The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corporate Citizenship: Toward an Extended Theoretical Conceptualization
Abstract
We critically examine the content of contemporary understandings of corporate citizenship and locate them within the extant body of research dealing with business-society relations. Our main purpose is to realize a theoretically informed definition of corporate citizenship that is descriptively robust and conceptually distinct from existing concepts in the literature. Specifically, our extended perspective exposes the element of “citizenship” and conceptualizes corporate citizenship as the administration of a bundle of individual citizenship rights—social, civil, and political—conventionally granted and protected by governments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance
Carroll, A. B. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257850 · Cited by 10,480
Cited by
How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions
Dahlsrud, A. (2008) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.132 · Cited by 4,092
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00950.x · Cited by 2,131
Corporate social responsibility and employee commitment
Collier, J., & Esteban, R. (2007) · Business Ethics: A European Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00466.x · Cited by 848
Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement
Henisz, W. J., Dorobantu, S., & Nartey, L. J. (2014) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2180 · Cited by 546
Voegtlin, C., & Greenwood, M. (2016) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.12.003 · Cited by 385
Employee Engagement and CSR: Transactional, Relational, and Developmental Approaches
Mirvis, P. (2012) · California Management Review · doi:10.1525/cmr.2012.54.4.93 · Cited by 238
Does corporate sustainability impact firm profitability? Evidence from India
Bodhanwala, S., & Bodhanwala, R. (2018) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-04-2017-0381 · Cited by 194
Masters of Disasters? An Empirical Analysis of How Societies Benefit from Corporate Disaster Aid
Ballesteros, L., Useem, M., & Wry, T. (2017) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0765 · Cited by 179
Transcending transmission: Towards a constitutive perspective on CSR communication
Schoeneborn, D., & Trittin, H. (2013) · Corporate Communications: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13563281311319481 · Cited by 170
Theory Assessment and Agenda Setting in Political CSR: A Critical Theory Perspective
Scherer, A. G. (2018) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12137 · Cited by 149
Improving how sustainability reports drive change: A critical discourse analysis
Higgins, C., & Coffey, B. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.101 · Cited by 155
The Debate on the Moral Responsibilities of Online Service Providers
Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2016) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9734-1 · Cited by 141
Corporate responsibility: Reflections on context and consequences
Halme, M., Roome, N., & Dobers, P. (2009) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2008.12.001 · Cited by 123
Girschik, V. (2020) · Business & Society · doi:10.1177/0007650318789867 · Cited by 96
Scherer, A. G., Neesham, C., Schoeneborn, D., & Scholz, M. (2023) · Business Ethics Quarterly · doi:10.1017/beq.2023.7 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Matten, D., & Crane, A.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 166-179
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-3807
- OpenAlex
- W2122155259
- Cited by
- 1,896
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 181.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
