Editorial: Enhancing Student Engagement Through Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Basics, Opportunities, and Challenges
Open accessAbstract
The proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and chatbots has the potential to significantly reshape higher education. It is now imperative for stakeholders in this sector to grasp the fundamental aspects of AI technologies and understand their implications. This paper not only introduces basic AI concepts but also explains their specific applications and relevance in the higher education context. Moreover, it outlines the prospects of using AI technologies and chatbots to boost student engagement, presenting a synthesis of the opportunities available. Concurrently, we discuss the concerns and challenges associated with integrating AI into higher education settings. Several articles included in this special issue explore these opportunities and challenges from diverse viewpoints and within various contexts, across countries such as Australia, the United Kingdom, Vietnam, Cyprus, and GCC nations. Finally, we propose several avenues for future research aimed at enhancing student engagement through AI, charting a path forward for empirical evidence and practical application of AI and chatbots in enhancing student engagement.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This editorial introduces a JUTLP special issue on enhancing student engagement through AI and chatbots, explaining basic AI/ML/deep learning and generative AI concepts in higher education. It synthesizes opportunities (intelligent tutoring, personalised learning, accessibility) and challenges (data privacy, algorithmic bias, academic integrity) and proposes future research directions.
Key findings
As an editorial, it synthesizes rather than reports primary results:
- AI, ML, and DL are nested concepts; ML applied to early engagement data can identify students at risk of failing "as early as the fourth week of the Fall semester" (citing Gray & Perkins, 2019).
- GenAI/LLMs can serve as teaching assistants, generate personalised content and feedback, and support accessibility (e.g., auto-generated captions, real-time translation), but full personalisation requires deeper integration of educational theory.
- Key concerns: data privacy, algorithmic bias disadvantaging students by race, gender, or socioeconomic status, and threats to academic integrity and critical thinking from over-reliance on AI-generated content.
- The special issue comprises "a commentary and seven articles" spanning Australia, the United Kingdom, Vietnam, Cyprus, and GCC nations.
Methods
Not stated in the paper (editorial synthesis; no empirical design, sample, or analysis reported). It reviews prior literature and summarises the special issue's contributions.
Limitations
Not stated in the paper. Evident from the text: it is a conceptual editorial without primary data, and its claims about AI's benefits and risks are drawn from cited secondary sources rather than new evidence; the proposed research directions (adaptive systems, ethical AI, collaborative learning, longitudinal studies) remain unaddressed by the paper itself.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 53 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation
Successful implementation of AI in higher education requires overcoming significant obstacles.
“While these technologies offer great promise, educators and institutions will need to overcome significant obstacles for successful implementation (Crawford, Cowling, & Allen, 2023;Perkins, 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Crawford, Cowling, & Allen, 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Perkins, 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
AI technologies and chatbots have the potential to significantly reshape higher education.
“The proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and chatbots has the potential to significantly reshape higher education.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · boosted
“Despite these hurdles, the disruptive potential of emerging technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI) is undeniable (Crawford, Cowling, & Allen, 2023;Kelly et al., 2023;Lodge et al., 2023), offering new horizons for learning and teaching practices.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Crawford, Cowling, & Allen, 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kelly et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lodge et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § Introduction · boosted
- Premisecitation
Deep learning application in education is promising for analysing learners' cognitive and emotional processes.
“The application of deep learning in education is particularly promising for analysing learners' cognitive and emotional processes, with studies by Nguyen et al. (2022) and Tzirakis et al. (2017) highlighting its potential.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Nguyen et al. (2022)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tzirakis et al. (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Machine learning algorithms can dynamically adjust the learning environment in real-time, providing each student with a customised learning trajectory that optimally supports their progress and engagement.
“Moreover, machine learning algorithms can dynamically adjust the learning environment in real-time, providing each student with a customised learning trajectory that optimally supports their progress and engagement (Ninaus et al., 2019;Raj & Renumol, 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ninaus et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Raj & Renumol, 2022
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Applying machine learning techniques to early learning engagement data can identify students at risk of failing as early as the fourth week of the Fall semester.
“For instance, Gray and Perkins (2019) demonstrated that by applying machine learning techniques to early learning engagement data, it is feasible to identify students at risk of failing as early as the fourth week of the Fall semester.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gray and Perkins (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
AI systems can significantly enhance learning and teaching processes.
“In the educational sphere, AI systems can significantly enhance learning and teaching processes (Järvelä et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Järvelä et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
AI tools utilising LLMs complement human skills to enhance productivity, creativity, and efficiency in academic writing tasks.
“This research provides insights into how AI tools utilising LLMs are being integrated into the writing process, highlighting the ways in which these technologies complement human skills to enhance productivity, creativity, and efficiency in academic writing tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nguyen et al. (2024)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Limited uptake of ITS can be attributed to challenges including technological accessibility, the digital divide, and pedagogical integration.
“This limited uptake could be attributed to several challenges, including issues related to technological accessibility, the digital divide, and pedagogical integration (Nguyen, 2022;Nguyen, Hong, et al., 2020;Strobl et al., 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Nguyen, 2022
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nguyen, Hong, et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Strobl et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
These factors collectively hinder the broader adoption of ITS in formal education.
“These factors collectively hinder the broader adoption of ITS in formal education.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Technological accessibility concerns arise from substantial resources required to implement and maintain ITS, which can be a barrier in under-resourced educational environments.
“Technological accessibility concerns arise from the substantial resources required to implement and maintain ITS, which can be a barrier in under-resourced educational environments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
MLLMs allow for the creation of targeted interventions that cater to specific learning requirements.
“This allows for the creation of targeted interventions that cater to specific learning requirements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) provide immediate, personalised feedback and support to learners, akin to one-on-one tutoring.
“Decades of research into Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) have established that these systems employ to provide immediate, personalised feedback and support to learners, akin to one-on-one tutoring.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Mousavinasab et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tchounikine et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
MLLMs enable detailed analysis of educational data, helping researchers identify patterns and trends that inform more effective teaching strategies and learning interventions.
