CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 984Business Strategies and Management ResearchManagement and Organizational StudiesManagement Theory and Practice

EDITOR'S COMMENTS: CONSTRUCT CLARITY IN THEORIES OF MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATION.

Suddaby, Roy·2010·Academy of Management Review
DOI 10.5465/amr.2010.51141319
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amr.2010.51141319

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies into HR analytics, HRM algorithms, and AI deployed in HRM practices tend to use different terms to describe seemingly similar content, leading to a lack of construct clarity that may prevent the scholarly community from building a collective and coherent body of knowledge.

    “Studies into HR analytics ( Marler & Boudreau, 2017;Minbaeva, 2017;Tursunbayeva et al., 2018;Van den Heuvel & Bondarouk et al., 2017 ), HRM algorithms (Cheng & Hackett, 2021;Leicht-Deobald et al., 2019), and artificial intelligence (AI) deployed in HRM practices (Strohmeier & Piazza, 2015;Vrontis et al., 2021), while beginning to coalesce around key issues, tend to use different terms to describe”

    From Algorithmic human resource management: Synthesizing developments and cross-disciplinary insights on digital HRM (2021) · cites this paper as Suddaby, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suddaby, R.
Corresponding author
Suddaby, Roy
ORCID
Suddaby, Roy
Venue
Academy of Management Review
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
2010-07-01
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
346-357
ISSN
0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.5465/amr.2010.51141319
OpenAlex
W2326427413
Cited by
984
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 72 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 81 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 34
FWCI
34.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management Theory and Practice
Keywords
construct clarity, management theory, organizational theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review