The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multinational Companies and the Natural Environment: Determinants of Global Environmental Policy
Abstract
This study analyzes the determinants of global standardization of multinational companies’ environmental policies. Survey data from the chemical industry show that MNCs standardize different environmental policy dimensions in response to pressures from different external stakeholders. MNC characteristics also affect environmental policy standardization. Findings demonstrate that the nature of stakeholder demands affects firms’ responses to stakeholder pressures. Because environmental policy standardization reduces MNCs’ ability to exploit cross-country differences in environmental regulations, these findings also have important implications for the self-regulation of MNCs’ environmental conduct.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725153 · Cited by 7,297
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020
Top executive commitment to the status quo: Some tests of its determinants
Hambrick, D. C., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Fredrickson, J. W. (1993) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250140602 · Cited by 1,058
Cited by
Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2006) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400227 · Cited by 861
Schnackenberg, A. K., & Tomlinson, E. C. (2016) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314525202 · Cited by 762
Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2006) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400231 · Cited by 745
Self-citationStakeholder Multiplicity: Toward an Understanding of the Interactions between Stakeholders
Neville, B. A., & Menguc, B. (2006) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-0015-4 · Cited by 379
Antecedents of CSR Practices in MNCs’ Subsidiaries: A Stakeholder and Institutional Perspective
Yang, X., & Rivers, C. (2009) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0191-0 · Cited by 371
Generating global brand equity through corporate social responsibility to key stakeholders
Torres, A., Bijmolt, T. H. A., Tribó, J. A., & Verhoef, P. (2012) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.10.002 · Cited by 323
Golini, R., & Gualandris, J. (2018) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-12-2016-0725 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Christmann, P.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2004-10-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 747-760
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2800800343
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 28.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