“These tools enable the detailed analysis of educational data, helping researchers identify patterns and trends that inform more effective teaching strategies and learning interventions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Whitehead et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
ITS have not seen widespread adoption in formal educational settings across many countries.
“However, despite their potential, Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) have not seen widespread adoption in formal educational settings across many countries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Nguyen, 2022
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nguyen, Hong, et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Strobl et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Educators can gain deeper insights into student behaviours, engagement levels, and learning outcomes by leveraging MLLMs.
“By leveraging MLLMs, educators can gain deeper insights into student behaviours, engagement levels, and learning outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The digital divide exacerbates the issue, as disparities in access to technology limit the availability of ITS to all students.
“The digital divide further exacerbates this issue, as disparities in access to technology limit the availability of ITS to all students.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Recent advancements in learning analytics have highlighted the potential of MLLMs to support research in the learning process.
“Furthermore, recent advancements in learning analytics have highlighted the potential of MLLMs to support research in the learning process (Whitehead et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Whitehead et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Widespread availability of GenAI, coupled with its advanced capabilities and ease of access and adoption, has introduced new affordances to teaching and learning.
“Recently, the widespread availability of GenAI, coupled with its advanced capabilities and ease of access and adoption, has introduced new affordances to teaching and learning (Enriquez et al., 2023;Nguyen et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Enriquez et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nguyen et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Integrating ITS effectively into existing pedagogical frameworks poses a significant challenge.
“Additionally, integrating ITS effectively into existing pedagogical frameworks poses another significant challenge, as educators must align these advanced systems with traditional teaching methods and curricular goals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
AI technologies such as natural language processing and speech recognition can make learning materials more accessible to students with disabilities.
“Furthermore, AI technologies, such as natural language processing and speech recognition, can make learning materials more accessible to students with disabilities (Nguyen et al., 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nguyen et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The key challenge remains the static nature of the resources, which fails to dynamically adapt to the evolving needs of individual learners.
“The key challenge remains the static nature of the resources, which fails to dynamically adapt to the evolving needs of individual learners.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Personalised learning systems have not been broadly integrated into mainstream educational settings.
“Yet, similar to ITS, these personalised learning systems have not been broadly integrated into mainstream educational settings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Significant resources needed to put personalised learning into practice make it challenging to adopt on a large scale.
“While personalised learning has been acknowledged as an effective method that customises educational experiences to meet the specific needs of individual learners (Xie et al., 2019;Zheng et al., 2021), the significant resources needed to put this model into practice make it challenging to adopt on a large scale (Nguyen, Gardner, et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nguyen, Gardner, et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Advent of technology and new learning platforms such as MOOCs has advanced the concept of personalised learning by providing scalable educational resources.
“The advent of technology and new learning platforms, such as Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs), has advanced the concept of personalised learning by providing scalable educational resources (Fan et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fan et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
GenAI enables educators and students to engage with content in innovative ways that were previously unattainable.
“These technological advancements enable educators and students to engage with content in innovative ways that were previously unattainable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Bias can affect assessments, recommendations, and the personalization of learning experiences, potentially disadvantaging students based on race, gender, or socioeconomic status.
“This can affect assessments, recommendations, and the personalization of learning experiences, potentially disadvantaging students based on race, gender, or socioeconomic status.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Another significant ethical issue is the potential for bias in AI algorithms.
“Another significant ethical issue is the potential for bias in AI algorithms (Baker & Hawn, 2021).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baker & Hawn, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Integration of AI technologies in educational settings poses challenges to academic integrity.
“Moreover, the integration of AI technologies in educational settings also poses challenges to academic integrity (Kasneci et al., 2023;Kishore et al., 2023;Nguyen et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Kasneci et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kishore et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nguyen et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
AI systems can inadvertently perpetuate existing biases present in their training data, leading to unfair treatment of certain student groups.
“These systems can inadvertently perpetuate existing biases present in their training data, leading to unfair treatment of certain student groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baker & Hawn, 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Use of AI in education often requires the collection and analysis of large amounts of personal data from students, including learning patterns, performance metrics, and potentially sensitive information.
“The use of AI in education often requires the collection and analysis of large amounts of personal data from students, including learning patterns, performance metrics, and potentially sensitive information.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 33
- May combine two claims. 27
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe integration of digital technology into higher education has been met with both enthusiasm and skepticism, characterised by challenges such as user resistance, lack of necessary skills, policy complications, and ethical and privacy concerns.
“The invasion of digital technology into higher education, spanning several decades, has been met with both enthusiasm and skepticism, characterised by challenges such as user resistance, lack of necessary skills, policy complications, and ethical and privacy concerns (Essien et al., 2024;Nguyen, Gardner, et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Essien et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nguyen, Gardner, et al., 2020
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStrategies that bridge skill gaps, consider ethical implications, and ensure alignment with existing policies are required for AI integration in higher education.
“This requires strategies that bridge skill gaps, carefully consider ethical implications, and ensure alignment with existing policies (Nguyen et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nguyen et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAI systems such as intelligent tutoring systems, adaptive learning systems, or personalised learning platforms can customize instruction, provide timely feedback, and aid in developing adaptive learning resources tailored to individual student needs.
“They might include intelligent tutoring systems (ITS), adaptive learning systems, or personalised learning platforms, which can customize instruction, provide timely feedback to learners, and aid in developing adaptive learning resources tailored to individual student needs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenGenerative AI can be used to create personalised learning resources, model real-life situations for hands-on learning, and develop detailed simulations or models for scientific investigation.
“In educational environments, this type of AI can be used to create personalised learning resources, model real-life situations for hands-on learning, and develop detailed simulations or models for scientific investigation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenGenerative AI can formulate mathematical or physics practice questions, construct historical recreations, or develop language exercises that adjust to a student's level of proficiency.
“For instance, generative AI can formulate mathematical or physics practice questions, construct historical recreations, or develop language exercises that adjust to a student's level of proficiency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMultimodal deep learning approaches have been explored for predicting intricate learning activities, such as shared regulation during collaborative learning.
