CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 998Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorGender Diversity and InequalityTeam Dynamics and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 117 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Implicit Voice Theories: Taken-for-Granted Rules of Self-Censorship at Work

Detert, James R., Edmondson, Amy C.·2011·Academy of Management Journal
DOI 10.5465/amj.2011.61967925
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In four studies, we examine implicit voice theories—taken-for-granted beliefs about when and why speaking up at work is risky or inappropriate. In Study 1, interview data from a large corporation suggest that fine-grained implicit theories underlie reluctance to voice even pro-organizational suggestions. Study 2 survey data address the generalizability of the implicit theories identified in Study 1. Studies 3 and 4 develop survey measures for five such theories, establishing the measures' discriminant validity and incremental predictive validity for workplace silence. Collectively, our results indicate that implicit voice theories are widely held and significantly augment explanation of workplace silence.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amj.2011.61967925

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 117 references

3 of the 117 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bargh J. A, 1997, Advances in social cognition, 10, 1
  2. Cosmides L., 2000, Handbook of emotions, 91
  3. Goffman E, 1974, Frame analysis
  4. Kish-Gephart J., 2009, Research in organizational behavior, 29, 163
  5. Morrison E. W., 2000, Academy of Management Review, 25, 706, 10.5465/amr.2000.3707697 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Nunnally J. C., 1994, Psychometric theory
  7. Ohman A, 2000, Handbook of emotions, 573
  8. Parker S., 2009, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 996

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
ORCID
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
2011-06
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
461-488
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
DOI
10.5465/amj.2011.61967925
OpenAlex
W2028351868
Cited by
998
References
117
Citations by year
2026: 172 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 94 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 19
FWCI
46.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
workplace silence, self-censorship, speaking up, mindset

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review