Cited by 12Pain Management and Placebo EffectNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The placebo effect on psychomotor performance and working memory capacity: randomized single blind cross-over trial

Open access
Ashor, Ammar W.·2011·Annals Of Neurosciences

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Imaging studies show that placebo enhance release of dopamine in the mesolimbic and mesocortical tracts. Dopamine in these areas are involved in attention and working memory function. PURPOSE: We wanted to investigating the effect of placebo on psychomotor function and working memory capacity. METHOD: 31 medical students participated in this single blind, crossover trial. Choice reaction time, critical flicker fusion threshold, n-back working memory tasks measured before and after one hour of the students receiving placebo in three different occasions as stimulant, unknown, and inert substance. RESULTS: Placebo, as stimulant, significantly enhanced choice reaction time and working memory function (P < 0.05) while showed no significant effect on critical flicker fusion threshold (P > 0.05). Placebo as unknown significantly deteriorates working memory capacity (P < 0.05). Placebo as inert substance shows no significant changes regarding choice reaction time, critical flicker fusion threshold, and working memory task. CONCLUSION: Placebo, as stimulant enhanced attention and improved working memory capacity, while as unknown may deteriorate working memory function.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5214/ans.0972.7531.1118403

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Outcome expectancies are central in the placebo response, in which individuals expect that pharmacological and other interventions will lead to beneficial outcomes.

    “Outcome expectancies are central in the placebo response in which individuals expect that pharmacological and other interventions will lead to beneficial outcomes (Ashor, 2011;de la Fuente-Fernandez, 2009;Lidstone et al., 2010;Wager & Atlas, 2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ashor, A. W.
Affiliations
Mustansiriyah University (IQ)
Corresponding author
Ashor, Ammar W.
Venue
Annals Of Neurosciences
Published
2011-08-19
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
141-4
ISSN
  • 0972-7531 (ISSN-L)
  • 0976-3260
OpenAlex
W2081300752
Cited by
12
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
placebo effect, psychomotor performance, working memory capacity, choice reaction time, critical flicker fusion threshold, dopamine, mesolimbic system, mesocortical pathway, attention, medical students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review