“For example, multimodal deep learning approaches have been explored for predicting intricate learning activities, such as those involved in shared regulation during collaborative learning scenarios.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nguyen et al. (2022)
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningAI, machine learning, and deep learning advancements offer potential to deeply understand and enhance the learning process based on individual learner data and interactions.
“These technological advancements in AI, machine learning, and deep learning open new horizons for personalised and adaptive learning experiences in education, offering the potential to deeply understand and enhance the learning process based on individual learner data and interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenGenerative AI and M-LLMs have profound implications for learning and teaching.
“Generative AI (GenAI) and (Multimodal-)Large Language Models (M-LLMs) represent significant advancements in the field of artificial intelligence, offering profound implications for learning and teaching.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone givenRecent advancements in AI, particularly generative AI, have a transformative impact on higher education.
“The recent advancements in AI, particularly with generative AI, emphasise the transformative impact on higher education, raising critical questions about the future of learning and teaching with AI technologies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenGenerative AI and M-LLMs have the potential to revolutionise educational practices by providing innovative tools for content creation, personalised learning, and interactive engagement.
“These technologies have the potential to revolutionise educational practices by providing innovative tools for content creation, personalised learning, and interactive engagement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI has potential in facilitating adaptive learning systems, personalisation, and intelligent tutoring systems, catering to diverse learning needs and styles.
“Furthermore, the comprehensive review by Zawacki-Richter et al. (2019) emphasised AI's potential in facilitating adaptive learning systems, personalisation, and intelligent tutoring systems, underscoring the technology's capability to cater to diverse learning needs and styles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zawacki-Richter et al. (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenLLMs can comprehend and produce text in ways that are contextually relevant and syntactically coherent, making them particularly useful for a variety of educational applications.
“These models can comprehend and produce text in ways that are contextually relevant and syntactically coherent, making them particularly useful for a variety of educational applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationDeployment of AI in educational contexts introduces ethical concerns, including data privacy, bias in AI algorithms, and implications of AI-mediated interactions on student learning experience.
“However, the deployment of AI in educational contexts also introduces ethical concerns, including data privacy, bias in AI algorithms, and the implications of AI-mediated interactions on the student learning experience (Essien et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Essien et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI has the capacity to unveil critical indicators previously overlooked by stakeholders at various levels of the educational hierarchy, suggesting a transformative role in shaping strategic decisions and educational outcomes.
“Nguyen et al. (2020) highlighted the capacity of AI to unveil critical indicators previously overlooked by stakeholders at various levels of the educational hierarchy, suggesting a transformative role for AI in shaping strategic decisions and educational outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nguyen et al. (2020)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAI advancements demonstrate potential for revolutionary change in education, creating learner-centred environments that could significantly boost student engagement.
“These advancements demonstrate the potential for a revolutionary change in education, creating learner-centred environments that could significantly boost student engagement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLLMs can support personalised learning by offering tutoring or feedback on written assignments, generating practice essay prompts, and facilitating language learning through conversation simulations.
“LLMs can support personalised learning by offering tutoring or feedback on written assignments, generating practice essay prompts, and facilitating language learning through conversation simulations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationMachine learning can be harnessed for learning analytics to analyse student data, offering personalised instruction recommendations, identifying trends in student behaviour, and forecasting academic performance.
“Within the context of education, machine learning can be harnessed for learning analytics to analyse vast amounts of student data, offering personalised instruction recommendations, identifying trends in student behaviour, and forecasting academic performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningGenerative AI allows educators to offer varied, engaging, and customised learning experiences.
“This technology allows educators to offer varied, engaging, and customised learning experiences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIncorporation of AI technology in higher education to enhance student engagement offers immersive opportunities but also presents several challenges that need to be addressed.
“The incorporation of AI technology in higher education to enhance student engagement offers immersive opportunities but also presents several challenges that need to be addressed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningMLLMs have the potential to transform educational content delivery by making it more interactive and engaging.
“MLLMs have the potential to transform educational content delivery by making it more interactive and engaging.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAn MLLM can analyse a scientific text and generate corresponding visual aids, such as diagrams or animations, to help students better understand complex concepts.
“For example, an MLLM can analyse a scientific text and generate corresponding visual aids, such as diagrams or animations, to help students better understand complex concepts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMLLMs increase the accuracy of educational research and enhance the quality of the learning experiences provided.
“This method not only increases the accuracy of educational research but also enhances the quality of the learning experiences provided.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLLMs can assist in the creation of instructional content, summarise academic texts, and help in drafting research papers or educational resources, thereby reducing the workload on educators and enabling more focused and effective teaching strategies.
“Additionally, LLMs can assist in the creation of instructional content, summarise academic texts, and even help in drafting research papers or educational resources, thereby reducing the workload on educators and enabling more focused and effective teaching strategies (Dwivedi et al., 2023;Nguyen et al., 2024).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dwivedi et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nguyen et al., 2024
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationITS can assess student submissions, identify errors, and provide targeted feedback to help students improve.
“These systems can assess student submissions, identify errors, and provide targeted feedback to help students improve (Mousavinasab et al., 2021;Tchounikine et al., 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Mousavinasab et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Tchounikine et al., 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMultimodal approach caters to visual learners and can aid in the retention of information by providing multiple reference points for understanding material.
“This multimodal approach caters to visual learners and can aid in the retention of information by providing multiple reference points for understanding material.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationITS can enhance student engagement and lead to learning outcomes by offering support tailored to the student's current level of understanding.
“By offering support that is tailored to the student's current level of understanding, ITS can enhance student engagement and lead to learning outcomes (VanLehn, 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites VanLehn, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA recent study by Nguyen et al. (2024) demonstrated patterns of collaboration between humans and AI in AI-assisted academic writing.
“A recent study by Nguyen et al. (2024) has demonstrated the patterns of collaboration between humans and AI in AI-assisted academic writing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nguyen et al. (2024)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBy generating personalised content, assessments, and feedback dynamically, GenAI supports a variety of learning styles and schedules, thereby increasing engagement and making education more responsive to the diverse needs and lifestyles of students.
