Cited by 57Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactEconomics of Agriculture and Food Markets

The Importance of Quantifying Food Waste in Canada

Open access
Abdulla, Majd, Martin, Ralph, Gooch, Martin, Jovel, Eduardo·2013·Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development

Abstract

Understanding food waste in Canada may offer previously unrecognized opportunities and strategies to address rising food-cost inflation, food insecurity, and negative ecological impacts and energy costs attributable to food production, distribution, and accessibility. It is significant for all agents along the food chain and policy makers to know how much food Canadians waste, as well as why and where. This paper examines food waste at both the consumer and retailer levels. We used data from reports published by Statistics Canada and the World Bank to calculate the amount of food waste from the food available for consumption from 1961 to 2009. The preliminary results of the research show that food waste increased over time in relation to the food available for consumption. The average food waste was estimated at 40 percent of food available for consumption over almost five decades. The conclusion can also be drawn that food waste is positively correlated with per capital GDP and per capita income. We present recommendations for quantifying food waste and understanding the combination of reasons and factors that drive up food waste.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5304/jafscd.2013.032.018

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study carried out in Canada analysing food waste data between 1961 and 2009 found that red meat accounted for 39.73% of the total waste and poultry waste was estimated to be around 40.74%.

    “Furthermore, a study carried out in Canada analysing food waste data between 1961 and 2009 found that red meat accounted for 39.73% of the total waste and poultry waste was estimated to be around 40.74% [92].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

12 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdulla, M., Martin, R., Gooch, M., & Jovel, E.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Guelph (CA)
Venue
Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
Published
2013-04-01
Pages
137-151
ISSN
  • 2152-0798 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-0801
OpenAlex
W2327857756
Cited by
57
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
Keywords
food waste, food waste quantification, consumer food waste, retail food waste, GDP per capita, per capita income, food insecurity, Canada

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review