The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Model of Business School Students' Acceptance of a Web-Based Course Management System
Abstract
As business schools increasingly seek to incorporate Web-based information and communication technologies into the instructional process, there is a need for rigorous research into the factors affecting the successful integration of these technologies into management education. A key factor identified in prior management education research as critical to the successful implementation of such instructional technologies is student acceptance. We use the literatures on management education, technology acceptance, and change implementation to develop and test a model predicting business school students' acceptance of a Web-based course management system. Arguing that such a system which transitions traditional course-management processes to the Web constitutes an instance of a process change, we examine the role played by various change-enabling factors as well as change-motivating factors in students' acceptance of the system. We find that perceived incentive to use the system, perceived faculty encouragement to use the system, and peer encouragement to use the system are positively related to perceived usefulness of the system, which in turn is positively related to student acceptance of the system. We also find that awareness of the capabilities of the system, perceived availability of technical support, and prior experience with computer and Web use are positively related to perceived ease of use of the system, which in turn is positively related to student acceptance of the system. Implications for management education research and practice are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664
A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x · Cited by 3,802
Assessing IT Usage: The Role of Prior Experience
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249633 · Cited by 2,891
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1997) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01322.x · Cited by 1,669
Empirical Evaluation of the Revised Technology Acceptance Model
Szajna, B. (1996) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.42.1.85 · Cited by 1,656
Cited by
Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions
Garrison, D. R., & Arbaugh, J. B. (2007) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001 · Cited by 1,653
The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China
van Raaij, E. M., & Schepers, J. J. L. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.001 · Cited by 940
Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy
Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.025 · Cited by 496
Cho, V., Cheng, T. C. E., & Lai, W. M. J. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.014 · Cited by 329
Does the Community of Inquiry Framework Predict Outcomes in Online MBA Courses?
Arbaugh, J. B. (2008) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v9i2.490 · Cited by 230
Metadata
- Authors
- Martins, L. L., & Kellermanns, F. W.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Learning & Education
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2004-03
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-26
- ISSN
- 1537-260X (ISSN-L)
- 1944-9585
- OpenAlex
- W2052781747
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 30.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Model of Business School Students' Acceptance of a Web-Based Course Management System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5465/amle.2004.12436815
- The paper
- Martins, L. L., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2004). A Model of Business School Students' Acceptance of a Web-Based Course Management System. Academy of Management Learning & Education. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2004.12436815
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.