Cited by 19Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingCybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesLanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies

Online child sexual offenders' language use in real-time chats

Open access
Powell, Martine, Casey, Sharon·2021·Australian Institute of Criminology eBooks

Abstract

We analysed chat log communications between 38 adult males and children who were accessed by the men via social media for sexually exploitative purposes. Our goal was to understand how sexual offenders engage with children online and the dialogue they use to elicit compliance with sexual requests. Results revealed 72 discrete linguistic tactics, contained within eight overarching dialogue-based ‘moves’. Tactics were non-sequential (ie dynamic) and focused mainly on requests for sexual activity. Three distinct subgroup patterns of tactic use were evident. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.52922/ti78481

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Four included articles described that individuals often presented themselves as a trustworthy confidante as a method of building a deeper emotional connection with the victim and sustaining engagement.

    “Four of the included articles described how individuals often presented themselves as a trustworthy confidante as a method of building a deeper, emotional connection with the victim, and sustaining engagement (De Santisteban et al., 2018; Kloess etal., 2019; Powell etal., 2021; Whittle etal., 2015).”

    From Unraveling the Complexities of Offender Strategies as Part of Online Sexual Grooming and Technology-Assisted Child Sexual Abuse: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Powell et al., 2021

    The Cluster 2–Opportunistic section describes offenders using empathy to establish trust, and the Discussion reports some affectionate relationship-building. But the paper does not establish that offenders often presented themselves as confidantes to deepen an emotional connection and sustain engagement; the Discussion instead says sexual tactics were much more frequent than individual grooming tactics. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Sharing pornographic material ultimately functioned to increase victims' compliance with subsequent sexualized requests.

    “This ultimately functioned to increase victims' compliance with subsequent sexualized requests (Kloess et al., 2017; Powell etal., 2021).”

    From Unraveling the Complexities of Offender Strategies as Part of Online Sexual Grooming and Technology-Assisted Child Sexual Abuse: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Powell et al., 2021

    The ‘Prevalence of moves and tactics’ section (p. 7) records offenders sending sexual content, including an example of a sexual request after a video was sent. The Conclusion says offenders shifted discourse strategies to elicit compliance, but the paper does not show that sharing pornographic material increased victims’ compliance with subsequent requests. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In three articles, individuals were reported to make 'false' promises to victims as a way of maintaining ongoing engagement, for example, of a typical romantic relationship.

    “False Promises. In three articles, individuals were further reported to make 'false' promises to victims as a way of maintaining ongoing engagement (Powell etal., 2021; Seymour-Smith & Kloess, 2021; Whittle etal., 2015), for example, of a typical romantic relationship: 'We could date as boyfriend and girlfriend.' (Powell etal., 2021), swiftly followed by requests for”

    From Unraveling the Complexities of Offender Strategies as Part of Online Sexual Grooming and Technology-Assisted Child Sexual Abuse: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Powell et al., 2021

    Table 1 in “Prevalence of moves and tactics” (p. 6) lists “Promises future relationship with child” under “Manages resistance” and gives the quoted boyfriend-and-girlfriend example. The same section describes resistance-management messages as attempts to keep victims engaged. The paper does not establish that the promised relationship was false, so that characterization is not fully supported. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Arranging offline contact sometimes served the purpose of engaging in sexual acts/activities in the physical world, but in other instances appeared to be a strategy to maintain victims' online engagement without any intention of transitioning to a physical meeting.

    “While in some instances this clearly served the purpose of engaging in sexual acts/activities in the physical world (Chiang, 2018; Powell etal., 2021; Shannon, 2008; Whittle etal., 2015), it appeared to be more of a strategy to maintain victims' online engagement in others, without any intention of transitioning to a physical meeting (Kloess etal., 2017, 2019).”

    From Unraveling the Complexities of Offender Strategies as Part of Online Sexual Grooming and Technology-Assisted Child Sexual Abuse: A Systematic Review (2026) · cites this paper as Powell et al., 2021

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable, 1 not checked. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Some individuals used empathy to build trust, demonstrated through prolonged telephone conversations, providing a space for children to feel listened to and validated, and offering advice.

    “Some individuals used empathy to build trust (Powell et al., 2021), demonstrated through actions such as engaging in prolonged telephone conversations, providing a space for children to feel listened to and validated, and offering advice (De Santisteban et al., 2018; Kloess etal., 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Aitken S, Gaskell D & Hodkinson A 2018. Online sexual grooming: Exploratory comparison of themes arising from male offenders' communications with male victims compared to female victims. Deviant Behavior 39: 1170-1190. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2017.1410372 · DOI
  2. Bennett N & O'Donohue W 2014. The construct of grooming in child sexual abuse: Conceptual and measurement issues. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 23: 957-976. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2 014.960632 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bhatia VK 1993. Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Pearson Education
  4. Blanca M, Alarcón R, Arnau J, Bono R & Bendayan R 2018. Effect of variance ratio on ANOVA robustness: Might 1.5 be the limit? Behavior Research Methods 50: 937-962. https://doi. org/10.3758/s13428-017-0918-2 · DOI
  5. Bronfenbrenner U 1979. The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press
  6. Chiang E 2018. Rhetorical moves and identity performance in online child sexual abuse interactions (Doctoral thesis). Aston University, Birmingham, UK. https://research.aston.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/ rhetorical-moves-and-identity-performance-in-online-child-sexual- Chiang E & Grant T 2019. Deceptive identify performance: Offender moves and multiple identities in online abuse conversations. Applied Linguistics 40: 675-698. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy007 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Henshaw M, Darjee R & Clough JA 2020. Online child sexual offending. In I Bryce & W Petherick (eds), Child sexual abuse: Forensic issues in evidence, impact, and management. Academic Press: 85-108
  8. Lorenzo-Dus N & Kinzel A 2019. 'So is your mom as cute as you?': Examining patterns of language use in online sexual grooming of children. Journal of Corpora and Discourse Studies 2: 15-39. https://doi. org/10.18573/jcads. · DOI
  9. Mann RE, Hanson RK & Thornton D 2010. Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment 22: 191-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1079063210366039 · DOI
  10. Mann RE, Webster S, Wakeling HC & Marshall WL 2007. The measurement and influence of child sexual abuse supportive beliefs. Psychology, Crime & Law 13: 443-458. https://doi. org/10.1080/10683160601061141 · DOI

Authors
Powell, M., & Casey, S.
Venue
Australian Institute of Criminology eBooks
Published
2021-12-15
OpenAlex
W4200068577
Cited by
19
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 13
FWCI
6.95
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australian Institute of Criminology eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
Griffith University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Keywords
child sexual offenders, online child sexual exploitation, chat logs, dialogue moves, social media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review