The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Risks and Rewards of Speaking Up: Managerial Responses to Employee Voice
Abstract
This article examines whether managerial responses to employees speaking up depend on the type of voice exhibited—that is, whether employees speak up in challenging or supportive ways. In one field study and two experimental studies, I found that managers view employees who engage in more challenging forms of voice as worse performers and endorse their ideas less than those who engage in supportive forms of voice. Further, perceptions of loyalty and threat mediated these relationships, but in different ways. I discuss implications for research on voice, proactivity, and social persuasion.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“prohibitive voice can lead to negative consequences for the speaker, including managerial retaliation, strained workplace relationships, or exclusion from important decision-making processes13–16.”
From Leader prohibitive voice shapes employee voice through psychological safety moderated by self-efficacy and generational differences (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“This limited attention is particularly problematic given that prohibitive voice entails greater psychological risk and ambiguity5,7,13.”
From Leader prohibitive voice shapes employee voice through psychological safety moderated by self-efficacy and generational differences (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.
Longford, N. T., Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1993) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2075823 · Cited by 18,773
Testing Structural Equation Models.
Mueller, C. W., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1994) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2074955 · Cited by 14,211
Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods
Davidian, M. (2003) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2003.s288 · Cited by 13,820
Research in Organizational Behavior.
Grimes, A. J., Cummings, L. L., & Staw, B. M. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392975 · Cited by 11,303
Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States.
Tullock, G., & Hirschman, A. O. H. (1970) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.2307/2325604 · Cited by 11,199
Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.4.3.272 · Cited by 9,587
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Dutton J. E., 1993, Academy of Management Review, 18, 397, 10.5465/amr.1993.9309035145 · DOI
- Edwards M. S., 2009, Voice and silence in organizations, 275
- Frese M., 2001, Research in organizational behavior, 23, 133
- Grant A. M., 2008, Research in organizational behavior, 28, 3
- Janis I. L., 1982, Victims of groupthink
- Morrison E. W., 2011, Academy of Management annals, 5, 373
- Morrison E. W., 2000, Academy of Management Review, 25, 706, 10.5465/amr.2000.3707697 · DOI · Paper page
- Pekel K., 1998, Studies in Intelligence, 41, 85
- Van Dyne L., 1995, Research in organizational behavior, 17, 215
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Morrison, E. W. (2014) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091328 · Cited by 1,836
Bolino, M. C., & Grant, A. M. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1153260 · Cited by 682
Chamberlin, M., Newton, D. W., & Lepine, J. A. (2017) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12185 · Cited by 532
Chen, A. S.-Y., & Hou, Y.-H. (2015) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.10.007 · Cited by 569
Fast, N. J., Burris, E. R., & Bartel, C. A. (2014) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0393 · Cited by 440
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Burris, E. R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Corresponding author
- Burris, Ethan R.
- ORCID
- Burris, Ethan R.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 851-875
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2039335540
- Cited by
- 800
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 74 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 64 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 48.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Labor Movements and Unions
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Keywords
- employee voice, managerial responses, organizational loyalty, threat perception, proactive behavior, social persuasion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
