CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,121Innovation and Knowledge ManagementEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesCreativity in Education and Neuroscience

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 262 of the 262 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From Creativity to Innovation: The Social Network Drivers of the Four Phases of the Idea Journey

Perry-Smith, Jill E., Mannucci, Pier Vittorio·2017·Academy of Management Review
DOI 10.5465/amr.2014.0462
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Interest has burgeoned, in recent years, in how social networks influence individual creativity and innovation. From both the theoretical and empirical points of view, this increased attention has generated many inconsistencies. In this article we propose that a conceptualization of the idea journey encompassing phases that the literature has so far overlooked can help solve existing tensions. We conceptualize four phases of the journey of an idea, from conception to completion: idea generation, idea elaboration, idea championing, and idea implementation. We propose that a creator has distinct primary needs in each phase: cognitive flexibility, support, influence, and shared vision, respectively. Individual creators successfully move through a phase when the relational and structural elements of their networks match the distinct needs of the phase. The relational and structural elements that are beneficial for one phase, however, are detrimental for another. We propose that in order to solve this seeming contradiction and the associated paradoxes, individual creators have to change interpretations and frames throughout the different phases. This, in turn, allows them to activate different network characteristics at the appropriate moment and successfully complete the idea journey from novel concept to a tangible outcome that changes the field.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amr.2014.0462

Cites

262 of 262 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 252 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Amabile T. M., 1996, Creativity in context
  2. Baumeister R. F., 1995, Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497, 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Brass D. J., 1995, Creative action in organizations, 94
  4. Coleman J. S., 1966, Medical innovation
  5. Csikszentmihalyi M., 1997, Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention
  6. Csikszentmihalyi M., 1999, Handbook of creativity, 313
  7. Eisenberger R., 1996, American Psychologist, 51, 1153, 10.1037/0003-066X.51.11.1153 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Frost P. J., 1991, Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 229
  9. Goffman E., 1974, Frame analysis
  10. Kanter R. M., 1983, The change masters: Innovation and productivity in American corporations
  11. Kanter R. M., 1988, Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169
  12. 10.5465/19416520.2010.494827 · DOI
  13. 10.5465/amr.1996.9704071863 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.5465/3069309 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Maidique M. A., 1980, Sloan Management Review, 21, 59
  16. 10.5465/amr.35.4.zok558 · DOI
  17. 10.5465/20159627 · DOI
  18. 10.5465/256657 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Ryan R. M., 2000, American Psychologist, 55, 68, 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Schon D. A., 1963, Harvard Business Review, 41, 77
  21. Steinbeck J., 1952, East of Eden
  22. Torrance E. P., 1988, The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological views, 43
  23. West M. A., 1990, Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies, 309
  24. 10.5465/amr.1993.3997517 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Perry-Smith, J. E., & Mannucci, P. V.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • London Business School (GB)
ORCID
Mannucci, Pier Vittorio
Venue
Academy of Management Review
Publisher
Academy of Management
Published
2017-01
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
53-79
ISSN
  • 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-3807
DOI
10.5465/amr.2014.0462
OpenAlex
W2253551909
Semantic Scholar
1f7b3dd167f0ee8d16c2fa7400b32ce9b1f0adbc
Cited by
1,121
References
252
Citations by year
2026: 116 · 2025: 130 · 2024: 138 · 2023: 149 · 2022: 125 · 2021: 188 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 28
FWCI
88.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
  • London Business School Research Online (London Business School) (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Keywords
social networks, individual creativity, innovation, idea generation, idea elaboration, idea implementation, cognitive flexibility, social support, influence, shared vision, network structure, framing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review