Cited by 803Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

The prevention of depressive symptoms in children and adolescents: a meta-analytic review

Horowitz, Jason L., Garber, Judy·2006·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Research on the prevention of depressive symptoms in children and adolescents was reviewed and synthesized with meta-analysis. When all 30 studies were included, selective prevention programs were found to be more effective than universal programs immediately following intervention. Both selective and indicated prevention programs were more effective than universal programs at follow-up, even when the 2 studies with college students were excluded. Effect sizes for selective and indicated prevention programs tended to be small to moderate, both immediately postintervention and at an average follow-up of 6 months. Most effective interventions are more accurately described as treatment rather than prevention. Suggestions for future research include testing potential moderators (e.g., age, gender, anxiety, parental depression) and mechanisms, designing programs that are developmentally appropriate and gender and culturally sensitive, including longer follow-ups, and using multiple measures and methods to assess both symptoms and diagnoses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-006x.74.3.401

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intervention programs for depression targeting at-risk individuals (selective and indicated programs) exhibited more support than those delivered universally.

    “Research has shown that intervention programs for depression targeting at-risk individuals (selective and indicated programs) exhibited more support than those delivered universally”
  • Our analyses point at the potential of equivalent effects for online guided self-help interventions among universal and selective samples in the college context.

    “In contrast to multiple meta-analyses of different depression intervention programs supporting superior effects among selective to universal samples (Horowitz and Judy, 2006; Merry et al., 2004; Stice et al., 2009), our analyses point at the potential of equivalent effects for online guided self-help interventions among these samples in the college context.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horowitz, J. L., & Garber, J.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2006
Volume
74
Issue
3
Pages
401-415
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2156426418
Cited by
803
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 56
FWCI
5.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH57822; R01-MH64735; K02-MH66249)
  • Williman T. Grant Foundation (173096)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
depression prevention, depressive symptoms, children, adolescents, universal prevention programs, prevention versus treatment, follow-up outcomes, moderators, gender differences, parental depression, anxiety
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Depression, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review