The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reversal of Strategic Change
Open accessAbstract
When planned change is canceled, managers may be tempted to reverse their organization's strategy. Our longitudinal case study documents an organization's canceled merger effort and a failed attempt to return to the organization's widely accepted premerger strategy. We trace the failure to contradictions in symbolic change management. The phenomenon of change reversal draws attention to the historical continuity of “sensemaking” and raises caution about the popular view that managers need to destroy organizational meaning to facilitate the realization of strategic change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Piderit, S. K. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.3707722 · Cited by 1,873
Cognitive change, strategic action, and organizational renewal
Barr, P. S., Stimpert, J. L., & Huff, A. S. (1992) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250131004 · Cited by 1,290
The self and autobiographical memory: Correspondence and coherence
Conway, M. A., Singer, J. A., & Tagini, A. (2004) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.22.5.491.50768 · Cited by 897
Understanding and managing cynicism about organizational change
Reichers, A. E., Wanous, J. P., & Austin, J. T. (1997) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/ame.1997.9707100659 · Cited by 722
Remembrance of Things Past? The Dynamics of Organizational Forgetting
Holan, P. M. D., & Phillips, N. (2004) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1040.0273 · Cited by 556
Cited by
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428112452151 · Cited by 13,227
Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward
Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2014.873177 · Cited by 1,764
Sun, T. Q., & Medaglia, R. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008 · Cited by 948
Institutional Work to Maintain Professional Power: Recreating the Model of Medical Professionalism
Currie, G., Lockett, A., Finn, R., Martin, G., & Waring, J. (2012) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840612445116 · Cited by 448
Conceptualizing Historical Organization Studies
Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Clegg, S. R. (2016) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0133 · Cited by 410
Change management interventions: Taking stock and moving forward
Hagl, C., Kanitz, R., Gonzalez, K., & Hoegl, M. (2024) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2023.101000 · Cited by 47
Memory-based change management: Using the past to guide the future
Do, B., & Lyle, M. C. B. (2022) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/20413866221093512 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Mantere, S., Schildt, H. A., & Sillince, J. A. A.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 172-196
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2146319152
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 37.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
