Cited by 198Artificial Intelligence in EducationAI in Service InteractionsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Editorial: Enhancing Student Engagement Through Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the Basics, Opportunities, and Challenges

Open access
Nguyen, Andy, Kremantzis, Mario, Essien, Aniekan, Petrounias, Ilias, Hosseini, Samira·2024·Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice

Abstract

The proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and chatbots has the potential to significantly reshape higher education. It is now imperative for stakeholders in this sector to grasp the fundamental aspects of AI technologies and understand their implications. This paper not only introduces basic AI concepts but also explains their specific applications and relevance in the higher education context. Moreover, it outlines the prospects of using AI technologies and chatbots to boost student engagement, presenting a synthesis of the opportunities available. Concurrently, we discuss the concerns and challenges associated with integrating AI into higher education settings. Several articles included in this special issue explore these opportunities and challenges from diverse viewpoints and within various contexts, across countries such as Australia, the United Kingdom, Vietnam, Cyprus, and GCC nations. Finally, we propose several avenues for future research aimed at enhancing student engagement through AI, charting a path forward for empirical evidence and practical application of AI and chatbots in enhancing student engagement.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This editorial introduces a JUTLP special issue on enhancing student engagement through AI and chatbots, explaining basic AI/ML/deep learning and generative AI concepts in higher education. It synthesizes opportunities (intelligent tutoring, personalised learning, accessibility) and challenges (data privacy, algorithmic bias, academic integrity) and proposes future research directions.

Key findings

As an editorial, it synthesizes rather than reports primary results:

  • AI, ML, and DL are nested concepts; ML applied to early engagement data can identify students at risk of failing "as early as the fourth week of the Fall semester" (citing Gray & Perkins, 2019).
  • GenAI/LLMs can serve as teaching assistants, generate personalised content and feedback, and support accessibility (e.g., auto-generated captions, real-time translation), but full personalisation requires deeper integration of educational theory.
  • Key concerns: data privacy, algorithmic bias disadvantaging students by race, gender, or socioeconomic status, and threats to academic integrity and critical thinking from over-reliance on AI-generated content.
  • The special issue comprises "a commentary and seven articles" spanning Australia, the United Kingdom, Vietnam, Cyprus, and GCC nations.

Methods

Not stated in the paper (editorial synthesis; no empirical design, sample, or analysis reported). It reviews prior literature and summarises the special issue's contributions.

Limitations

Not stated in the paper. Evident from the text: it is a conceptual editorial without primary data, and its claims about AI's benefits and risks are drawn from cited secondary sources rather than new evidence; the proposed research directions (adaptive systems, ethical AI, collaborative learning, longitudinal studies) remain unaddressed by the paper itself.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.53761/caraaq92

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 53 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation

    Successful implementation of AI in higher education requires overcoming significant obstacles.

    “While these technologies offer great promise, educators and institutions will need to overcome significant obstacles for successful implementation (Crawford, Cowling, & Allen, 2023;Perkins, 2023).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Crawford, Cowling, & Allen, 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Perkins, 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    AI technologies and chatbots have the potential to significantly reshape higher education.

    “The proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies and chatbots has the potential to significantly reshape higher education.”
    • Also stated in: § Introduction · boosted
      “Despite these hurdles, the disruptive potential of emerging technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI) is undeniable (Crawford, Cowling, & Allen, 2023;Kelly et al., 2023;Lodge et al., 2023), offering new horizons for learning and teaching practices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Crawford, Cowling, & Allen, 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kelly et al., 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Lodge et al., 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Deep learning application in education is promising for analysing learners' cognitive and emotional processes.

    “The application of deep learning in education is particularly promising for analysing learners' cognitive and emotional processes, with studies by Nguyen et al. (2022) and Tzirakis et al. (2017) highlighting its potential.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Nguyen et al. (2022)

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Tzirakis et al. (2017)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Machine learning algorithms can dynamically adjust the learning environment in real-time, providing each student with a customised learning trajectory that optimally supports their progress and engagement.

