Cited by 92Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyProbiotics and Fermented FoodsAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Screening and selection of lactic acid bacteria strains suitable for ensiling grass.

Saarisalo, E., Skyttä, E., Haikara, A., Jalava, T., Jaakkola, S.·2007·Journal of Applied Microbiology

Abstract

AIM: Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains shown to have broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity were screened for potential as grass silage inoculants. The strains capable of rapidly lowering the pH of the grass matrix and with low proteolytic activity were assessed in laboratory-scale silos in a grass matrix containing natural microbial flora. METHODS AND RESULTS: Screening of nine candidate strains was performed first in a grass extract medium. The four most promising strains were selected on the basis of growth rate in the medium, capacity to reduce pH and ability to limit the formation of ammonia-N. The efficiency of the selected strains was further assessed in a laboratory-scale ensiling experiment. Untreated (no additive) and formic acid served as controls. All tested inoculants improved silage quality compared with untreated. With one exception (Pediococcus parvulus E315) the fermentation losses in the inoculated silages were even lower than in the acid-treated control silage. Pure lactic acid fermentation was obtained in the timothy-meadow fescue silage with all inoculants. The results obtained in the ensiling experiments were consistent with those of the screening procedure, which appeared to predict correctly the potential of LAB as silage inoculants. The strains with a low ammonia production rate in the grass extract medium behaved similarly in the silage. Especially in this respect the strain Lactobacillus plantarum E76 was superior to the other candidates. CONCLUSIONS: The screening method using grass extract proved to be useful in strain selection. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The rapid screening method developed for the LAB strains provides a useful tool for more systematic product development of commercial inoculant preparations. Time consuming and laborious ensiling experiments can be limited only to the most promising strains.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.03103.x

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saarisalo, E., Skyttä, E., Haikara, A., Jalava, T., & Jaakkola, S.
Affiliations
  • Agrifood Research Finland (FI)
  • VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
Corresponding author
Saarisalo, E.
Venue
Journal of Applied Microbiology
Published
2007-02
Volume
102
Issue
2
Pages
327-36
ISSN
  • 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2672
OpenAlex
W1978962053
Cited by
92
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
lactic acid bacteria, silage inoculants, grass silage, strain screening, strain selection, pH reduction, proteolytic activity, Lactobacillus plantarum, Pediococcus parvulus, formic acid
MeSH terms
Antibiosis, Campylobacter, Clostridium, Fermentation, Gases, Poaceae, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Lactobacillus, Plant Proteins, Silage, Species Specificity, Yeasts, Carbohydrate Metabolism, Microbial Viability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review