The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combining Human and Artificial Intelligence: Hybrid Problem-Solving in Organizations
Abstract
Organizations increasingly use artificial intelligence (AI) to solve previously unexplored problems. While routine tasks can be automated, the intricate nature of exploratory tasks, such as solving new problems, demands a hybrid approach that integrates human intelligence with AI. We argue that the outcomes of this human–AI collaboration are contingent on the processes employed to combine human intelligence and AI. Our model unpacks three hybrid problem-solving processes and their outcomes: Compared to human problem-solving, autonomous search generates more distant solutions, sequential search enables more local solutions, and interactive search promotes more recombinative ones. Collectively, these hybrid problem-solving processes broaden the range of organizational search outcomes. We enrich the behavioral theory of the firm with a technology-conscious perspective of organizational problem-solving that complements its traditional human-centric perspective. Additionally, we contribute to the literature on AI in management by extending its scope from using predictive AI for routine tasks to generative AI applications for more exploratory tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942 · cited 1×
“This strategic use could provide organizations with a new mechanism to balance the dual exploration and exploitation requirements (March, 1991; O ’ Reilly & Tushman, 2008).”
BackgroundA survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning
Shorten, C., & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. (2019) · Journal of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-019-0197-0 · Cited by 13,203
Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data
Langley, A. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553248 · Cited by 7,008
Understanding dynamic capabilities
Winter, S. G. (2003) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.318 · Cited by 5,315
Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err.
Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000033 · Cited by 3,232 · cited 1×
“While humans sometimes ignore AI recommendations due to algorithm aversion (Dietvorst, Simmons, & Massey, 2015), they tend to follow them closely when complex outputs create cognitive over-load (Allen & Choudhury, 2022).”
BackgroundHow the machine “thinks”: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms
Burrell, J. (2016) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951715622512 · Cited by 3,196 · cited 1×
“Burrell (2016: 10) concluded that “ when a computer learns and subsequently builds its own representation ( … ) it does so without regard for human comprehension.”
BackgroundExplainable AI: a review of machine learning interpretability methods
Linardatos, P., Papastefanopoulos, V., & Kotsiantis, S. (2020) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23010018 · Cited by 2,922
Artificial Intelligence and Management: The Automation–Augmentation Paradox
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2018.0072 · Cited by 2,755
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 84
- 10.5465/amr.2010.0146 · DOI · Paper page
- Agrawal A., 2018, Prediction machines: The simple economics of artificial intelligence
- Allen R., 2022, Organization Science, 33, 149, 10.1287/orsc.2021.1554 · DOI
- Amabile T., 2020, Academy of Management Discoveries, 6, 351
- Anantrasirichai N., 2021, Artificial Intelligence Review, 55, 1
- Anthony C., 2021, Administrative Science Quarterly, 66, 1173, 10.1177/00018392211016755 · DOI · Paper page
- Bader V., 2019, Organization, 26, 655, 10.1177/1350508419855714 · DOI · Paper page
- Baumann O., 2015, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 32, 124, 10.1002/sres.2218 · DOI
- Baumann O., 2019, Journal of Management, 45, 285, 10.1177/0149206318808594 · DOI
- Bengio Y., 2012, JMLR Workshops and Conference Proceedings,, 27, 17
- Bengio Y., 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 35, 1798, 10.1109/TPAMI.2013.50 · DOI · Paper page