“By generating personalised content, assessments, and feedback dynamically, GenAI supports a variety of learning styles and schedules, thereby increasing engagement and making education more responsive to the diverse needs and lifestyles of students.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIntegration of AI, particularly Generative AI, into education brings substantial benefits but also raises significant ethical issues and challenges to academic integrity.
“The integration of AI, particularly Generative AI, into education brings substantial benefits but also raises significant ethical issues and challenges to academic integrity that need to be thoughtfully examined and managed (Crawford, Cowling, & Allen, 2023;Holmes et al., 2021;Nguyen et al., 2023).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Crawford, Cowling, & Allen, 2023
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Holmes et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nguyen et al., 2023
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningRecent availability of GenAI technologies has further propelled the personalised learning experience by facilitating real-time interactions with each learner.
“The recent availability of GenAI technologies has further propelled the personalised learning experience by facilitating real-time interactions with each learner.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenMOOC resources are often static and do not truly cater to the unique needs of each learner.
“However, these resources are often static and do not truly cater to the unique needs of each learner.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPersonalised learning is an effective method that customises educational experiences to meet the specific needs of individual learners.
“While personalised learning has been acknowledged as an effective method that customises educational experiences to meet the specific needs of individual learners (Xie et al., 2019;Zheng et al., 2021), the significant resources needed to put this model into practice make it challenging to adopt on a large scale (Nguyen, Gardner, et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Xie et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zheng et al., 2021
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNumerous studies have explored the development of personalised learning, resulting in various prototypes that aim to enhance its feasibility and effectiveness.
“Numerous studies have explored the development of personalised learning, resulting in various prototypes that aim to enhance its feasibility and effectiveness (Denny et al., 2015;Hsieh et al., 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Denny et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hsieh et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenGenAI can assist in evaluating students' work by examining written assignments, presentations, and spoken responses, providing comprehensive feedback that covers both textual and auditory elements.
“Moreover, GenAI can assist in evaluating students' work by examining written assignments, presentations, and spoken responses, providing comprehensive feedback that covers both the textual and auditory elements of the content.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGenAI accessibility allows for broader integration into various educational settings, supporting a more dynamic and responsive learning environment.
“This accessibility allows for broader integration into various educational settings, supporting a more dynamic and responsive learning environment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAI-powered tools can automatically generate captions for lecture videos or provide realtime language translation, removing barriers to access and engagement for a broader spectrum of students.
“For instance, AI-powered tools can automatically generate captions for lecture videos or provide realtime language translation, removing barriers to access and engagement for a broader spectrum of students.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGenerative AI is transforming the educational field, making it more interactive and adaptable to the needs of today's learners.
“Thus, generative AI is transforming the educational field, making it more interactive and adaptable to the needs of today's learners.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningGenAI can serve as dynamic teaching assistants, offering educators a range of tools to enhance their teaching methods.
“GenAI can serve as dynamic teaching assistants, offering educators a range of tools to enhance their teaching methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningGenAI capability to provide instantaneous feedback and tailor learning materials according to individual student needs represents a transformative step towards true personalised learning.
“This capability of GenAI to provide instantaneous feedback and tailor learning materials according to individual student needs represents a transformative step towards true personalised learning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGenAI enhances educational accessibility and convenience, allowing students to interact with learning materials anytime and anywhere.
“Moreover, GenAI enhances educational accessibility and convenience, allowing students to interact with learning materials anytime and anywhere.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRound-the-clock availability of tailored educational resources through GenAI makes learning more accessible and substantially enriches the overall learning experience.
“This round-the-clock availability of tailored educational resources through GenAI not only makes learning more accessible but also substantially enriches the overall learning experience.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningTeachers can use GenAI to create diverse educational materials that incorporate text, visuals, and audio, making lessons more dynamic and engaging.
“Teachers can use GenAI to create diverse educational materials that incorporate text, visuals, and audio, making lessons more dynamic and engaging.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThis flexibility is particularly beneficial for learners who need to balance educational pursuits with other commitments or those who prefer studying outside conventional classroom settings.
“This flexibility is particularly beneficial for learners who need to balance educational pursuits with other commitments or those who prefer studying outside conventional classroom settings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationInstitutional leadership plays a crucial role in ensuring the ethical deployment and management of ChatGPT by establishing standards and practices that prioritize transparency, accountability, and the protection of user data.
“Institutional leadership plays a crucial role in ensuring the ethical deployment and management of ChatGPT by establishing standards and practices that prioritize transparency, accountability, and the protection of user data (Crawford, Cowling, & Allen, 2023).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Crawford, Cowling, & Allen, 2023
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningReliance on AI tools raises concerns about students' development of critical thinking and problem-solving skills, as the ease of access to information might deter deeper engagement with learning materials.
“This reliance on AI tools also raises concerns about students' development of critical thinking and problem-solving skills, as the ease of access to information might deter deeper engagement with learning materials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenOne of the foremost ethical concerns involves data privacy.
“One of the foremost ethical concerns involves data privacy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningAs students increasingly rely on AI-generated content, there is a risk that it could facilitate academic dishonesty, making it difficult to ascertain whether work submitted is truly indicative of a student's own understanding and effort.
“As students increasingly rely on AI-generated content, there is a risk that it could facilitate academic dishonesty, making it difficult to ascertain whether work submitted is truly indicative of a student's own understanding and effort.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many educators appreciate GenAI's potential for enhancing efficiency and streamlining processes.
“The literature highlights that many educators appreciate GenAI’s potential for enhancing efficiency and streamlining processes [55].”
From Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and Integrity (2025) · cites this paper as [55]
The “Interactive Teaching Aids” section says GenAI can help educators create materials and evaluate students’ work, and the “Generative AI and (Multimodal-) Large Language Models” section describes greater efficiency in academic writing. These passages support potential efficiency benefits, but they do not establish that many educators appreciate those benefits or view GenAI as streamlining their processes. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe reliability and accuracy of AI models raise ethical and epistemological concerns that impact the development of critical skills, as students may internalize information without a rigorous assessment process.
