaller, 1992, The Nature and Origin of Mass Opinion, 10.1017/CBO9780511818691 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Powell, G. B.
Affiliations
University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Powell, G. Bingham
Venue
xxxx
Publisher
Test accounts
Published
2004-06-15
Volume
7
Pages
273-296
ISSN
1094-2939 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.50505/nlmtest4
OpenAlex
W2979510418
Cited by
35
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Annual Review of Political Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Science Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
Keywords
political representation, comparative politics, legislatures, political parties, interest groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review