Cited by 247Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

Key determinants of global land-use projections

Open access
Stehfest, Elke, van Zeist, Willem-Jan, Valin, Hugo, Havlik, Petr, Popp, Alexander, Kyle, Page, Tabeau, Andrzej, Mason-D’Croz, Daniel +9 more·2019·Nature Communications

Abstract

Land use is at the core of various sustainable development goals. Long-term climate foresight studies have structured their recent analyses around five socio-economic pathways (SSPs), with consistent storylines of future macroeconomic and societal developments; however, model quantification of these scenarios shows substantial heterogeneity in land-use projections. Here we build on a recently developed sensitivity approach to identify how future land use depends on six distinct socio-economic drivers (population, wealth, consumption preferences, agricultural productivity, land-use regulation, and trade) and their interactions. Spread across models arises mostly from diverging sensitivities to long-term drivers and from various representations of land-use regulation and trade, calling for reconciliation efforts and more empirical research. Most influential determinants for future cropland and pasture extent are population and agricultural efficiency. Furthermore, land-use regulation and consumption changes can play a key role in reducing both land use and food-security risks, and need to be central elements in sustainable development strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-019-09945-w

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most high-ranking models used for global food security analysis are part of large-scale integrated assessment tools also used for climate change, biodiversity and land use studies.

    “most of the high-ranking models used for global food security analysis (Fig. 2b) are (part of) large-scale integrated assessment tools that are used for global climate change 65 , biodiversity 34 and land use 66 studies, among others.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]IPCC. Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Report No. 0 521 80493 0 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).
  2. [34]IAASTD. Agriculture at a Crossroads: Global Report. 2009 Washington, DC Island Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stehfest, E., van Zeist, W.-J., Valin, H., Havlik, P., Popp, A., Kyle, P., Tabeau, A., Mason-D’Croz, D., Hasegawa, T., Bodirsky, B. L., Calvin, K., Doelman, J. C., Fujimori, S., Humpenöder, F., Lotze-Campen, H., van Meijl, H., & Wiebe, K.
Affiliations
  • Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL)
  • International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (AT)
  • Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (DE)
  • Joint Global Change Research Institute (US)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • International Food Policy Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Stehfest, Elke
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2019-05-15
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
2166-2166
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2946090470
Cited by
247
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 6
FWCI
15.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (acceptedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • IFPRI E-brary (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • International Food Policy Research Institute (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RENATE (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RENATE (cc-by)
Funders
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020, 689150)
  • Ministry of Environment
  • Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
land use projections, socioeconomic pathways, sensitivity analysis, cropland extent, population growth, agricultural productivity, land use regulation, international trade, consumption preferences, food security, climate change scenarios, model heterogeneity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review