Cited by 298Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsMind wandering and attention

Gender differences in worry and associated cognitive-behavioral variables

Robichaud, Melisa, Dugas, Michel J, Conway, Michael·2003·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

Research has shown that there is a significant gender difference in the worry report of women and men, with women often reporting more worry than men. The present study investigated this phenomenon by looking at gender differences in cognitive variables associated with worry; namely, intolerance of uncertainty, negative problem orientation, positive beliefs about worry, and cognitive avoidance. The sample consisted of 217 female and 100 male university students who completed six questionnaires assessing worry and associated cognitive variables. Women reported more worry than men on two measures of the tendency to worry, as well as more worries about lack of confidence issues. Women also reported a more negative problem orientation and engaging in more thought suppression, a type of cognitive avoidance. Thought suppression and negative orientation were found to make a significant contribution to the prediction of worry scores. Moreover, when both variables were controlled, the significant prediction of gender to worry disappeared. Hypotheses accounting for gender differences in thought suppression and negative problem orientation are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0887-6185(02)00237-2

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 70 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robichaud, M., Dugas, M. J., & Conway, M.
Affiliations
  • Concordia University (CA)
  • Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Dugas, Michel J
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-01
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
501-516
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989990228
Cited by
298
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
Keywords
gender differences, worry, intolerance of uncertainty, negative problem orientation, cognitive avoidance, thought suppression, university students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Avoidance Learning, Cognition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Defense Mechanisms, Female, Gender Identity, Humans, Male, Personality Inventory, Problem Solving, Students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review