    “Moreover, machine learning algorithms can dynamically adjust the learning environment in real-time, providing each student with a customised learning trajectory that optimally supports their progress and engagement (Ninaus et al., 2019;Raj & Renumol, 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Ninaus et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Raj & Renumol, 2022

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation

    Applying machine learning techniques to early learning engagement data can identify students at risk of failing as early as the fourth week of the Fall semester.

    “For instance, Gray and Perkins (2019) demonstrated that by applying machine learning techniques to early learning engagement data, it is feasible to identify students at risk of failing as early as the fourth week of the Fall semester.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gray and Perkins (2019)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 33
  • May combine two claims. 27
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The integration of digital technology into higher education has been met with both enthusiasm and skepticism, characterised by challenges such as user resistance, lack of necessary skills, policy complications, and ethical and privacy concerns.

    “The invasion of digital technology into higher education, spanning several decades, has been met with both enthusiasm and skepticism, characterised by challenges such as user resistance, lack of necessary skills, policy complications, and ethical and privacy concerns (Essien et al., 2024;Nguyen, Gardner, et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Essien et al., 2024

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Nguyen, Gardner, et al., 2020

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Strategies that bridge skill gaps, consider ethical implications, and ensure alignment with existing policies are required for AI integration in higher education.

    “This requires strategies that bridge skill gaps, carefully consider ethical implications, and ensure alignment with existing policies (Nguyen et al., 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nguyen et al., 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    AI systems such as intelligent tutoring systems, adaptive learning systems, or personalised learning platforms can customize instruction, provide timely feedback, and aid in developing adaptive learning resources tailored to individual student needs.

    “They might include intelligent tutoring systems (ITS), adaptive learning systems, or personalised learning platforms, which can customize instruction, provide timely feedback to learners, and aid in developing adaptive learning resources tailored to individual student needs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Generative AI can be used to create personalised learning resources, model real-life situations for hands-on learning, and develop detailed simulations or models for scientific investigation.

    “In educational environments, this type of AI can be used to create personalised learning resources, model real-life situations for hands-on learning, and develop detailed simulations or models for scientific investigation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Generative AI can formulate mathematical or physics practice questions, construct historical recreations, or develop language exercises that adjust to a student's level of proficiency.

    “For instance, generative AI can formulate mathematical or physics practice questions, construct historical recreations, or develop language exercises that adjust to a student's level of proficiency.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Multimodal deep learning approaches have been explored for predicting intricate learning activities, such as shared regulation during collaborative learning.

    “For example, multimodal deep learning approaches have been explored for predicting intricate learning activities, such as those involved in shared regulation during collaborative learning scenarios.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nguyen et al. (2022)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    AI, machine learning, and deep learning advancements offer potential to deeply understand and enhance the learning process based on individual learner data and interactions.

    “These technological advancements in AI, machine learning, and deep learning open new horizons for personalised and adaptive learning experiences in education, offering the potential to deeply understand and enhance the learning process based on individual learner data and interactions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Generative AI and M-LLMs have profound implications for learning and teaching.

    “Generative AI (GenAI) and (Multimodal-)Large Language Models (M-LLMs) represent significant advancements in the field of artificial intelligence, offering profound implications for learning and teaching.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationnone given

    Recent advancements in AI, particularly generative AI, have a transformative impact on higher education.

    “The recent advancements in AI, particularly with generative AI, emphasise the transformative impact on higher education, raising critical questions about the future of learning and teaching with AI technologies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Generative AI and M-LLMs have the potential to revolutionise educational practices by providing innovative tools for content creation, personalised learning, and interactive engagement.

    “These technologies have the potential to revolutionise educational practices by providing innovative tools for content creation, personalised learning, and interactive engagement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    AI has potential in facilitating adaptive learning systems, personalisation, and intelligent tutoring systems, catering to diverse learning needs and styles.

    “Furthermore, the comprehensive review by Zawacki-Richter et al. (2019) emphasised AI's potential in facilitating adaptive learning systems, personalisation, and intelligent tutoring systems, underscoring the technology's capability to cater to diverse learning needs and styles.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zawacki-Richter et al. (2019)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    LLMs can comprehend and produce text in ways that are contextually relevant and syntactically coherent, making them particularly useful for a variety of educational applications.

