Cited by 480Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMind wandering and attentionPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The effects of worry and rumination on affect states and cognitive activity.

McLaughlin, Katie A., Borkovec, Thomas D., Sibrava, Nicholas J.·2007·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

The effects of worry and rumination on affective states and mentation type were examined in an unselected undergraduate sample in Study 1 and in a sample of individuals with high trait worry and rumination, high rumination, and low worry/rumination in Study 2. Participants engaged in worry and rumination inductions, counterbalanced in order across participants to assess main and interactive effects of these types of negative thinking. During mentation periods, the thought vs. imaginal nature and the temporal orientation of mentations were assessed 5 times. Following mentation periods, negative and positive affect, relaxation, anxiety, and depression were assessed. Both worry and rumination produced increases in negative affect and decreases in positive affect. Worry tended to generate greater anxiety, and rumination tended to generate greater depression. Interactive effects were also found indicating that worry may lessen the anxiety experienced during subsequent rumination. Moreover, worry lessened the depressing effects of rumination. Worry was associated with significantly greater thought than imagery, compared to rumination. Rumination involved a progression from mentation about the past to mentation about the future over time. Implications for understanding the generation of negative affect and comorbid anxiety and depression are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2006.03.003

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McLaughlin, K. A., Borkovec, T. D., & Sibrava, N. J.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
McLaughlin, Katie A.
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
23-38
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046053304
Cited by
480
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 16
FWCI
11.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH076550, MH-58593, R01MH058593)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
worry, rumination, negative affect, positive affect, anxiety, depression, trait worry, rumination induction, comorbid depression and anxiety, affective states
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Anxiety, Attitude, Cognition, Depression, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Thinking, Time Perception, Comorbidity, Expressed Emotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review