Cited by 63Workplace Health and Well-beingMedical Practices and RehabilitationOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

Effectiveness of a participatory physical and psychosocial intervention to balance the demands and resources of industrial workers: A cluster-randomized controlled trial

Open access
Gupta, Nidhi, Wåhlin-Jacobsen, Christian Dyrlund, Abildgaard, Johan Simonsen, Henriksen, Louise Nøhr, Nielsen, Karina, Holtermann, Andreas·2018·Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a participatory physical and psychosocial workplace intervention (known as PIPPI) on work ability and recovery among industrial workers. Methods Eligible workers were cluster-randomized into intervention (N=193) and control (N=222) groups. Intervention group members participated in three workshops where they mapped positive and negative aspects of their physical and psychosocial work environment and developed action plans addressing the highlighted issues, which were subsequently implemented by the participants. Questionnaire-based data on work ability and recovery were collected at baseline and 8-, 10- and 12-month follow-up. Data on productivity, well-being, mental health, and physical demands and resources were collected at baseline and 12-month follow-up. Results The intervention was delivered and received as planned (100% planned workshops conducted, 69% [standard deviation (SD) 7%] participation in workshops) and with a response rate of 76% (SD 8%) to the questionnaires. No significant between-group improvements for any of the outcomes were found in intention-to-treat multi-level mixed models. On the contrary, tendencies were observed for poorer recovery and reduced work ability in the intervention compared to control group. Conclusion The intervention did not improve the outcomes. This result can have several explanations, such as a regression-toward-the-mean effect or that the intervention might have put an additional burden on the workers already facing high work demands. In addition, there may have been an insufficient match between the intervention components implemented and the predetermined outcomes, and implementation may have been unsuccessful. These potential explanations need to be investigated using process evaluation data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5271/sjweh.3689

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The integration of complementary methodologies, such as motion capture systems, can provide more complete and personalized evaluations.

    “La integración de metodologías complementarias, como sistemas de captura de movimiento, puede proporcionar evaluaciones más completas y personalizadas [23], [35].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gupta, N., Wåhlin-Jacobsen, C. D., Abildgaard, J. S., Henriksen, L. N., Nielsen, K., & Holtermann, A.
Affiliations
  • National Research Centre for the Working Environment (DK)
  • Copenhagen Business School (DK)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health
Published
2017-11-02
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
58-68
ISSN
  • 0355-3140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1795-990X
OpenAlex
W2766241596
Cited by
62
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
participatory intervention, psychosocial work environment, physical demands, work ability, recovery, industrial workers, workplace interventions, action planning, mental health, well-being, productivity, intervention effectiveness
MeSH terms
Adult, Efficiency, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Industry, Male, Mental Health, Organizational Innovation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Occupational Health, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review