Cited by 840Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsEducational Research and Analysis

Applying thematic analysis theory to practice: A researcher’s experience

Tuckett, Anthony G.·2005·Contemporary Nurse

Abstract

This article describes an experience of thematic analysis. In order to answer the question 'What does analysis look like in practice?' it describes in brief how the methodology of grounded theory, the epistemology of social constructionism, and the theoretical stance of symbolic interactionism inform analysis. Additionally, analysis is examined by evidencing the systematic processes--here termed organising, coding, writing, theorising, and reading--that led the researcher to develop a final thematic schema.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5172/conu.19.1-2.75

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Thematic analysis is one of the most used but often poorly defined approaches in the qualitative research community.

    “Thematic analysis is one of the most used but often poorly defined approaches in the qualitative research community.”

    From Conducting Thematic Analysis with Qualitative Data (2021) · cites this paper as Tuckett, 2005

  • Scholars have reached limited agreement about how thematic analysis should be performed.

    “Scholars have reached limited agreement about how thematic analysis should be performed (Attride-Stirling, 2001; Boyatzis, 1998; Tuckett, 2005).”

    From Conducting Thematic Analysis with Qualitative Data (2021) · cites this paper as Tuckett, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tuckett, A. G.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Tuckett, Anthony G.
Venue
Contemporary Nurse
Published
2005-08
Volume
19
Issue
1-2
Pages
75-87
ISSN
  • 1037-6178 (ISSN-L)
  • 1839-3535
OpenAlex
W2093790434
Cited by
840
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 29
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Contemporary Nurse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Analysis
Keywords
thematic analysis, grounded theory, social constructionism, symbolic interactionism, qualitative research methodology, coding, theorizing, nursing research
MeSH terms
Aged, Data Collection, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Nurse-Patient Relations, Nursing Theory, Philosophy, Nursing, Research Design, Review Literature as Topic, Symbolism, Truth Disclosure, Writing, Nursing Methodology Research, Models, Nursing, Knowledge, Narration, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review