Balancing Professional Autonomy and Managerial Goals amid Broad Technology Adoption Pressures: Intraprofessional Segmentation at a Finnish School
Abstract
Managers often desire to see their organization adopt new technologies but depend on autonomous professionals to use such technologies in practice. In seeking technology adoption, organizations thus must find a middle ground between professional autonomy and managerial goals. Extant scholarship has examined such middle grounds but has focused on adoptions of specific technologies. However, amid broad technology adoption pressures—expectations on organizations lacking precise prescriptions, success criteria, and sanctions—novel middle-ground approaches might emerge. Our 16-month ethnography of a Finnish school indicates that intraprofessional segmentation—specialization of work tasks within a professional community—can allow organizations to navigate technology adoption while balancing professional autonomy and managerial goals. This segmentation supported managers’ and certain teachers’ enthusiasm about new technologies at work, without undermining other teachers’ autonomy. This segmentation emerged, persisted, and intensified through two processes. First, it emerged through differentiating practices, which allowed a divergence of what teachers said and did regarding technology. Second, this segmentation persisted and intensified through reinforcing practices, which furthered differentiation by formalizing, reorganizing, and strengthening it. Our study contributes to scholarship on occupations and technology by showing how intraprofessional segmentation can help organizations…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Professionals' sensemaking becomes segmented over time with associated restructuring and role specialization.
“As a result, professionals' sensemaking is not only bound up with jurisdictional contestation at the boundaries of their expertise, but also becomes segmented over time with associated restructuring and role specialization (Goto, 2022;Koljonen and Chan, 2024).”
From The AI of the Beholder: Intra‐Professional Sensemaking of an Epistemic Technology (2025) · cites this paper as Koljonen and Chan, 2024
There is a relative lack of research on the importance of intra-professional segmentation in the workplace adoption of new technologies.
“These insights help to address the relative lack on research on the importance of intra-professional segmentation in the workplace adoption of new technologies (Koljonen and Chan, 2024).”
From The AI of the Beholder: Intra‐Professional Sensemaking of an Epistemic Technology (2025) · cites this paper as Koljonen and Chan, 2024
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449 · see citing works
Understanding and Validity in Qualitative Research
Maxwell, J. (1992) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.62.3.8323320856251826 · Cited by 2,951 · see citing works
Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0174 · Cited by 2,732 · see citing works
Leonardi, P. M. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/23043493 · Cited by 1,889 · see citing works
Bailey, D. E., Leonardi, P. M., & Barley, S. R. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0703 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Waardenburg, L., Huysman, M., & Sergeeva, A. V. (2022) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2021.1544 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Anthony, C. (2018) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2016.0334 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The AI of the Beholder: Intra‐Professional Sensemaking of an Epistemic Technology
Scarbrough, H., Chen, Y., & Patriotta, G. (2025) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13065 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
- Authors
- Koljonen, T., & Chan, C. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Boston College (US)
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2024-06
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 798-828
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W4390494929
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 5.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education, sociology, and vocational training
- Keywords
- professional autonomy, technology adoption, school teachers, occupational segmentation, middle ground, professional community, Finnish schools
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review