“the reliability and accuracy of AI models raise ethical and epistemological concerns that impact the development of critical skills, as students may internalize information without a rigorous assessment process”
From Determining Factors for the Development of Critical Thinking in Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as Nguyen et al. 2024
Cites
ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., et al. (2023) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274 · Cited by 7,326 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Moreover, the integration of AI technologies in educational settings also poses challenges to academic integrity (Kasneci et al., 2023; Kishore et al., 2023; Nguyen et al., 2024).”
BackgroundZawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 · Cited by 7,242 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Furthermore, the comprehensive review by Zawacki-Richter et al. (2019) emphasised AI's potential in facilitating adaptive learning systems, personalisation, and intelligent tutoring systems, underscoring the technology's capability to cater to diverse learning needs and styles.”
BackgroundDwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., et al. (2023) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642 · Cited by 4,584 · see citing works
Ethics of AI in Education: Towards a Community-Wide Framework
Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, S. B., Santos, O. C., Rodrigo, M. T., Cukurova, M., Bittencourt, I. I., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-021-00239-1 · Cited by 1,437 · see citing works
Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education
Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B.-P. T. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w · Cited by 1,228 · cited 5× · see citing works
“…integration of AI, particularly Generative AI, into education brings substantial benefits but also raises significant ethical issues and challenges to academic integrity that need to be thoughtfully examined and managed (Crawford, Cowling, & Allen, 2023; Holmes et al., 2021; Nguyen et al., 2023).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationBaker, R. S., & Hawn, A. (2022) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9 · Cited by 993 · see citing works
Perkins, M. (2023) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.20.02.07 · Cited by 839 · see citing works
End-to-End Multimodal Emotion Recognition using Deep Neural Networks
Tzirakis, P., Trigeorgis, G., Nicolaou, M. A., Schuller, B., & Zafeiriou, S. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.08619 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
Xie, H., Chu, H.-C., Hwang, G.-J., & Wang, C.-C. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103599 · Cited by 713 · see citing works
Mousavinasab, E., Zarifsanaiey, N., R. Niakan Kalhori, S., Rakhshan, M., Keikha, L., & Ghazi Saeedi, M. (2021) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2018.1558257 · Cited by 605 · see citing works
Crawford, J., Cowling, M., & Allen, K.-A. (2023) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.20.3.02 · Cited by 547 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…integration of AI, particularly Generative AI, into education brings substantial benefits but also raises significant ethical issues and challenges to academic integrity that need to be thoughtfully examined and managed (Crawford, Cowling, & Allen, 2023; Holmes et al., 2021; Nguyen et al., 2023).”
BackgroundInfluentialHuman-AI collaboration patterns in AI-assisted academic writing
Nguyen, A., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Huang, X. (2024) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2024.2323593 · Cited by 449 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Recently, the widespread availability of GenAI, coupled with its advanced capabilities and ease of access and adoption, has introduced new affordances to teaching and learning (Enriquez et al., 2023; Nguyen et al., 2024).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationHuman and artificial intelligence collaboration for socially shared regulation in learning
Järvelä, S., Nguyen, A., & Hadwin, A. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13325 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Self-citationDigital support for academic writing: A review of technologies and pedagogies
Strobl, C., Ailhaud, E., Benetos, K., Devitt, A., Kruse, O., Proske, A., & Rapp, C. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.12.005 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
The influence of AI text generators on critical thinking skills in UK business schools
Essien, A., Bukoye, O. T., O’Dea, X., & Kremantzis, M. (2024) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2024.2316881 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Self-citationUtilizing early engagement and machine learning to predict student outcomes
Gray, C., & Perkins, D. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.12.006 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Ninaus, M., Greipl, S., Kiili, K. J. M., Lindstedt, A., Huber, S., Klein, E., Karnath, H., & Moeller, K. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103641 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Kelly, A., Sullivan, M., & Strampel, K. (2023) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.20.6.12 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and Authorship Editor Policy: ChatGPT, Bard Bing AI, and beyond
Crawford, J., Cowling, M., Ashton-Hay, S. A., Kelder, J., Middleton, R., & Wilson, G. (2023) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.20.5.01 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Data Analytics in Higher Education: An Integrated View
Nguyen, A., Gardner, L. A., & Sheridan, D. (2020) · Journal of Information Systems Education · doi:10.62273/aivn9816 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Self-citationLearning with Generative Artificial Intelligence Within a Network of Co-Regulation
Lodge, J. M., De Barba, P., & Broadbent, J. (2024) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.20.7.02 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
A Fuzzy Logic-based Personalized Learning System for Supporting Adaptive English Learning
Hsieh, T. C., Wang, T.-I., Su, C., & Lee, M.-C. (2012) · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Dissecting learning tactics in MOOC using ordered network analysis
Fan, Y., Tan, Y., Raković, M., Wang, Y., Cai, Z., Shaffer, D. W., & Gašević, D. (2022) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12735 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Computer Supported Collaborative Learning and Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Tchounikine, P., Rummel, N., & McLaren, B. M. (2010) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14363-2_22 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Nguyen, A., Gardner, L. A., & Sheridan, D. (2018) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12625 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationRaj, N. S., & Renumol, V. G. (2022) · E-Learning and Digital Media · doi:10.1177/20427530221108027 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Zheng, L., Zhong, L., Niu, J., Long, M., & Zhao, J. (2021) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Denny, J. C., Spickard, A., Speltz, P., Porier, R., Rosenstiel, D., & Powers, J. S. (2015) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.06.004 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Generative AI and composing: an intergenerational conversation among literacy scholars
Enriquez, G., Gill, V., Campano, G., Flores, T. T., Jones, S., Leander, K. M., McKnight, L., & Price-Dennis, D. (2024) · English Teaching: Practice & Critique · doi:10.1108/etpc-08-2023-0104 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Nguyen, A. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-89594-5_14 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationA Taxonomy of Digital Learning Activities for Digital Inclusion.
