Cited by 22Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies

The relationship between negative problem orientation and worry: A meta-analytic review

Open access
Clarke, James Bowness, Ford, Michelle, Heary, Sara, Rodgers, Jacqui, Freeston, Mark H.·2017·Psychopathology Review

Abstract

Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD) can have a significant detrimental effect on the lives of sufferers. Research into the psychological process involved in worry has an important role in the prevention and treatment of problems such as GAD. Negative problem orientation (NPO) has been identified as an important psychological construct involved in worry (Gosselin, Ladouceur & Pelletier, 2005). The focus of this meta-analytic review was to further our understanding of the relationship between NPO and worry, and a related construct called intolerance of uncertainty (IU). The review identified 31 articles reporting correlations between measures of NPO and worry. These articles detailed a total of 33 independent effect sizes. Using a random-effects model and raw and attenuation-corrected values, NPO was found to be significantly correlated to worry (r = 0.57, CI = 0.55–0.60, k = 33, N = 5376). The type of NPO measure moderated the relationship between NPO and worry. In addition, NPO was found to be significantly correlated with IU (r= 0.71, CI = 0.69–0.73, k = 14, N = 3072) and more strongly correlated with IU than with worry (p<.05). The findings have implications for theory, research and practice. Issues in the measurement of NPO are discussed, and the relationship between NPO and IU is considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5127/pr.034313

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clarke, J. B., Ford, M., Heary, S., Rodgers, J., & Freeston, M. H.
Affiliations
  • Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Freeston, Mark H.
Venue
Psychopathology Review
Published
2016-12-05
Volume
a4
Issue
3
Pages
319-340
ISSN
2051-8315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2738114057
Cited by
22
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychopathology Review (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
Keywords
negative problem orientation, worry, intolerance of uncertainty, generalized anxiety disorder, anxiety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review