Cited by 599Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Improving access to psychological therapy: initial evaluation of two UK demonstration sites

Open access
Clark, David M., Layard, Richard, Smithies, Rachel, Richards, David A., Suckling, Rupert, Wright, Benjamin·2009·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Recently the UK Government announced an unprecedented, large-scale initiative for Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) for depression and anxiety disorders. Prior to this development, the Department of Health established two pilot projects that aimed to collect valuable information to inform the national roll-out. Doncaster and Newham received additional funds to rapidly increase the availability of CBT-related interventions and to deploy them in new clinical services, operating on stepped-care principles, when appropriate. This article reports an evaluation of the new services (termed 'demonstration sites') during their first thirteen months of operation. A session-by-session outcome monitoring system achieved unusually high levels of pre to post-treatment data completeness. Large numbers of patients were treated, with low-intensity interventions (such as guided self-help) being particularly helpful for achieving high throughput. Clinical outcomes were broadly in line with expectation. 55-56% of patients who had attended at least twice (including the assessment interview) were classified as recovered when they left the services and 5% had improved their employment status. Treatment gains were largely maintained at 10 month follow-up. Opening the services to self-referral appeared to facilitate access for some groups that tend to be underrepresented in general practice referrals. Outcomes were comparable for the different ethnic groups who access the services. Issues for the further development of IAPT are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2009.07.010

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies found that self-referral and more particularly non-stigmatising self-referral increased access for ethnic minority communities.

    “Of note is that previous studies found that self-referral and more particularly non-stigmatising self-referral, increased access for ethnic minority communities [39,40].”

    From Development and evaluation of culturally sensitive psychosocial interventions for under-served people in primary care (2014) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Results (Newham; page unavailable) report that Black patients were more prominent among self-referrals than GP referrals, and conclude that self-referral improved access for this underrepresented group. The paper does not identify a non-stigmatising form of self-referral or show that it was particularly effective; its specific comparison also does not establish the same effect across ethnic minority communities generally. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Both the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 have been shown to be sensitive to change when treatment response is monitored.

    “Moreover, both measures have proven sensitive to change when monitoring treatment response.20;33-36”
  • In the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies project, cognitive-behavioral approaches were packaged as low intensity versus high intensity to expand workforce capability and ensure that people with less severe problems could receive care from less intensively trained practitioners.

    “in the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies project, cognitive-behavioral approaches were explicitly packaged as low intensity versus high intensity to efficiently expand workforce capability and ensure that people with less severe problems could receive care from psychological wellbeing practitioners with less intensive training (Clark et al., 2009; Glover, Webb, & Evison, 2010)”
  • In the Newham evaluation, social phobia and obsessive compulsive disorder were significantly more common among self-referrals than among GP referrals.

    “Another finding of note was that social phobia and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) were found to be significantly more common among self-referrals than among GP referrals.”
  • In the final 3 months of the Newham evaluation, the proportion of self-referrers increased to 42%.

    “In the final 3 months of the evaluation, the proportion of selfreferrers had increased to 42%.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. NICE Obsessive-compulsive disorder: Core interventions in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder and body dysmorphic disorder (clinical guideline 31) 2005 National Institute for Clinical Excellence London, UK www.nice.og 21834191

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clark, D. M., Layard, R., Smithies, R., Richards, D. A., Suckling, R., & Wright, B.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • East London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Clark, David M.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
47
Issue
11
Pages
910-920
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990798545
Cited by
599
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 41
FWCI
51.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (069777)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Economic and Social Research Council (RES-107-28-1001)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
Improving Access to Psychological Therapies, depression, anxiety disorders, cognitive behavioral therapy, stepped care, demonstration sites, guided self-help, self-referral, service evaluation, treatment outcomes, ethnic minority patients, employment effects, general practitioner referral
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, United Kingdom, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review