The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
explosion/spaCy v2.2.4.dev0
Open accessAbstract
✨ New features and improvements Update __all__ fields (#13063). 🔴 Bug fixes #13035: Remove Pathy requirement. #13053: Restore spacy.cli.project API. #13057: Support Any comparisons for Token and Span. 📖 Documentation and examples Many updates for spacy-llm including Azure OpenAI, PaLM, and Mistral support. Various documentation corrections. 👥 Contributors @adrianeboyd, @honnibal, @ines, @rmitsch, @svlandeg
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recent advances and applications of deep learning methods in materials science
Choudhary, K., DeCost, B., Chen, C., Jain, A., Tavazza, F., Cohn, R., Park, C. W., Choudhary, A., Agrawal, A., Billinge, S. J. L., et al. (2022) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-022-00734-6 · Cited by 1,172
Measuring and improving consistency in pretrained language models
Elazar, Y., Kassner, N., Ravfogel, S., Ravichander, A., Hovy, E., Schütze, H., & Goldberg, Y. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00410 · Cited by 220
Nicholson, J. M., Mordaunt, M., Lopez, P., Uppala, A., Rosati, D., Rodrigues, N. P., Grabitz, P., & Rife, S. C. (2021) · bioRxiv (published in Quantitative Science Studies) · doi:10.1101/2021.03.15.435418 · Cited by 202
Widyasari, R., Sim, S. Q., Lok, C., Qi, H., Phan, J., Tay, Q., Tan, C., Wee, F., Tan, J. E., Yieh, Y., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the 28th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3368089.3417943 · Cited by 150
Schöbel, S., Schmitt, A., Benner, D., Saqr, M., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2024) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-023-10375-9 · Cited by 127
Hu, J., Small, H., Kean, H., Takahashi, A., Zekelman, L., Kleinman, D., Ryan, E., Nieto-Castañón, A., Ferreira, V., & Fedorenko, E. (2023) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhac350 · Cited by 73
Augmenting interpretable models with large language models during training
Singh, C., Askari, A., Caruana, R., & Gao, J. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43713-1 · Cited by 63
Yim, W.-W., Fu, Y., Ben Abacha, A., Snider, N., Lin, T., & Yetisgen, M. (2023) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-023-02487-3 · Cited by 64
ProoFVer: Natural Logic Theorem Proving for Fact Verification
Krishna, A., Riedel, S., & Vlachos, A. (2022) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00503 · Cited by 51
Exploration on Integrating Accessibility into an AI Course
Tseng, C.-E., Jung, S. H., Elglaly, Y. N., Liu, Y., & Ludi, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/3478431.3499399 · Cited by 42
Measuring Representational Harms in Image Captioning
Wang, A., Barocas, S., Laird, K., & Wallach, H. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533099 · Cited by 40
Silver Lining in the Fake News Cloud: Can Large Language Models Help Detect Misinformation?
Kumar, R., Goddu, B., Saha, S., & Jatowt, A. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2024.3440248 · Cited by 32
Richie, R., Ruiz, V. M., Han, S., Shi, L., & Tsui, F. (. (2023) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocad046 · Cited by 25
Model-based analysis of brain activity reveals the hierarchy of language in 305 subjects
Caucheteux, C., Gramfort, A., & King, J.-R. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021 · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.308 · Cited by 21
ProVe: A pipeline for automated provenance verification of knowledge graphs against textual sources
Amaral, G., Rodrigues, O., & Simperl, E. (2023) · Semantic Web · doi:10.3233/sw-233467 · Cited by 8
Saini, A., & Farnoud, A. (2025) · CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/psp4.70127 · Cited by 7
LogUpdater : Automated Detection and Repair of Specific Defects in Logging Statements
Zhong, R., Li, Y., Kuang, J., Gu, W., Huo, Y., & Lyu, M. R. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3731754 · Cited by 7
(2025) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732087 · Cited by 4
Kiulian, A., Polishko, A., Khandoga, M., Kostiuk, Y., Gabrielli, G., Gagała, Ł., Zaraket, F., Abu Obaida, Q., Garud, H., Wing Yee Mak, W., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the Fourth Ukrainian Natural Language Processing Workshop (UNLP 2025) · doi:10.18653/v1/2025.unlp-1.1 · Cited by 2
SmartSearch: How Ranking Beats Structure for Conversational Memory Retrieval
Derehag, J., Calva, C., & Ghiurau, T. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.15599
Quantifying the prevalence and impact of overreaching causal claims in social science
Isch, C., Dörr, T., Fasching, N., Jennings, G., & Watts, D. J. (2026) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-026-02553-x
Metadata
- Authors
- Honnibal, M., Montani, I., Honnibal, M., Peters, H., Samsonov, M., Geovedi, J., Regan, J., Orosz, G., Kristiansen, S. L., R., Altinok, D., McCann, P. O., Howard, G., A., K., Bozek, S., Bot, E., Amery, M., Vogelsang, L. U., GregDubbin, Mazaev, V., Tippa, P. K., Wbwseeker, Phatthiyaphaibun, W., Burton, M., Mpuels, (Tom), Y. D., ThomasO, Balakrishnan, R., & Patel, A.
- Venue
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Publisher
- Zenodo
- Published
- 2023-10-16
- OpenAlex
- W6949549905
- Cited by
- 536
- References
- 0
- Type
- software
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
