Cited by 96Management and Organizational StudiesManagement Theory and PracticeBusiness Strategies and Management Research

Typology-Driven Theorizing: A Response to Delbridge and Fiss

Snow, Charles C., Ketchen, David J.·2014·Academy of Management Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amr.2013.0388

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Snow and Ketchen Jr. (2014) argued that well-developed typologies are more than just classification systems; rather, a typology articulates relationships among constructs and facilitates testable predictions.

    “Snow and Ketchen Jr. (2014) argued that well-developed typologies are more than just classification systems; rather, a typology articulates relationships among constructs and facilitates testable predictions (cf.Doty and Glick 1994).”

    From Designing conceptual articles: four approaches (2020) · cites this paper as Snow and Ketchen Jr. (2014)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Snow, C. C., & Ketchen, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Auburn University (US)
Venue
Academy of Management Review
Published
2014-04
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
231-233
ISSN
  • 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-3807
OpenAlex
W2085466613
Cited by
96
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4
FWCI
10.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
Keywords
typology, theory development, organizational typology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review