Cited by 125Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceDesign Education and PracticeInnovation and Knowledge Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 160 of the 160 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Toward a Meta-Theory of Creativity Forms: How Novelty and Usefulness Shape Creativity

Open access
Harvey, Sarah, Berry, James W.·2023·Academy of Management Review

Abstract

Creativity has long been defined in terms of novelty and usefulness. Surprisingly, however, there is relatively little agreement about the precise meaning of either dimension, the relationship between them, or the process through which they are produced. In this paper, we explore how novelty and usefulness have been used explicitly and implicitly in the creativity literature to reveal three ways to understand the definitional constructs. We propose that these three understandings give rise to distinct but interrelated forms of creativity: creativity as maximization, creativity as balance, and creativity as integration. Each form provides a different way of answering the question: what is creativity? We further theorize that the forms are shaped by the distal relations between novelty and usefulness, context, and process. Fundamentally, our theory suggests that developing a creative outcome for a distant alternative reality is a different form of creativity than developing an idea grounded in the present, so that as creators move through space and time, they also move through different forms of creativity. Our meta-theory furthers our understanding of creativity by revealing the centrality of usefulness in defining creativity; opening up the dynamics of the creative process; and highlighting interdependencies between ideas and context.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amr.2020.0110

Cites

160 of 160 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 154 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.5465/256995 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Burt G., 1994, The art of film music
  3. Csikszentmihalyi M., 1996, Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention.
  4. Csikszentmihalyi M., 1999, Handbook of creativity, 313
  5. Hogarth R., 1980, Judgement and choice.
  6. Koestler A., 1964, The act of creation.
  7. 10.5465/amr.35.4.zok558 · DOI
  8. Mumford M. D., 2002, Inquiry: Critical thinking across the disciplines, 22, 21
  9. 10.5465/256657 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Pointcare H., 1913, The foundations of science
  11. Shapiro R. J., 1968, Psychologia Africana Monograph Supplement, 4, 180
  12. Wallas G., 1926, The art of thought.
  13. Wallis S., 2010, Integral Review,, 6
  14. 10.5465/amr.1993.3997517 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Wright E. V., 1939, Gadsby

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–125 of 125

Metadata

Authors
Harvey, S., & Berry, J. W.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
Academy of Management Review
Published
2023-07
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
504-529
ISSN
  • 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-3807
OpenAlex
W4221038577
Cited by
125
References
154
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 10
FWCI
18.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academy of Management Review (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Design Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
Keywords
creativity, novelty, usefulness, creativity theory, creative process, idea generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review