Cited by 31Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyMeat and Animal Product Quality

The Effect of a Silage Inoculant on Silage Quality, Aerobic Stability, and Meat Production on Farm Scale.

Open access
Acosta Aragón, Y., Jatkauskas, J., Vrotniakiene, V.·2012·ISRN Veterinary Science

Abstract

The effect of inoculation on nutrient content, fermentation, aerobic stability, and beef cattle performance for whole-plant corn silage treated with a commercial product (blend of homo- and heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria, BSM, blend of Enterococcus faecium, Lactobacillus plantarum, and Lactobacillus brevis, DSM numbers 3530, 19457, and 23231, resp.), was compared to a control treatment with no silage additives (CT). The material had a DM of 323 g/kg, crude protein, and water-soluble carbohydrate concentrations of 87.9 and 110.5 g/kg DM, respectively. BSM increased the fermentation rate with a significantly deeper pH (P < 0.01), a significant increase in the total organic acids concentration (P < 0.05), more lactic acid (P < 0.01), and numerically more acetic acid compared to CT. BSM significantly decreased the concentrations of butyric acid (P < 0.01), ethanol, and ammonia-N compared to the CT. BSM-treated silage decreased DM by 3.0 % (P < 0.01) and had a higher digestible energy and a higher metabolizable energy concentration by 2.3 (P < 0.01) and 1.00 % (P < 0.05), respectively, compared to untreated silage. Aerobic stability improved by more than 2 days in BSM silage. The DM intake of silage treated with BSM increased by 6.14 %, and improved weight gain and the feed conversion by 8.0 (P < 0.01) and 3.4%.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5402/2012/345927

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [6]Weddell JR Agnew R Cottrill B The UK forage additives approval scheme—developments and products approvals In: Proceedings of the 13th International Silage Conference 2002 Auchincruive, UK 230 231
  2. [7]Muck RE Kung L Jr. Effects of silage additives on ensiling In: Proceedings of the Silage: Field to Feed Bunk North American Conference 1997 NRAES -99 187 199
  3. [8]Muck E Contreras FE Mertens DR Silage inoculant effects on in vitro rumen fermentation Journal of Animal Science 2007 85 p. 284
  4. [9]Filya I Karabulut A Sucu E The effect of Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus buchneri on the fermentation, aerobic stability and ruminal degradability of corn silage in warm climate In: Proceedings of the 13th International Silage Conference 2002
  5. [14]Merry RJ Jones R Theodorou MK Hopkins A The conservation of grass Grass. Its Production and Utilisation 2000 3rd edition Oxford, UK Blackwell Science
  6. [17]Jatkauskas J Vrotniakiene V Fermentation characteristics and nutritive value of inoculated corn silage In: Proceedings of the 20th general meeting of EGF 2004 Luzern, Switzerland 1077 1079
  7. [18]Pahlow G Honig H The role of microbial additives in the aerobic stability of silage In: Proceedings of the 15th General Meeting of EGF 1994 The Netherlands 149 152
  8. [23]Reis RA Almeida GR Siqueira GR Bernardes ER Janusckiewicz E Park RS Stronge MD Microbial changes and aerobic stability in high moisture corn silages inoculated with Lactobacillus buchneri In: Proceedings of the 14th International Silage Conference 2005 Belfast, UK 223 pages

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Acosta Aragón, Y., Jatkauskas, J., & Vrotniakiene, V.
Affiliations
  • Biomin Holding GmbH, Herzogenburg 3130, Austria
  • Department of Animal Nutrition and Feeds, Institute of Animal Science of Lithuanian Veterinary Academy, Baisogala 82317, Lithuania
Venue
ISRN Veterinary Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-04-09
Volume
2012
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 2090-4452 (ISSN-L)
  • 2090-4460
OpenAlex
W2095223873
Cited by
31
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ISRN Veterinary Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lithuanian University of Health Sciences (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
Keywords
silage inoculants, corn silage, aerobic stability, silage fermentation, lactic acid bacteria, Enterococcus faecium, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactobacillus brevis, beef cattle performance, silage additives, metabolizable energy, dry matter intake, weight gain, feed conversion, silage quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review