The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Work-Unit Absenteeism: Effects of Satisfaction, Commitment, Labor Market Conditions, and Time
Abstract
Prior research is limited in explaining absenteeism at the unit level and over time. We developed and tested a model of unit-level absenteeism using five waves of data collected over six years from 115 work units in a large state agency. Unit-level job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and local unemployment were modeled as time-varying predictors of absenteeism. Shared satisfaction and commitment interacted in predicting absenteeism but were not related to the rate of change in absenteeism over time. Unit-level satisfaction and commitment were more strongly related to absenteeism when units were located in areas with plentiful job alternatives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-z · Cited by 11,049
Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review
Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206305279602 · Cited by 10,068
Perceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 10,023
Social Influence: Compliance and Conformity
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015 · Cited by 6,077
Personality, affect, and behavior in groups
George, J. M. (1990) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.107 · Cited by 1,372
Using SAS PROC MIXED to Fit Multilevel Models, Hierarchical Models, and Individual Growth Models
Singer, J. D. (1998) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.2307/1165280 · Cited by 1,092
Group Size, ICC Values, and Group-Level Correlations: A Simulation
Bliese, P. D. (1998) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/109442819814001 · Cited by 636 · cited 1×
“Although the ICC(2) values indicate greater reliability in group means, which is attributable to the larger average group size (see Bliese, 1998), ICC(1) results show that the district-level aggregation explains only a negligible amount of between-group variance.”
BackgroundEffects of Normative Feedback on Consumption among Heavy Drinking College Students
Agostinelli, G., Brown, J. M., & Miller, W. R. (1995) · Journal of Drug Education · doi:10.2190/xd56-d6wr-7195-eal3 · Cited by 323
Cited by
Dul, J. (2016) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428115584005 · Cited by 1,360
Judge, T. A., & Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2012) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100511 · Cited by 511
Hausknecht, J. P., & Trevor, C. O. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310383910 · Cited by 397
Self-citationBarsade, S. G., & O’Neill, O. A. (2014) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839214538636 · Cited by 379
Consiglio, C., Borgogni, L., Alessandri, G., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2013) · Work & Stress · doi:10.1080/02678373.2013.769325 · Cited by 135
Metadata
- Authors
- Hausknecht, J. P., Hiller, N. J., & Vance, R. J.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1223-1245
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2171169897
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 12.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Work-Unit Absenteeism: Effects of Satisfaction, Commitment, Labor Market Conditions, and Time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amj.2008.35733022
- The paper
- Hausknecht, J. P., Hiller, N. J., & Vance, R. J. (2008). Work-Unit Absenteeism: Effects of Satisfaction, Commitment, Labor Market Conditions, and Time. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.35733022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
