CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationAI in Service Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Mediating Effect Of Learning Motivation On Attitudes Towards Using ChatGPT (ATUC) As Educational Resource And Academic Performance: Evidence From A State University In Iloilo, Philippines

Open access
Amorin, Ronel B, Gallaron, Gesila M·2025·MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices
DOI 10.52634/mier/2025/v15/i1/2827
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The use of AI chatbots, such as ChatGPT, in education has sparked significant interest, primarily due to their potential to enhance educational outcomes significantly. This study, employing a causal-predictive methodology, delved into the relationship between attitudes toward ChatGPT (ATUC), academic performance, and the mediating role of learning motivation among tertiary students at a state university in Iloilo, Philippines. Data were collected via an online survey that included personal demographics, adopted questionnaires for ATUC (Ajlouni et al., 2023) and learn- ing motivation (Caratiquit & Caratiquit, 2023), as well as an adapted questionnaire for academic performance (Maqableh et al., 2021). The study, which included 205 purposively selected respondents who met the inclusion criteria, utilised covariance-based structural equation modelling (CB-SEM) for data examination. The bootstrapping results demonstrated a positive relationship, with ATUC predicting learning motivation, which predicted academic performance, thereby encouraging the potential of AI chatbots in education. Future research should employ longitudinal and mixed meth- ods to investigate ChatGPT’s long-term impacts while minimising bias. It should be integrated into higher education institutions’ (HEIs) strategies, emphasising ethics, academic integrity, the advantages and disadvantages of AI, and its adaptability for faculty and students.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.52634/mier/2025/v15/i1/2827

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Agapito, J. J. (2023). User perceptions and privacy concerns related to using ChatGPT in conversational AI systems. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4440366 · DOI
  2. Ahmadi, A. (2023). ChatGPT: Exploring the threats and opportunities of artificial intelligence in the age of Chatbots. Asian Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 12(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.51983/ajcst-2023.12.1.3567 · DOI
  3. Aithal, S., & Aithal, P. S. (2023). Effects of AI-Based ChatGPT on higher education libraries. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Science, 8(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.47992/ijmts.2581.6012.0272 · DOI
  4. Ajlouni, A., & Rawadieh, S. (2022). Technophobia and Technophilia among undergraduates: Cross-national research in Jordan, Qatar, and Egypt. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 13(4), 24–25. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1375664.pdf
  5. Ali, J. K. M., & Bin-Hady, W. R. A. (2019). A Study of EFL Students’ Attitudes, Motivation and Anxiety towards WhatsApp as a Language Learning Tool. Arab World English Journal, 5, 289–298. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call5.19 · DOI
  6. Aljanabi, M., Yaseen, M., Ali, A. H., & Abed, S. A. (2023). ChatGPT: Open possibilities. Iraqi Journal for computer Science and Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.52866/ijcsm.2023.01.01.0018 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Alotaibi, R., Al-Shehri, S., Al-Harbi, R., & Al-Mutairi, M. (2020). Enhancing learning outcomes through chatbot technology in computer science education. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 5167–5183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10182-8 · DOI
  8. Asare, M. (2015). Using the theory of planned behavior to determine the condom use behavior among college students. American Journal of Health Studies, 30(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.47779/ajhs.2015.168 · DOI
  9. Atiyah, A., Mohamad, A., & Zunaidah. (2021). The effect of e-learning and learning motivation on academic stress with self-efficacy as a mediation variable during the COVID-19 pandemic. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 10(118). https://rjoas.com/issue-2021-10/article_02.pdf · DOI
  10. Babalola, V. T., Ahmad, N. S. S., & Tafida, N. H. S. (2024). CHATGPT in Organic Chemistry Classrooms: Analyzing the impacts of social environment on students’ interest, critical thinking and academic achievement. International Journal of Education and Teaching Zone, 3(1), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.57092/ijetz.v3i1.155 · DOI
  11. Bhat, A. Z., Ahmed, I., Kameswari, L., & Khan, M. S. (2023). A Game Based Innovative teaching and learning environment to enhance progression and performance of students. SHS Web of Conferences. 156, 01001. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202315601001 · DOI
  12. Brenner, C. A. (2022). Self-regulated learning, self-determination theory and teacher candidates’ development of competency-based teaching practices. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-021-00184-5 · DOI
  13. Caratiquit, K. D., & Caratiquit, L. J. C. (2023). ChatGPT as an academic support tool on the academic performance among students: The mediating role of learning motivation. Journal of Social, Humanity, and Education, 4(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v4i1.1558 · DOI
