Cited by 32Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychology and Mental HealthPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Experimental Psychopathology and Clinical Psychology: An Integrative Model to Guide Clinical Science and Practice

Waters, Allison M., LeBeau, Richard T., Craske, Michelle G.·2017·Psychopathology Review

Abstract

Experimental psychopathology has elucidated mechanisms underlying various forms of psychopathology and has contributed to the continuous updating and generation of mechanistically-focused and evidence-based psychological treatments. Clinical psychology is an applied field of psychology concerned with the assessment and treatment of psychological disorders and behavioral problems. Despite the notable commonality in their focus upon psychological dysfunction, conceptual frameworks that guide their integration are surprisingly scarce. Clinical science and practice would benefit greatly from the combined strengths of each discipline. In this review, we begin by defining experimental psychopathology and clinical psychology, we present arguments for greater integration between them, and we propose a model to guide the integration of experimental psychopathology-informed science into clinical practice, illustrating the relevance of the model by drawing upon the seminal research on fear conditioning and extinction and other experimental paradigms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5127/pr.038015

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The non-significant main effects of the intervention on the majority of anxiety outcomes may be due to the relatively low-intensity intervention and the unselected non-clinical sample.

    “The non-significant main effects of the intervention on the majority of anxiety outcomes could be due to a number of factors. First, following methods typical in experimental psychopathology, we employed a relatively low-intensity intervention and evaluated the effects in an unselected non-clinical sample (Waters et al., 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waters, A. M., LeBeau, R. T., & Craske, M. G.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Waters, Allison M.
Venue
Psychopathology Review
Published
2016-02-21
Volume
a4
Issue
2
Pages
112-128
ISSN
2051-8315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2325496824
Cited by
32
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychopathology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
experimental psychopathology, clinical psychology, integration of research and practice, evidence-based psychotherapy, fear conditioning, extinction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review