Cited by 91Topic ModelingSpeech and dialogue systemsNatural Language Processing Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ChatGpt: Open Possibilities

Open access
Mohammad Aljanabi, Mohanad Ghazi, Ahmed Hussein Ali, Saad Abas Abed, ChatGpt·2023·Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics

Abstract

ChatGPT-3 is a powerful language model developed by OpenAI that has the potential to revolutionize the way weinteract with technology. This model has been trained on a massive amount of data, allowing it to understand andgenerate human-like text with remarkable accuracy. One of the most exciting possibilities of ChatGPT-3 is its potentialto improve natural language processing (NLP) and natural language understanding (NLU) in a wide range ofapplications. In particular, ChatGPT-3 can be used to power chatbots, virtual assistants, and other conversationalinterfaces. These types of systems are becoming increasingly important as more and more people use voice and text tointeract with technology, we list ChatGpt role in each of the follwoing sections

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.52866/20ijcsm.2023.01.01.0018

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. S. O'Connor, "Open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: Tools for academic progress or abuse?," Nurse Education in Practice, vol. 66, pp. 103537-103537, 2022.
  2. M. R. King, "The future of AI in medicine: a perspective from a Chatbot," ed: Springer, 2022, pp. 1-5.
  3. M. Hammad, "The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Programs on Writing Scientific Research," Annals of Biomedical Engineering, pp. 1-2, 2023.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Aljanabi, M., Ghazi, M., Ali, A. H., Abed, S. A., & ChatGpt
Affiliations
  • Iraqi University (IQ)
  • OpenAI (United States) (US)
Venue
Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics
Published
2023-01-18
Pages
62-64
ISSN
2788-7421 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4318466538
Cited by
91
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 42
FWCI
7.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
ChatGPT-3, large language models, natural language processing, natural language understanding, chatbots, virtual assistants, conversational interfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review