The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Participation in design things
Open accessAbstract
This paper discusses the design of things. This is done in an attempt to conceptually explore some of the political and practical challenges to participatory design today. Which things, and which participants? The perspective is strategic and conceptual. Two approaches are in focus, participatory design (designing for use before use) and meta-design (designing for design after design). With this framing the challenge for professional design to participate in public controversial things is considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces
Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.7.1.111 · Cited by 3,238
Redström, J. (2008) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2008.05.001 · Cited by 157
Cited by
Participatory design and "democratizing innovation"
Björgvinsson, E., Ehn, P., & Hillgren, P.-A. (2010) · Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference · doi:10.1145/1900441.1900448 · Cited by 709
Self-citationInfrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design
Dantec, C. A. L., & DiSalvo, C. (2013) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312712471581 · Cited by 564
The diversity of participatory design research practice at PDC 2002–2012
Halskov, K., & Hansen, N. B. (2015) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.003 · Cited by 365
Tensions in human-centred design
Steen, M. (2011) · CoDesign · doi:10.1080/15710882.2011.563314 · Cited by 258
Le Dantec, C. A., & Fox, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing · doi:10.1145/2675133.2675147 · Cited by 255
Tying Knots: Participatory Infrastructuring at Work
Bødker, S., Dindler, C., & Iversen, O. S. (2017) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-017-9268-y · Cited by 237
What is Human-Centered about Human-Centered AI? A Map of the Research Landscape
Capel, T., & Brereton, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580959 · Cited by 228
Thing Ethnography: Doing Design Research with Non-Humans
Giaccardi, E., Cila, N., Speed, C., & Caldwell, M. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems · doi:10.1145/2901790.2901905 · Cited by 146
What is it that makes participation in design participatory design?
Luck, R. (2018) · Design Studies · doi:10.1016/j.destud.2018.10.002 · Cited by 140
User gains and PD aims: assessment from a participatory design project
Bossen, C., Dindler, C., & Iversen, O. S. (2010) · Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference · doi:10.1145/1900441.1900461 · Cited by 105
Lazar, A., Feuston, J. L., Edasis, C., & Piper, A. M. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173925 · Cited by 94
Institutional constraints: the forms and limits of participatory design in the public realm
Lodato, T., & DiSalvo, C. (2018) · Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers - Volume 1 · doi:10.1145/3210586.3210595 · Cited by 86
Simonsen, J., Karasti, H., & Hertzum, M. (2020) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-019-09365-w · Cited by 74
Oswal, S. K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 37th ACM International Conference on the Design of Communication · doi:10.1145/3328020.3353957 · Cited by 58
Holten Møller, N. L., Fitzpatrick, G., & Le Dantec, C. A. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3361125 · Cited by 36
Documenting Data Production Processes: A Participatory Approach for Data Work
Miceli, M., Yang, T., Alvarado Garcia, A., Posada, J., Wang, S. M., Pohl, M., & Hanna, A. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3555623 · Cited by 28
Alves Villarinho Lima, B., & Almeida, L. D. A. (2021) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77431-8_23 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Ehn, P.
- Venue
- Diva portal (Dalarna University Library)
- Published
- 2008-10-01
- Pages
- 92-101
- DOI
- 10.5555/1795234.1795248
- OpenAlex
- W1535418185
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 49.78
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