  14. Chin, W., Cheah, J., Liu, Y., Ting, H., Lim, X., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Demystifying the role of causal-predictive modeling using partial least squares structural equation modeling in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(12), 2161–2209. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-10-2019-0529 · DOI
  15. Chiu, T. K. F., Moorhouse, B. L., Chai, C. S., & Ismailov, M. (2023). Teacher support and student motivation to learn with artificial intelligence (AI) based chatbot. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2172044 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Dasborough, M. T. (2023). Awe-inspiring advancements in AI: The impact of ChatGPT on the field of organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(2), 177–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/ job.2695 · DOI
  17. Ebadi, S., & Amini, A. (2022). Examining the roles of social presence and human-likeness on Iranian EFL learners’ motivation using artificial intelligence technology: A case of CSIEC chatbot. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2096638 · DOI
  18. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Estrellado, C. J. P., & Miranda, J. C. (2023). Artificial intelligence in the Philippine educational context: Circumspection and future inquiries. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 13(5), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.13.05.2023.p13704 · DOI
  21. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312 · DOI · Paper page
  22. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics 26 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference (16th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Haleem, A., Javaid, M., & Singh, R. P. (2022). An era of ChatGPT as a significant futuristic support tool: A study on features, abilities, and challenges. Bench Council Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 2(4), 100089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100089 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Jishnu, D., Srinivasan, M., Dhanunjay, G. S., & Shamala, R. (2023). Unveiling student motivations: A study of chatgpt usage in education. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts, 4(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i2.2023.503 · DOI
  25. Juhász, L., Mooney, P., Hochmair, H. H., & Guan, B. (2023). ChatGPT as a mapping assistant: A novel method to enrich maps with generative AI and content derived from street-level photographs. (pp. 1–12). UC Santa Barbara: Center for Spatial Studies. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.25436/E2ZW27 · DOI
  26. Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who’s the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Kapse, M., Bala, A., & Sharma, V. (2022). Gender and green IT practice— Implications from the ABC model of attitude. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 29(3), 308–325. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIR.2022.127178 · DOI
  28. Kefalaki, M., Diamantidaki, F., & Rudolph, J. (2022). Editorial 5(SI1): Technology and education: Innovation or hindrance? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 5(Special Issue). 6–11. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2022.5.s1.1 · DOI
  29. Khaneghahi, S., Nasripour, F., & MahmoudZehi, M. A. (2022). Investigating the relationship between e-learning and mobile learning on students’ academic self- handicapping during the outbreak of COVID-19. Journal of Social, Humanity and Education, 2(3), 269–281. https://doi.org/10.35912/jshe.v2i3.1051 · DOI
  30. King, T., & Dennis, C. (2006). Unethical consumers. Qualitative Market Research an International Journal, 9(3), 282–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750610671699 · DOI
  31. Kitamura, F. C. (2023). ChatGPT is shaping the future of medical writing but still requires human judgment. Radiology, 307(2), e230171. https://doi.org/10.1148/RADIOL.230171 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Klassen, R. M., Bong, M., Usher, E. L., Chong, W. H., Huan, V. S., Wong, I. Y., & Georgiou, T. (2009). Exploring the validity of a teachers’ self-efficacy scale in five countries. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.08.001 · DOI
  33. Lahey, B. B., McNealy, K., Knodt, A., Zald, D. H., Sporns, O., Manuck, S. B., Flory, J. D., Applegate, B., Rathouz, P. J., & Hariri, A. R. (2012). Using confirmatory factor analysis to measure contemporaneous activation of defined neuronal networks in functional magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage, 60(4), 1982–1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.002 · DOI
  34. Lee, H. (2023). The rise of ChatGPT: Exploring its potential in medical education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 17(9), 1779. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2270 · DOI
  35. Lu, C., & Cutumisu, M. (2022). Online engagement and performance on formative assessments mediate the relationship between attendance and course performance. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(2). 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00307-5 · DOI
