Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 295

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How Open System Intermediaries Address Institutional Failures: The Case of Business Incubators in Emerging-Market Countries

Dutt, Nilanjana, Hawn, Olga, Vidal, Elena, Chatterji, Aaron, McGahan, Anita, Mitchell, Will·2016·Academy of Management Journal
DOI 10.5465/amj.2012.0463
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In emerging-market countries, commercial institutions do not always develop sufficiently quickly or effectively to support ambitious entrepreneurs. How might intermediaries remedy these problems? We address this question by drawing on institutional literatures to develop the concept of “open system intermediaries.” Our research design involves examining business incubators in emerging markets as a form of open system intermediary. Empirically, we examine the relative emphasis that business incubators in emerging-market countries place on developing markets versus developing specific businesses. The study further examines how private, government, academic, and non-governmental organization sponsorship of incubators influences the mix of services that incubators provide. In sum, this work contributes to our understanding of how, why, and when intermediaries emerge to address institutional failures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amj.2012.0463

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 80 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Arrow K. J. 1969. The organization of economic activity: Issues pertinent to the choice of market versus non-market allocations. In Joint Economic Committee, United States Congress (Ed.),The analysis and evaluation of public expenditures: The PPP system; a compendium of papers submitted to the Subcommittee on Economy in Government of the Joint Economic Committee, Congress of the United States(vol. 1): 47–64. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
  2. 10.5465/19416520903053598 · doi:10.5465/19416520903053598 · Paper page
  3. Bringle R. G., 1996, The Journal of Higher Education, 67, 221, 10.2307/2943981 · doi:10.2307/2943981
  4. 10.5465/255822 · doi:10.5465/255822
  5. El-Namaki M. S. S., 1988, Long Range Planning, 21, 98, 10.1016/0024-6301(88)90014-3 · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(88)90014-3
  6. Ettlie J. E., 1982, Research Policy, 11, 173, 10.1016/0048-7333(82)90018-X · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90018-x
  7. Etzkowitz H., 2005, Research Policy, 34, 411, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.011 · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.011
  8. Frenkel A., 2008, European Planning Studies, 16, 189, 10.1080/09654310701814504 · doi:10.1080/09654310701814504
  9. 10.5465/amr.2000.3363529 · doi:10.5465/amr.2000.3363529
  10. 10.5465/3069285 · doi:10.5465/3069285 · Paper page
  11. 10.5465/1556400 · doi:10.5465/1556400 · Paper page
  12. Haapasalo H., 2004, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 4, 248, 10.1504/IJEIM.2004.004759 · doi:10.1504/ijeim.2004.004759
  13. 10.5465/1556394 · doi:10.5465/1556394 · Paper page
  14. Hsu P., 2003, R&D Management, 33, 79, 10.1111/1467-9310.00283 · doi:10.1111/1467-9310.00283
  15. Katz L., 2006, Negotiating international business: The negotiator’s reference guide to 50 countries around the world
  16. 10.5465/1556395 · doi:10.5465/1556395 · Paper page
  17. Lalkaka R., 2003, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 3, 31, 10.1504/IJEIM.2003.002217 · doi:10.1504/ijeim.2003.002217
  18. 10.5465/20159610 · doi:10.5465/20159610 · Paper page
  19. Phillips R. G., 2002, Technology in Society, 24, 299, 10.1016/S0160-791X(02)00010-6 · doi:10.1016/s0160-791x(02)00010-6
  20. Pilbeam K., 2005, Finance and financial markets, 10.1007/978-1-349-26273-1 · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-26273-1
  21. Van Auken H., 1999, Journal of Small Business Strategy, 10, 43

Cited by

See all 295

Metadata

Authors
Dutt, N., Hawn, O., Vidal, E., Chatterji, A., McGahan, A., & Mitchell, W.
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
2016-06
Volume
59
Issue
3
Pages
818-840
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
DOI
10.5465/amj.2012.0463
OpenAlex
W2321688023
Cited by
295
References
80
FWCI
31.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Open System Intermediaries Address Institutional Failures: The Case of Business Incubators in Emerging-Market Countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amj.2012.0463
The paper
Dutt, N., Hawn, O., Vidal, E., Chatterji, A., McGahan, A., & Mitchell, W. (2016). How Open System Intermediaries Address Institutional Failures: The Case of Business Incubators in Emerging-Market Countries. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0463

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.