The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Directive versus Empowering Leadership: A Field Experiment Comparing Impacts on Task Proficiency and Proactivity
Abstract
Using a field experiment in the United Arab Emirates, we compared the impacts of directive and empowering leadership on customer-rated core task proficiency and proactive behaviors. Results of tests for main effects demonstrated that both directive and empowering leadership increased work unit core task proficiency, but only empowering leadership increased proactive behaviors. Examination of boundary conditions revealed that directive leadership enhanced proactive behaviors for work units that were highly satisfied with their leaders, whereas empowering leadership had stronger effects on both core task proficiency and proactive behaviors for work units that were less satisfied with their leaders. We discuss implications for both theory and practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705 · Cited by 7,766
Developmental sequence in small groups.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0022100 · Cited by 5,778
Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement
LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428106296642 · Cited by 3,608
The ripple effect: emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior
Barsade, S. G. (2002) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3094912 · Cited by 3,361
Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership.
Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207 · Cited by 3,026
CREATIVE SELF-EFFICACY: ITS POTENTIAL ANTECEDENTS AND RELATIONSHIP TO CREATIVE PERFORMANCE.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069429 · Cited by 2,787
Proactive Behavior in Organizations
Crant, J. M. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630002600304 · Cited by 2,701
A New Model of Work Role Performance: Positive Behavior in Uncertain and Interdependent Contexts
Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24634438 · Cited by 2,533
Leadership Behavior and Employee Voice: Is the Door Really Open?
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.26279183 · Cited by 2,250
Employee Voice Behavior: Integration and Directions for Future Research
Morrison, E. W. (2011) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2011.574506 · Cited by 1,803
Cited by
Self-managing organizations: Exploring the limits of less-hierarchical organizing
Lee, M. Y., & Edmondson, A. C. (2017) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2017.10.002 · Cited by 540
Bartsch, S., Weber, E., Büttgen, M., & Huber, A. (2020) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/josm-05-2020-0160 · Cited by 475
Wang, H.-J., Demerouti, E., & Le Blanc, P. (2017) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2017.03.009 · Cited by 313
Empowering leadership and job crafting: The role of employee optimism
Thun, S., & Bakker, A. B. (2018) · Stress and Health · doi:10.1002/smi.2818 · Cited by 121
Leaders's language and employee proactivity: Enhancing psychological meaningfulness and vitality
Binyamin, G., & Brender-Ilan, Y. (2018) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2017.09.004 · Cited by 80
Jada, U. R., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2019) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-11-2017-0365 · Cited by 52
Schaubroeck, J. M., Lam, S. S. K., & Peng, A. C. (2016) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.02.002 · Cited by 48
Suhariadi, F., Sugiarti, R., Hardaningtyas, D., Mulyati, R., Kurniasari, E., Saadah, N., Yumni, H., & Abbas, A. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14082 · Cited by 36
Retracted
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, S. L., Liao, H., & Campbell, E. M.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2013-10
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1372-1395
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2149407616
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 18.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
