The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Negotiating effective institutions against climate change
Open accessAbstract
In environmental matters, the free riding generated by the lack of collective action is aggravated by concerns about leakages and by the desire to receive compensation in future negotiations. The dominant “pledge-and-review” approach to mitigation will deliver appealing promises and renewed victory statements, only to prolong the waiting game. The climate change global commons problem will be solved only through coherent carbon pricing. We discuss the roadmap for the negotiation process. Negotiators must return to the fundamentals: the need for uniform carbon pricing across countries, for verification, and for a governance process to which countries would commit. Each country would enjoy subsidiarity in its allocation of efforts within the country. We suggest an enforcement scheme based on financial and trade penalties to induce all countries to participate and comply with the agreement. Finally, the choice among economic approaches, whether a carbon price commitment or a cap-andtrade, is subject to trade-offs, on which alternative reasonable views may co-exist. We discuss monitoring reasons for why we personally favor an international cap-and-trade agreement.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Hardin, G. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 · Cited by 25,167
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Ostrom, E. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511807763 · Cited by 20,653
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Field, B. C., & Elinor Ostrom, B. (1992) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146384 · Cited by 19,100
Weitzman, M. L. (1974) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2296698 · Cited by 2,071
Climate Clubs: Overcoming Free-riding in International Climate Policy
Nordhaus, W. (2015) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.15000001 · Cited by 1,362
Competition in the British Electricity Spot Market
Green, R. J., & Newbery, D. (1992) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261846 · Cited by 1,342
Competition in Telecommunications
Mandy, D. M., Laffont, J., & Tirole, J. (2001) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1061523 · Cited by 948
Self-citationTransmission Rights and Market Power on Electric Power Networks
Joskow, P. L., & Jean Tirole, Z. (2000) · The RAND Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2600996 · Cited by 555
Posner, E. A., & Weisbach, D. (2010) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400834402 · Cited by 386
Markets for Clean Air: The U.S. Acid Rain Program
Cooper, R. N., Ellerman, A. D., Joskow, P. L., Schmalensee, R., Montero, J., & Bailey, E. M. (2000) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20049990 · Cited by 356
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- 10.1111/1467-6451.00115 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.04.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.035 · DOI
- 10.3390/su6020794 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jedc.2005.09.008 · DOI
- 10.1515/1553-3832.1787 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00081-6 · DOI
- De Perthuis, C. and L.-A. Jouvet (2015). "Les voies d'un accord climatique ambitieux en 2015" Institut Louis Bachelier, Opinions et Debats
- 10.1017/CBO9780511528576 · DOI
- 10.1086/261846 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 · DOI · Paper page
- IPCC (2014). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change, Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlomer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel and J.C. Minx (eds.)], Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA
- 10.2307/2600996 · DOI
- 10.1016/0047-2727(96)01575-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/0047-2727(96)01576-9 · DOI
- 10.1257/aer.15000001 · DOI · Paper page
- OECD (2013). Climate and Carbon: Aligning Prices and Policies OECD Environment Policy Paper 1, OECD Publishing, Paris
- 10.1017/CBO9780511807763 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5547/2160-5890.1.1.10 · DOI
- Trotignon, R., Jouvet, P.A, Soliera, B., Quemina, S. and J. Elbezea (2015). "European Carbon Market: Lessons on the Impact of a "Market Stability Reserve" using the Zephyr Model" mimeo, Chaire Economie du Climat, University Paris Dauphine
- 10.2307/2296698 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
EU in search of a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism
Bellora, C., & Fontagné, L. (2023) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106673 · Cited by 280
Cosbey, A., Droege, S., Fischer, C., & Munnings, C. (2019) · Review of Environmental Economics and Policy · doi:10.1093/reep/rey020 · Cited by 217
Bolton, P. G. M., Halem, Z. M., & Kacperczyk, M. T. (2022) · Journal of applied corporate finance · doi:10.1111/jacf.12502 · Cited by 103
Political economies of climate change
Paterson, M., & P.-Laberge, X. (2018) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.506 · Cited by 106
van der Mensbrugghe, D. Y., Peszko, G., Ward, J. R., Golub, A., Zenghelis, D. A., Marijs, C., Schopp, A., Rogers, J. A., & Midgley, A. (2020) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1340-5 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Gollier, C., & Tirole, J.
- ORCID
- Gollier, Christian
- Venue
- Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy
- Published
- 2015-04-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2160-5882 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2225701017
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7
- FWCI
- 32.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Toulouse Capitole Publications (University Toulouse 1 Capitole) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › International Environmental Law and Policies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
- Keywords
- climate change negotiations, carbon pricing, emissions trading, free-riding, collective action, leakage, global commons, enforcement mechanisms, international climate agreements, subsidiarity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review