Nguyen, A., Hong, Y., & Gardner, L. A. (2020) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationKishore, S., Hong, Y., Nguyen, A., & Qutab, S. (2023) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Nguyen, A., Järvelä, S., Wang, Y., & Róse, C. (2022). Exploring Socially Shared Regulation with an AI Deep Learning Approach Using Multimodal Data. Proceedings of International Conferences of Learning Sciences (ICLS). https://2022.isls.org/proceedings/
- Whitehead, R., Nguyen, A., & Järvelä, S. (2024). The Generative Multimodal Analysis (GMA) Methodology for Studying Socially Shared Regulation in Collaborative Learning. The International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK24). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ridwan- Whitehead/publication/378964778_The_Generative_Multimodal_Analysis_GMA_Method ology_for_Studying_Socially_Shared_Regulation_in_Collaborative_Learning/links/65f34f 211f0aec67e28fd7d9/The-Generative-Multimodal-Analysis-GMA-Methodology-for- Studying-Socially-Shared-Regulation-in-Collaborative-Learning.pdf
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and Integrity
Francis, N. J., Jones, S., & Smith, D. P. (2025) · British Journal of Biomedical Science · doi:10.3389/bjbs.2024.14048 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
“The literature highlights that many educators appreciate GenAI ’ s potential for enhancing ef fi ciency and streamlining processes [55].”
Dang, B., Huynh, T.-N., Gul, F., Rosé, C. P., Järvelä, S., & Nguyen, A. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13607 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Self-citationMastering knowledge: the impact of generative AI on student learning outcomes
Pallant, J. L., Blijlevens, J., Campbell, A., & Jopp, R. (2026) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2025.2487570 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Study on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Student Learning Outcomes
Sasikala, P., & Ravichandran, R. (2024) · Journal of Digital Learning and Education · doi:10.52562/jdle.v4i2.1234 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Generative artificial intelligence and sustainable higher education: Mapping the potential
Νικολοπούλου, Κ. (2025) · Journal of Digital Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/jdet/15860 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
The Roles of Artificial Intelligence in Teaching Anatomy: A Systematic Review
Joseph, T. S., Gowrie, S., Montalbano, M. J., Bandelow, S., Clunes, M. T., Dumont, A. S., Iwanaga, J., Tubbs, R. S., & Loukas, M. (2025) · Clinical Anatomy · doi:10.1002/ca.24272 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Determining Factors for the Development of Critical Thinking in Higher Education
Jaramillo Gómez, D. L., Álvarez Maestre, A. J., Parada Trujillo, A. E., Pérez Fuentes, C. A., Bedoya Ortiz, D. H., & Sanabria Alarcón, R. K. (2025) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence13060059 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
“Furthermore, the reliability and accuracy of AI models raise ethical and epistemological concerns that impact the development of critical skills, as students may internalize information without a rigorous assessment process (Jasmadi et al. 2024; Nguyen et al. 2024).”
Essien, A. E., Salami, A., Ajala, O., Adebisi, B., Shodiya, A., & Essien, G. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00352-3 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationNguyen, A., Gul, F., Dang, B., Huynh, T.-N., & Tuunanen, T. (2025) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2025.2499177 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationJie, A. L. X., & Kamrozzaman, N. A. (2024) · Open Journal of Social Sciences · doi:10.4236/jss.2024.1210025 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Weber, F., Wambsganss, T., & Söllner, M. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13529 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Wang, Y., & Wang, H. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1477470 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Uppal, K., & Hajian, S. (2024) · European Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.12973/eu-jer.14.1.199 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Zaimoğlu, S., & Dağtaş, A. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15091202 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Exploring Student Interactions with AI in Programming Training
Fenu, G., Galici, R., Marras, M., & Recupero, D. R. (2024) · ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP) · doi:10.1145/3631700.3665227 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Students’ Perceptions on The Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools As Academic Support
Khairuddin, Z., Shahabani, N. S., Ahmad, S. N., Ahmad, A. R., & Zamri, N. A. B. (2024) · Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH) · doi:10.47405/mjssh.v9i11.3087 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Lu, K., Zhu, J., Pang, F., & Shadiev, R. (2024) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-024-10434-1 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Hastomo, T., Sari, A. S., Widiati, U., Ivone, F. M., Zen, E. L., & Andianto, A. (2025) · World Journal of English Language · doi:10.5430/wjel.v15n7p93 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Karamuk, E. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0122-8.ch007 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
How does students' perception of ChatGPT shape online learning engagement and performance?