    “These models can comprehend and produce text in ways that are contextually relevant and syntactically coherent, making them particularly useful for a variety of educational applications.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Deployment of AI in educational contexts introduces ethical concerns, including data privacy, bias in AI algorithms, and implications of AI-mediated interactions on student learning experience.

    “However, the deployment of AI in educational contexts also introduces ethical concerns, including data privacy, bias in AI algorithms, and the implications of AI-mediated interactions on the student learning experience (Essien et al., 2024).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Essien et al., 2024

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    AI has the capacity to unveil critical indicators previously overlooked by stakeholders at various levels of the educational hierarchy, suggesting a transformative role in shaping strategic decisions and educational outcomes.

    “Nguyen et al. (2020) highlighted the capacity of AI to unveil critical indicators previously overlooked by stakeholders at various levels of the educational hierarchy, suggesting a transformative role for AI in shaping strategic decisions and educational outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nguyen et al. (2020)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    AI advancements demonstrate potential for revolutionary change in education, creating learner-centred environments that could significantly boost student engagement.

    “These advancements demonstrate the potential for a revolutionary change in education, creating learner-centred environments that could significantly boost student engagement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    LLMs can support personalised learning by offering tutoring or feedback on written assignments, generating practice essay prompts, and facilitating language learning through conversation simulations.

    “LLMs can support personalised learning by offering tutoring or feedback on written assignments, generating practice essay prompts, and facilitating language learning through conversation simulations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Machine learning can be harnessed for learning analytics to analyse student data, offering personalised instruction recommendations, identifying trends in student behaviour, and forecasting academic performance.

    “Within the context of education, machine learning can be harnessed for learning analytics to analyse vast amounts of student data, offering personalised instruction recommendations, identifying trends in student behaviour, and forecasting academic performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Generative AI allows educators to offer varied, engaging, and customised learning experiences.

    “This technology allows educators to offer varied, engaging, and customised learning experiences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Incorporation of AI technology in higher education to enhance student engagement offers immersive opportunities but also presents several challenges that need to be addressed.

    “The incorporation of AI technology in higher education to enhance student engagement offers immersive opportunities but also presents several challenges that need to be addressed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    MLLMs have the potential to transform educational content delivery by making it more interactive and engaging.

    “MLLMs have the potential to transform educational content delivery by making it more interactive and engaging.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    An MLLM can analyse a scientific text and generate corresponding visual aids, such as diagrams or animations, to help students better understand complex concepts.

    “For example, an MLLM can analyse a scientific text and generate corresponding visual aids, such as diagrams or animations, to help students better understand complex concepts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    MLLMs increase the accuracy of educational research and enhance the quality of the learning experiences provided.

    “This method not only increases the accuracy of educational research but also enhances the quality of the learning experiences provided.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    LLMs can assist in the creation of instructional content, summarise academic texts, and help in drafting research papers or educational resources, thereby reducing the workload on educators and enabling more focused and effective teaching strategies.

    “Additionally, LLMs can assist in the creation of instructional content, summarise academic texts, and even help in drafting research papers or educational resources, thereby reducing the workload on educators and enabling more focused and effective teaching strategies (Dwivedi et al., 2023;Nguyen et al., 2024).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dwivedi et al., 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Nguyen et al., 2024

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    ITS can assess student submissions, identify errors, and provide targeted feedback to help students improve.

    “These systems can assess student submissions, identify errors, and provide targeted feedback to help students improve (Mousavinasab et al., 2021;Tchounikine et al., 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Mousavinasab et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Tchounikine et al., 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Multimodal approach caters to visual learners and can aid in the retention of information by providing multiple reference points for understanding material.

    “This multimodal approach caters to visual learners and can aid in the retention of information by providing multiple reference points for understanding material.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    ITS can enhance student engagement and lead to learning outcomes by offering support tailored to the student's current level of understanding.

    “By offering support that is tailored to the student's current level of understanding, ITS can enhance student engagement and lead to learning outcomes (VanLehn, 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites VanLehn, 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A recent study by Nguyen et al. (2024) demonstrated patterns of collaboration between humans and AI in AI-assisted academic writing.