- Billinger S., 2023, Industrial and Corporate Change, 32, 208, 10.1093/icc/dtac029 · DOI
- Billinger S., 2021, Strategic Management Journal, 42, 361, 10.1002/smj.3225 · DOI
- Billinger S., 2014, Organization Science, 25, 93, 10.1287/orsc.2013.0829 · DOI
- Blohm I., 2020, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46, 1054, 10.1177/1042258720945206 · DOI
- Bond A. H., 2014, Readings in distributed artificial intelligence
- Brynjolfsson E., 2014, The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies
- Csaszar F. A., 2016, Strategic Management Journal, 37, 2031, 10.1002/smj.2440 · DOI
- Csaszar F. A., 2020, Organization Science, 31, 1198, 10.1287/orsc.2019.1346 · DOI
- Csaszar F. A., 2021, Academy of Management Annals, 16, 1, 10.5465/annals.2020.0192 · DOI
- Cyert R. M., 1963, A behavioral theory of the firm
- Deng J., 2022, Brief Bioinform, 23, bbab430, 10.1093/bib/bbab430 · DOI
- Dubin R., 1978, Theory building
- Ethiraj S. K., 2009, Organization Science, 20, 4, 10.1287/orsc.1080.0358 · DOI · Paper page
- Fang C., 2010, Organization Science, 21, 625, 10.1287/orsc.1090.0468 · DOI · Paper page
- Fleming L., 2001, Management Science, 47, 117, 10.1287/mnsc.47.1.117.10671 · DOI
- Fleming L., 2004, Strategic Management Journal, 25, 909, 10.1002/smj.384 · DOI · Paper page
- Fortnow L., 2013, The golden ticket: P, NP, and the search for the impossible, 10.1515/9781400846610 · DOI
- Furlan A., 2019, Organization Science, 30, 280, 10.1287/orsc.2018.1274 · DOI
- Gary M. S., 2011, Strategic Management Journal, 32, 569, 10.1002/smj.899 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/19416520.2012.656841 · DOI
- Gavetti G., 2000, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 113, 10.2307/2666981 · DOI · Paper page
- Goldberg D. E., 1989, Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning
- Goodfellow I., 2014, Advances in neural information processing systems,, 27, 2672
- Goodfellow I., 2016, Deep learning
- 10.5465/amr.2019.0178 · DOI · Paper page
- Greve H. R., 2003, Organizational learning from performance feedback: A behavioral perspective on innovation and change, 10.1017/CBO9780511615139 · DOI · Paper page
- Heath C., 2000, Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 153, 10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22005-4 · DOI
- Holzinger A., 2016, Brain Informatics, 3, 119, 10.1007/s40708-016-0042-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Jebara T., 2004, Machine learning: Discriminative and generative, 10.1007/978-1-4419-9011-2 · DOI
- Jeppesen L. B., 2010, Organization Science, 21, 1016, 10.1287/orsc.1090.0491 · DOI · Paper page
- Kaplan S., 2011, Journal of Management Studies, 48, 665, 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00983.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/3069433 · DOI · Paper page
- Kneeland M. K., 2020, Organization Science, 31, 535, 10.1287/orsc.2019.1328 · DOI
- Knudsen T., 2007, Organization Science, 18, 39, 10.1287/orsc.1060.0216 · DOI · Paper page
- Knudsen T., 2014, Administrative Science Quarterly, 59, 409, 10.1177/0001839214538021 · DOI
- Krakowski S., 2023, Strategic Management Journal, 44, 1425, 10.1002/smj.3387 · DOI · Paper page
- Laursen K., 2012, Industrial and Corporate Change, 21, 1181, 10.1093/icc/dts025 · DOI · Paper page
- Levinthal D., 2007, Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 586, 10.2189/asqu.52.4.586 · DOI
- Levinthal D. A., 1997, Management Science, 43, 934, 10.1287/mnsc.43.7.934 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/amr.2018.0181 · DOI · Paper page
- Luo X., 2021, Journal of Marketing, 85, 14, 10.1177/0022242920956676 · DOI · Paper page
- March J. S., 1958, Organizations
- Mitchell M., 2019, Artificial intelligence: A guide for thinking humans
- Möhlmann M., 2021, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 45, 1999, 10.25300/MISQ/2021/15333 · DOI · Paper page
- Nelson R., 1982, An evolutionary theory of economic change
- Newell A., 1959, Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Processing, 256
- Nigam A., 2016, Administrative Science Quarterly, 61, 551, 10.1177/0001839216653712 · DOI
- Oh S., 2019, Journal of Mechanical Design, 141, 11