Mehrvarz, M., Salimi, G., Abdoli, S., & McLaren, B. M. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100459 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Beyond Technology Tools: Supporting Student Engagement in Technology Enhanced Learning
Rotar, O. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15121617 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
The Role of AI in Improving Student Learning Outcomes: Evidence in Vietnam
Trang, N. T. Q., & Thu, P. T. (2024) · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS · doi:10.47191/ijmra/v7-i06-48 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
The shifting landscape of student engagement: A pre-post semester analysis in AI-enhanced classrooms
Bognár, L., & Khine, M. S. (2025) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100395 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Nguyen, A., Duong, A. T., Nguyen, D. T. B., Lai, V. T. T., & Dang, B. (2025) · Information and Learning Sciences · doi:10.1108/ils-11-2024-0148 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citationUsing Intelligent Tutoring Systems to Enhance Student Engagement
Aarthi, S., Ravikumar, R. N., o'g'li, K. S. S., Ismailov, A., & Khujaniyozova, O. R. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-1827-1.ch008 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Mzwri, K., & Turcsányi-Szabó, M. (2025) · Journal of Computers in Education · doi:10.1007/s40692-025-00367-w · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Buniel, J. M. C., Intano, J. A., Cuartero, O., Grustan, K. J. C., Sumaoy, R. C., REYES, N. S. D. L., Calipayan, J. P., Arreo, R. P., Duero, D., Rosil, I., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1535466 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Tran, P. T. H., Huynh, L., Bien, T. A., Dang, B., & Nguyen, A. (2025) · Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/21532974.2025.2583516 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationMariyono, D., Hidayatullah, A. N. A., & Kamila, A. N. A. (2025) · Chemistry Research and Practice · doi:10.64030/3065-906x.02.02.01 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Pu, I., Ravi, P., Dinh, L. D., Joe, C., Ogoe, C., Li, Z., Breazeal, C., & Ostrowski, A. K. (2025) · ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) · doi:10.1145/3713043.3727057 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Benefits, Challenges, and Attitudes Toward ChatGPT in English Writing Courses at Saudi Universities
Alqahtani, N. S. (2024) · International Journal of Language and Literary Studies · doi:10.36892/ijlls.v6i2.1739 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Nguyen, M., Agarwal, R., Malik, A., & Pandey, R. (2025) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-08-2024-0433 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Salman, M. S., & Chaya., R. (2024) · International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews · doi:10.55248/gengpi.5.0724.1750 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Qian, P., & Xie, X.-Z. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2526580 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Tbaishat, D., Amoudi, G., & Elfadel, M. (2025) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100421 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Cao, L., & Abdullah, A. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1643653 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Designing effective AI professional development: A framework grounded in intelligent-TPACK
Doğan, S. (2026) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2026.100337 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
AI Tutors vs. Human Instructors: Perceptions of Higher Education Students in Hungary and Spain
Hajeer, A., Papp-Váry, Á., & Pólya, É. (2024) · Edutec Revista Electrónica de Tecnología Educativa · doi:10.21556/edutec.2024.89.3523 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Mukhamedkarimova, D. F., & Umurkulova, M. M. (2025) · European Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.12973/eu-jer.14.4.1373 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Nemani, S. (2025) · Current Perspectives in Educational Research · doi:10.46303/cuper.2025.1 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Jacobs-Basadien, M., & Pather, S. (2026) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-026-01340-9 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Leahy, K., Özer, E., & Cummins, E. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15070807 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Generative AI in Engineering Education: A Survey of Student and Instructor Usage and Attitudes
Luo, Y. G., Chen, E., Liu, H., Riener, K. W., & Yang, S.-H. (2025) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/10711813251358792 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Sanchez, J. M. P., Sumalinog, G. G., Mananay, J. A., Goles, C. E., Alejandro, I. M. V., & Fernandez, C. B. (2025) · STEM Education · doi:10.3934/steme.2025045 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Examining Student Teachers’ Agency in an AI-Supported Learning Environment: Q Methodology Research
Chaaban, Y., Jung, S.-G., Medina, J., Azem, J. Y., Salminen, J. O., & Jansen, B. J. J. (2025) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-025-00529-y · Cited by 10 · see citing works
The added value of Learning Analytics in Higher Education
Gourna, S., Rigou, A., Kyriazi, F., & Marinagi, C. C. (2024) · International Journal of Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.46300/9109.2024.18.13 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Reddy, C. S., & Leelavathi, R. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Management · doi:10.1108/ijem-12-2024-0843 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Unboxing the black box: How Principal's regulatory focus shapes teacher innovative pedagogies
Liu, Y., & Xin, Z. (2024) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2024.104692 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Editorial: Framing the Future with a Research Agenda for Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education
Fitzgerald, R., Amantha Kumar, J., Roe, J., Roehrer, E., & Yang, J. (2025) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/jwt7ra63 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Apoko, T. W. (2025) · Journal of Languages and Language Teaching · doi:10.33394/jollt.v13i3.14190 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Guang-hui, H. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70261 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Transformer-based deep learning for adaptive pedagogy under uncertain student preferences
Wang, H. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-25996-0 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Tariq, M. U. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-4576-5.ch002 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Qiang, S., & Yuan, Q. (2024) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12685 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Learning Engagement with AI Tools and Academic Performance
Villaver, R. G., Cabigas, M. E. A., & DepEd Region 10, C. D. O. C. (2025) · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS · doi:10.47191/ijmra/v8-i07-55 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Kalogiannakis, M., Papakonstantinou, N., & Sotiropoulos, D. J. (2025) · Creative Education · doi:10.4236/ce.2025.169083 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Sridharan, B., Amrollahi, A., McKay, J., & de Castro, V. B. (2025) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2025.2536588 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Yapay Zekâ Kullanım Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi
Çatman, F. N., Topsakal, E., & Saatçioğlu, Ö. (2025) · Necmettin Erbakan Universitesi Eregli Egitim Fakultesi Necmettin Erbakan University · doi:10.51119/ereegf.2025.148 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Šerić, M., & Praničević, D. G. (2026) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13889-8 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Kaplan, K., Özen, N. E., & Özcan, H. Z. (2026) · Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology · doi:10.33902/jpsp.202641122 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Essien, A. E., Crawford, J., & Kremantzis, M. D. (2025) · Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching · doi:10.37074/jalt.2025.8.2.5 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationAn, Q. (2025) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102178 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Al-Shamaileh, O., Hammady, R., Abdelrahman, M., & Mubin, O. (2026) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2026.100980 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Enhancing Journalism and Communication Education Through Virtual Simulation Technology
