Cited by 29Sport Psychology and PerformancePerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Yips and Lost Move Syndrome: Assessing impact and exploring levels of perfectionism, rumination, and reinvestment

Bennett, Jenn, Rotheram, Michael, Hays, Kate, Olusoga, Peter, Maynard, Ian W., Lindsay, Pete·2016·Sport & Exercise Psychology Review

Abstract

This study examined whether the yips and lost move syndrome (LMS) are associated with higher levels of perfectionism, rumination, and reinvestment, and whether individuals experiencing these problems perceive them as highly stressful. Samples of yips (N=15) and LMS-affected (N=15) individuals, and two matched control groups, completed the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (FMPS; Frost, Marten, Lahart & Rosenblate, 1990), the Ruminative Response Scale (RRS; Nolen-Hoeksema, 1991), the Reinvestment Scale (RS; Masters, Polman & Hammond, 1993), and the Impact of Event Scale (IES; Horowitz, Wilner & Alverez, 1979). Findings indicate higher scores in the yips and LMS groups for perfectionism, rumination, reinvestment, and IES compared to their respective control groups. The results suggest that rumination, reinvestment, and aspects of perfectionism increase vulnerability to the yips and LMS, and that both the yips and LMS are equally distressing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.53841/bpssepr.2016.12.1.14

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Yips-affected athletes experience negative cognitive phenomena alongside engagement, performance, and self-consciousness, including ruminations and concern about mistakes.

    “Yips-affected athletes also experience negative cognitive phenomena alongside engagement, performance, and self-consciousness (Wang et al., 2004), which include ruminations and concern about mistakes (Bennett et al., 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bennett, J., Rotheram, M., Hays, K., Olusoga, P., Maynard, I. W., & Lindsay, P.
Affiliations
English Institute of Sport (GB)
Venue
Sport & Exercise Psychology Review
Published
2016-03
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
14-27
ISSN
  • 1745-4980 (ISSN-L)
  • 2396-961X
OpenAlex
W2254114594
Cited by
29
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
7.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sport & Exercise Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
yips, perfectionism, rumination, reinvestment, psychological stress, psychological distress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review