Cited by 7Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Parents’ Perspectives on Guided Parent-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Childhood Anxiety Disorders: A Qualitative Study

Open access
Allard, Charlotte, Thirlwall, Kerstin, Cooper, Peter, Brown, Alex, O’Brien, Doireann, Creswell, Cathy·2022·Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders

Abstract

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an effective treatment for child anxiety disorders. Low-intensity forms of CBT, such as guided parent-delivered CBT (GPD-CBT), have been developed to increase access; however, it is unclear why some children benefit from this treatment and others do not. This qualitative study aimed to increase understanding of parents’ experiences of GPD-CBT and what facilitates and creates barriers to good outcomes. The sample was derived from a sample of families who took part in long-term follow-up assessments (reported in). Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Two themes containing five subthemes were developed from the data. Theme 1 described factors influencing the experience of GPD-CBT. Theme 2 described perceived outcomes in the child and wider changes within the family. The identification of facilitators and barriers to the success of GPD-CBT could inform and improve future treatment delivery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/10634266211028199

Cites

36 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed., pp. 310319, 416-423). Oxford University Press.
  2. Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed., pp. 429-511). SAGE.
  3. Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Analysing qualitative data. British Medical Journal , 320 (7227), 114-116.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allard, C., Thirlwall, K., Cooper, P., Brown, A., O’Brien, D., & Creswell, C.
Affiliations
University of Reading (GB)
Corresponding author
Allard, Charlotte
Venue
Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders
Published
2021-07-02
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
235-244
ISSN
  • 1063-4266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4799
OpenAlex
W3173801973
Cited by
7
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
childhood anxiety disorders, parental experiences, low-intensity treatment, family change, long-term follow-up

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review