  36. Maqableh, M., Jaradat, M., & Azzam, A. (2021). Exploring the determinants of students’ academic performance at university level: The mediating role of internet usage continuance intention. Education and Information Technologies, 26(4), 4003–4025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10453-y · DOI
  37. Menon, S., & Suresh, M. (2022). Enablers of technology agility in higher education. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 39(2), 166–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijilt-07-2021-0107 · DOI
  38. Mhlanga, D. (2023). The value of open AI and Chat GPT for the current learning environments and the potential future uses. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4439267 · DOI
  39. Moralista, R., & Oducado, R. (2020). Faculty perception toward online education in a state college in the Philippines during the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4736–4742. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081044 · DOI
  40. Nulty, D.D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701293231 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Okuyama, K., & Suzuki, K. (2023). Correlators of double scaled SYK at one-loop. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2023(5). 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep05(2023)117 · DOI
  42. Porayska-Pomsta, K., & Rajendran, G. (2019). Accountability in human and artificial intelligence Decision-Making as the basis for diversity and educational inclusion. In Perspectives on rethinking and reforming education (pp. 39–59). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8161-43 · DOI
  43. Roumeliotis, K. I., & Tselikas, N. D. (2023). ChatGPT and Open-AI models: A preliminary review. Future Internet, 15(6), 192. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15060192 · DOI
  44. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Sanchez-Bolivar, L., & Martinez-Martinez, A. (2022). Factors related to university students’ motivation and instruments for its evaluation: A systematic review. Revista Electrónica Educare, 26(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.15359/ree.26-2.26 · DOI
  46. Sebastian, G. (2023). Privacy and Data protection in ChatGPT and other AI Chatbots: Strategies for Securing User information. International Journal of Security and Privacy in Pervasive Computing, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSPPC.325475 · DOI
  47. Sengupta, S., & Chakraborty, T. (2020). Use of chatbots in higher education: A study of student engagement and satisfaction. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 514–5165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10171-x · DOI
  48. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and non-experimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-11349-006 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Suharmawan, W. (2023). Pemanfaatan Chat GPT dalam Dunia Pendidikan. Education Journal: Journal Educational Research and Development, 7(2), 158–166. https://doi.org/10.31537/ej.v7i2.1248 · DOI
  50. Svenningsson, J., Höst, G., Hultén, M., & Hallström, J. (2022). Students’ attitudes toward technology: Exploring the relationship among affective, cognitive, and behavioral components of the attitude construct. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32, 1531–1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09657-7 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Tanvir, K., Islam, M. S., Sezan, S. B. K., Sanad, Z. A., & Ataur, A. I. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on Academic Performance among Bangladeshi Undergraduate Students. Deleted Journal, 35, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.55529/ijrise.35.18.28 · DOI
  52. Wardat, Y., Tashtoush, M. A., AlAli, R., & Jarrah, A. M. (2023). ChatGPT: A revolutionary tool for teaching and learning mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 19(7), em2286. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13272 · DOI
  53. Woodhouse, D., & Charlesworth, A. (2023). Can ChatGPT predict future interest rate decisions? Social Science Research Network, 13. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4572831 · DOI
  54. Xiong, J., Hsiang, E., He, Z., Zhan, T., & Wu, S. (2021). Augmented reality and virtual reality displays: Emerging technologies and future perspectives. Light, Science & Applications/Light: Science & Applications, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-021-00658-8 · DOI
  55. Zafrullah, Z., Hakim, M. L., & Angga, M. (2023). ChatGPT open AI: Analysis of mathematics education students learning interest. J. Technol. Global, 1(1), 1–10. https://penaeducentre.com/index.php/JTeG

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Amorin, R. B., & Gallaron, G. M.
Affiliations
West Visayas State University (PH)
ORCID
Venue
MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends and Practices
Publisher
Model Institute of Education and Research
Published
2025-05-01
Pages
214-239
ISSN
  • 0976-8203 (ISSN-L)
  • 2319-1945
DOI
10.52634/mier/2025/v15/i1/2827
OpenAlex
W4410045866
Cited by
3
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
MIER Journal of Educational Studies Trends & Practices (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Commission on Higher Education
  • University of the Philippines
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords
ChatGPT, student motivation, academic performance, mediating effect, artificial intelligence in higher education, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review