Chen, Z., & Chen, Q. (2025) · International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies · doi:10.4018/ijwltt.381308 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
AI Tools and Technologies for Management Education
Tariq, M. U. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-2150-9.ch005 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Capuñay, J. E. C., Rosales, L. L. R., Velazco, S. V., Rosales, C. X. R., & Méndez, E. V. (2025) · doi:10.48209/978-65-5417-527-2 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and Student Engagement in Online Learning : A Literature Review
Zhou, Z. (2025) · American Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.1080/08923647.2025.2594282 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Dan, Z., Yali, Z., & Tong, Z. (2026) · Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s44443-026-00639-0 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Liu, F. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1795301 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
ChatGPT for educational-academic activities: Preschool student teachers’ experiences
Νικολοπούλου, Κ. (2025) · Intelligent Technologies in Education · doi:10.53761/ited/1.6 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Teacher Competence in the Use of ChatGPT for Developing Learning Media in Vocational High Schools
Aji, P. T., Nasuha, A., Irmawati, D., Sofyan, M. A. H., & Musaddid, A. T. (2024) · International Journal of Community Service Learning · doi:10.23887/ijcsl.v8i4.85397 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Integrating AI in Cybersecurity Higher Education: A Path to Workforce Readiness
Roshanaei, M., & Jachura, M. G. (2025) · Journal of Intelligent Learning Systems and Applications · doi:10.4236/jilsa.2025.172005 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Ge, Z.-G. (2026) · Innovations in Education and Teaching International · doi:10.1080/14703297.2026.2620543 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Rasi, S. (2026) · World Vocational and Technical Education · doi:10.1515/wvte-2026-0003 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Barriers and solutions in using artificial intelligence to transform journalism education in Vietnam
Linh, N. N., & Thắng, P. C. (2026) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/14648849261467553 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Ping, X., & Zhi, Y. (2026) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70769 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
AI Literacy in Learning and Educational Technology
Nguyen, A., Shalpegin, T., Lämsä, J., & Whitehead, R. (2024) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83608-852-320241007 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Role of a Digitised Learning System on Delivering Quality Education for Sustainable Development
Ramakgolo, M. A., & Niyitunga, E. B. (2025) · International Journal of Public Administration in the Digital Age · doi:10.4018/ijpada.368245 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Tan, S., Leslie, T. E. Y., & FOAD, M. F. M. M. (2024) · International Conference on Smart Computing and Communications (ICSCC) · doi:10.1109/icscc62041.2024.10690412 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Leveraging AI-Managed Learning Analytics and Micro-Credentials for Enhanced Student Engagement
Öncü, S., Çolakoğlu, M., & Çiğdem, H. (2024) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-5488-9.ch007 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Chang, C. (2025) · International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies · doi:10.4018/ijwltt.373315 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
The Impact on using Chat-Generative Pre-Trained Transformer on students
Malang, B. P. (2025) · International Journal on Culture History and Religion · doi:10.63931/ijchr.v7i1.85 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Sa’adah, N., Mulyati, D., Maghfirah, G., & Sara, T. (2025) · Jurnal Rekayasa Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi · doi:10.70248/jrsit.v3i1.2899 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
An, G. K., & Ngo, T. T. A. (2025) · Journal of Information Technology Education Research · doi:10.28945/5668 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Kong, S. C., & Zhu, J. (2026) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100555 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Maanu, V., Boateng, F. O., & Larbi, E. (2026) · International Journal of Didactical Studies · doi:10.33902/ijods.202635874 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Physicians’ attitudes toward artificial intelligence and ChatGPT: a cross-sectional study
Tosun, N., Tosun, M., & Güner, A. (2026) · Journal of Health Organization and Management · doi:10.1108/jhom-12-2025-0889 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Evaluating the impact of AI chatbots on student support and engagement in UK higher education
Kremantzis, M. D., Chondrogianni, A., & Essien, A. E. (2026) · Journal of Further and Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0309877x.2026.2693084 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationAboderin, O. S., & Pietersen, D. (2026) · Journal of Education · doi:10.17159/2520-9868/i105a03 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Sensors, Techniques, and Future Trends of Human-Engagement-Enabled Applications: A Review
Dai, Z., Zakka, V. G., Manso, L. J., Rudorfer, M., Bernardet, U., Zumer, J. M., & Kavakli, M. (2024) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a17120560 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
The Synergistic Power of AIoT in Enhancing EFL Student CCT Skills in Higher Education
Muthmainnah, M., Muliati, M., Kaur, D., Misdi, M., Yakin, A. M. A., Apriani, E., & Kumar, V. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-1399-3.ch012 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Integrating AI in Language Teaching: Challenges and Opportunities for Novice Efl Teachers
Resyadi, H. (2025) · Edukasi Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran · doi:10.19109/z7qmss50 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Patil, H., Assumption, M., & Latha, G. B. H. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0740-4.ch001 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Use of artificial intelligence in oral radiology: a multicenter cross-sectional study in Egypt
Saif, N., Elkoumi, A., & Shaalan, A. (2025) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-025-07269-4 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Παπακωνσταντίνου, Ν., Σωτηρόπουλος, Δ. Ι., & Kalogiannakis, M. (2025) · 13o Πανελλήνιο Συνέδριο της Διδακτικής των Φυσικών Επιστημών και Νέων Τεχνολογιών στην Εκπαίδευση · doi:10.12681/codiste.7742 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Generative Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Learning Development
Meletiadou, E. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-5623-4.ch002 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Enhancing Undergraduate Learning Outcomes: The Role of AI Tools in Modern Education
Musa, M. K., & Hashim, M. Z. (2025) · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences · doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v15-i5/25304 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Students' Learning Math With the Aid of AI and the Need of Shifting Classroom Instructions
Jackaria, P. M., Sali, A.-A. G., Alvarado, H. A. L., Jiripa, R. H. M., & Sahijuan, A.-S. Y. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0847-0.ch002 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Integrating AI to Address Generational Characteristics and Educational Needs
Andreeva, A. A., & Tuchkevich, E. (2025) · Journal of Teaching and Learning · doi:10.22329/jtl.v19i2.8932 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Generative AI Use at the iSchools : An Analysis of Policies
Poole, A. H., Ahmed, A., & Mentis, H. M. (2025) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.1339 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nguyen, A., Kremantzis, M., Essien, A., Petrounias, I., & Hosseini, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Oulu (FI)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Athens University of Economics and Business (GR)
- Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
- Venue
- Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
- Publisher
- Open Access Publishing Association
- Published
- 2024-04-19
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 06
- ISSN
- 1449-9789 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4394949418
- Semantic Scholar
- 6f83affb4051438cf2b321cf8c15a2197a008199
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 58 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- Funders
- Oulun Yliopisto (352788)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in higher education, student engagement, chatbots, artificial intelligence in education, AI implementation challenges
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review