Cited by 480Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Social Anxiety and Social Anxiety Disorder

Morrison, Amanda S., Heimberg, Richard G.·2013·Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Research on social anxiety and social anxiety disorder has proliferated over the years since the explication of the disorder through cognitive-behavioral models. This review highlights a recently updated model from our group and details recent research stemming from the (a) information processing perspective, including attention bias, interpretation bias, implicit associations, imagery and visual memories, and (b) emotion regulation perspective, including positive emotionality and anger. In addition, we review recent studies exploring the roles of self-focused attention, safety behaviors, and post-event processing in the maintenance of social anxiety. Within each area, we detail the ways in which these topics have implications for the treatment of social anxiety and for future research. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of how several of the areas reviewed contribute to our model of social anxiety disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185631

Cites

127 of 127 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social anxiety symptoms are particularly contextually bound.

    “SA symptoms are particularly contextually bound, and thus, it is of utmost relevance to consider the sensitivity of the context [2].”
  • Social anxiety disorder is a heterogeneous clinical condition that usually entails high levels of dysfunction and is marked by dynamic deployment of cognitions, emotions, and behaviors in interaction with others and in different contexts.

    “SAD is a heterogeneous clinical condition that usually entails high levels of dysfunction in the lives of people who experience it. This heterogeneous nature of SAD is marked by the dynamic deployment of cognitions, emotions, and behaviors in the interaction with others and in different contexts [2].”
  • Most cited models of the emergence of social anxiety and the etiology of SAD are 'cognitive' and present social anxiety as a product of a specific type of attention, stimuli interpretation, or both.

    “The most cited models of emergence of social anxiety experience and etiology of SAD are connoted as ‘cognitive’ and present social anxiety as a product of a specific type of attention, stimuli interpretation, or both [9,10,11].”

    From Shame or What Makes Irrational Social Anxiety Rational. (2025) · cites this paper as [11]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morrison, A. S., & Heimberg, R. G.
Affiliations
Temple University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
Published
2013-03-28
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
249-274
ISSN
  • 1548-5943 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-5951
OpenAlex
W2147509803
Cited by
480
References
127
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 3
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
social anxiety, social anxiety disorder, cognitive-behavioral model, attentional bias, interpretation bias, implicit associations, imagery, visual memory, positive affectivity, anger, self-focus, safety behavior, post-event processing, social anxiety treatment
MeSH terms
Attention, Emotions, Humans, Models, Psychological, Phobic Disorders, Self Concept

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review