    “A recent study by Nguyen et al. (2024) has demonstrated the patterns of collaboration between humans and AI in AI-assisted academic writing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Nguyen et al. (2024)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    By generating personalised content, assessments, and feedback dynamically, GenAI supports a variety of learning styles and schedules, thereby increasing engagement and making education more responsive to the diverse needs and lifestyles of students.

    “By generating personalised content, assessments, and feedback dynamically, GenAI supports a variety of learning styles and schedules, thereby increasing engagement and making education more responsive to the diverse needs and lifestyles of students.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Integration of AI, particularly Generative AI, into education brings substantial benefits but also raises significant ethical issues and challenges to academic integrity.

    “The integration of AI, particularly Generative AI, into education brings substantial benefits but also raises significant ethical issues and challenges to academic integrity that need to be thoughtfully examined and managed (Crawford, Cowling, & Allen, 2023;Holmes et al., 2021;Nguyen et al., 2023).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Crawford, Cowling, & Allen, 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Holmes et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Nguyen et al., 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Recent availability of GenAI technologies has further propelled the personalised learning experience by facilitating real-time interactions with each learner.

    “The recent availability of GenAI technologies has further propelled the personalised learning experience by facilitating real-time interactions with each learner.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    MOOC resources are often static and do not truly cater to the unique needs of each learner.

    “However, these resources are often static and do not truly cater to the unique needs of each learner.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Personalised learning is an effective method that customises educational experiences to meet the specific needs of individual learners.

    “While personalised learning has been acknowledged as an effective method that customises educational experiences to meet the specific needs of individual learners (Xie et al., 2019;Zheng et al., 2021), the significant resources needed to put this model into practice make it challenging to adopt on a large scale (Nguyen, Gardner, et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Xie et al., 2019

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Zheng et al., 2021

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Numerous studies have explored the development of personalised learning, resulting in various prototypes that aim to enhance its feasibility and effectiveness.

    “Numerous studies have explored the development of personalised learning, resulting in various prototypes that aim to enhance its feasibility and effectiveness (Denny et al., 2015;Hsieh et al., 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Denny et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hsieh et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    GenAI can assist in evaluating students' work by examining written assignments, presentations, and spoken responses, providing comprehensive feedback that covers both textual and auditory elements.

    “Moreover, GenAI can assist in evaluating students' work by examining written assignments, presentations, and spoken responses, providing comprehensive feedback that covers both the textual and auditory elements of the content.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    GenAI accessibility allows for broader integration into various educational settings, supporting a more dynamic and responsive learning environment.

    “This accessibility allows for broader integration into various educational settings, supporting a more dynamic and responsive learning environment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    AI-powered tools can automatically generate captions for lecture videos or provide realtime language translation, removing barriers to access and engagement for a broader spectrum of students.

    “For instance, AI-powered tools can automatically generate captions for lecture videos or provide realtime language translation, removing barriers to access and engagement for a broader spectrum of students.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Generative AI is transforming the educational field, making it more interactive and adaptable to the needs of today's learners.

    “Thus, generative AI is transforming the educational field, making it more interactive and adaptable to the needs of today's learners.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    GenAI can serve as dynamic teaching assistants, offering educators a range of tools to enhance their teaching methods.

    “GenAI can serve as dynamic teaching assistants, offering educators a range of tools to enhance their teaching methods.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    GenAI capability to provide instantaneous feedback and tailor learning materials according to individual student needs represents a transformative step towards true personalised learning.

    “This capability of GenAI to provide instantaneous feedback and tailor learning materials according to individual student needs represents a transformative step towards true personalised learning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    GenAI enhances educational accessibility and convenience, allowing students to interact with learning materials anytime and anywhere.

    “Moreover, GenAI enhances educational accessibility and convenience, allowing students to interact with learning materials anytime and anywhere.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Round-the-clock availability of tailored educational resources through GenAI makes learning more accessible and substantially enriches the overall learning experience.

    “This round-the-clock availability of tailored educational resources through GenAI not only makes learning more accessible but also substantially enriches the overall learning experience.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Teachers can use GenAI to create diverse educational materials that incorporate text, visuals, and audio, making lessons more dynamic and engaging.

