Cited by 17Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchVisual perception and processing mechanismsChild and Animal Learning Development

Reduced Context Updating but Intact Visual Priors in Autism

Open access
Randeniya, R., Vilares, I., Mattingley, J. B., Garrido, M. I.·2021·Computational Psychiatry

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

A general consensus persists that sensory-perceptual differences in autism, such as hypersensitivities to light or sound, result from an overreliance on new (rather than prior) sensory observations. However, conflicting Bayesian accounts of autism remain unresolved as to whether such alterations are caused by more precise sensory observations (precise likelihood model) or by forming a less precise model of the sensory context (hypo-priors model). We used a decision-under-uncertainty paradigm that manipulated uncertainty in both likelihoods and priors. Contrary to model predictions we found no differences in reliance on likelihood in autistic group (AS) compared to neurotypicals (NT) and found no differences in subjective prior variance between groups. However, we found reduced context adjustment in the AS group compared to NT. Further, the AS group showed heightened variability in their relative weighting of sensory information (vs. prior) on a trial-by-trial basis. When participants were aligned on a continuum of autistic traits, we found no associations with likelihood reliance or prior variance but found an increase in likelihood precision with autistic traits. These findings together provide empirical evidence for intact priors, precise likelihood, reduced context updating and heightened variability during sensory learning in autism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5334/cpsy.69

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent study by Shi et al. investigated prior updating in ASD using the central tendency effect in combination with Kalman, finding an initial underweighting of priors in autistic adults that normalised by the end of the task.

    “For example, a recent study by Shi et al. [5] investigated prior updating in ASD using the central tendency effect in combination with Kalman. They found an initial underweighting of priors in autistic adults, resonating with some previous findings indicating atypical priors [13, 56], which normalised by the end of the task, resonating with contrasting previous findings of intact priors in ASD [57”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Randeniya, R., Vilares, I., Mattingley, J. B., & Garrido, M. I.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Randeniya, R.
Venue
Computational Psychiatry
Published
2021-12-29
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
140
ISSN
2379-6227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4226266233
Cited by
17
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Computational Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • University of Queensland (2016000071)
  • Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function, Australian Research Council (CE140100007)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, Bayesian models of perception, prior variance, context updating, sensory learning, decision making under uncertainty, autistic traits, sensory hypersensitivity, perceptual variability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review