- O’Reilly C. A., 2008, Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185, 10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002 · DOI · Paper page
- Orlikowski W. J., 2014, Organization Science, 25, 868, 10.1287/orsc.2013.0877 · DOI
- Ott T. E., 2017, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11, 306, 10.1002/sej.1257 · DOI
- 10.5465/amj.2012.0458 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/annals.2016.0018 · DOI · Paper page
- Posen H. E., 2012, Management Science, 58, 587, 10.1287/mnsc.1110.1420 · DOI
- Posen H. E., 2018, Strategic Management Journal, 39, 1350, 10.1002/smj.2751 · DOI
- Puranam P., 2021, Journal of Organization Design, 10, 75, 10.1007/s41469-021-00095-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/19416520.2015.1024498 · DOI
- Puranam P., 2016, Organization Science, 27, 323, 10.1287/orsc.2015.1033 · DOI
- Russell S., 2020, Artificial intelligence: A modern approach
- Savage N., 2023, Nature Biotechnology, 41, 585, 10.1038/s41587-023-01788-7 · DOI
- Schilling M. A., 2011, Research Policy, 40, 1321, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.06.009 · DOI · Paper page
- Shrestha Y. R., 2021, Journal of Business Research, 123, 588, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.068 · DOI · Paper page
- Simon H. A., 1957, Models of man: Social and rational
- Simon H. A., 1962, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, 467
- Simon H. A., 1965, The shape of automation for men and management
- Simon H. A., 1987, Interfaces, 17, 11, 10.1287/inte.17.5.11 · DOI · Paper page
- Stuart T. E., 1996, Strategic Management Journal, 17, 21, 10.1002/smj.4250171004 · DOI · Paper page
- Tripsas M., 2000, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1147, 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1147::AID-SMJ128>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI
- Uotila J., 2017, Management Information Systems Quarterly, 41, 1207, 10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.4.09 · DOI
- Urbina F., 2022, Nature Machine Intelligence, 4, 189, 10.1038/s42256-022-00465-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Walsh T., 2017, AI Magazine, 38, 58, 10.1609/aimag.v38i3.2702 · DOI · Paper page
- You S., 2022, Journal of Management Information Systems, 39, 336, 10.1080/07421222.2022.2063553 · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.2002.6587995 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Chowdhury, S., Budhwar, P., & Wood, G. (2024) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12824 · Cited by 221
“Central to this transformation is the emphasis on fostering AI–employee collaboration (Chowdhury et al. , 2022) and promoting hybrid problem-solving approaches (Raisch and Fomina, 2023) by creating environments where GAI tools and human expertise can co-exist to work as a team.”
BackgroundTheory Is All You Need: AI, Human Cognition, and Causal Reasoning
(2024) · doi:10.1287/stsc.2024.0189 · Cited by 151
Human-centered artificial intelligence: a field experiment
Krakowski, S., Haftor, D., Luger, J., Pashkevich, N., & Raisch, S. (2026) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.03849 · Cited by 53
Self-citationThe Crowdless Future? Generative AI and Creative Problem Solving
Boussioux, L., N. Lane, J., Zhang, M., Jacimovic, V., & Lakhani, K. R. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4533642 · Cited by 343
Ramaul, L., Ritala, P., Kostis, A., & Aaltonen, P. (2026) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13246 · Cited by 41
van den Broek, E., Sergeeva, A., & Huysman, M. (2026) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.13276 · Cited by 17
Herath, S., Bashardoust, A., Bole, Y., & Shrestha, Y. R. (2026) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1080/0960085x.2026.2616042 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Raisch, S., & Fomina, K.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 2025-04
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 441-464
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-3807
- OpenAlex
- W4390605317
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 41.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.