    “Teachers can use GenAI to create diverse educational materials that incorporate text, visuals, and audio, making lessons more dynamic and engaging.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    This flexibility is particularly beneficial for learners who need to balance educational pursuits with other commitments or those who prefer studying outside conventional classroom settings.

    “This flexibility is particularly beneficial for learners who need to balance educational pursuits with other commitments or those who prefer studying outside conventional classroom settings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Institutional leadership plays a crucial role in ensuring the ethical deployment and management of ChatGPT by establishing standards and practices that prioritize transparency, accountability, and the protection of user data.

    “Institutional leadership plays a crucial role in ensuring the ethical deployment and management of ChatGPT by establishing standards and practices that prioritize transparency, accountability, and the protection of user data (Crawford, Cowling, & Allen, 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Crawford, Cowling, & Allen, 2023

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Reliance on AI tools raises concerns about students' development of critical thinking and problem-solving skills, as the ease of access to information might deter deeper engagement with learning materials.

    “This reliance on AI tools also raises concerns about students' development of critical thinking and problem-solving skills, as the ease of access to information might deter deeper engagement with learning materials.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    One of the foremost ethical concerns involves data privacy.

    “One of the foremost ethical concerns involves data privacy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    As students increasingly rely on AI-generated content, there is a risk that it could facilitate academic dishonesty, making it difficult to ascertain whether work submitted is truly indicative of a student's own understanding and effort.

    “As students increasingly rely on AI-generated content, there is a risk that it could facilitate academic dishonesty, making it difficult to ascertain whether work submitted is truly indicative of a student's own understanding and effort.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
47 of 47

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many educators appreciate GenAI's potential for enhancing efficiency and streamlining processes.

    “The literature highlights that many educators appreciate GenAI’s potential for enhancing efficiency and streamlining processes [55].”

    From Generative AI in Higher Education: Balancing Innovation and Integrity (2025) · cites this paper as [55]

    The “Interactive Teaching Aids” section says GenAI can help educators create materials and evaluate students’ work, and the “Generative AI and (Multimodal-) Large Language Models” section describes greater efficiency in academic writing. These passages support potential efficiency benefits, but they do not establish that many educators appreciate those benefits or view GenAI as streamlining their processes. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The reliability and accuracy of AI models raise ethical and epistemological concerns that impact the development of critical skills, as students may internalize information without a rigorous assessment process.

    “the reliability and accuracy of AI models raise ethical and epistemological concerns that impact the development of critical skills, as students may internalize information without a rigorous assessment process”

    From Determining Factors for the Development of Critical Thinking in Higher Education (2025) · cites this paper as Nguyen et al. 2024

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Nguyen, A., Järvelä, S., Wang, Y., & Róse, C. (2022). Exploring Socially Shared Regulation with an AI Deep Learning Approach Using Multimodal Data. Proceedings of International Conferences of Learning Sciences (ICLS). https://2022.isls.org/proceedings/
  2. Whitehead, R., Nguyen, A., & Järvelä, S. (2024). The Generative Multimodal Analysis (GMA) Methodology for Studying Socially Shared Regulation in Collaborative Learning. The International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK24). https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ridwan- Whitehead/publication/378964778_The_Generative_Multimodal_Analysis_GMA_Method ology_for_Studying_Socially_Shared_Regulation_in_Collaborative_Learning/links/65f34f 211f0aec67e28fd7d9/The-Generative-Multimodal-Analysis-GMA-Methodology-for- Studying-Socially-Shared-Regulation-in-Collaborative-Learning.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nguyen, A., Kremantzis, M., Essien, A., Petrounias, I., & Hosseini, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Oulu (FI)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Athens University of Economics and Business (GR)
  • Tecnológico de Monterrey (MX)
Venue
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
Published
2024-04-19
Volume
21
Issue
06
ISSN
1449-9789 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4394949418
Cited by
146
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
Funders
Oulun Yliopisto (352788)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in Service Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
artificial intelligence in higher education, student engagement, chatbots, artificial intelligence in education, AI implementation challenges

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review