Cited by 111Social Media in Health EducationInnovations in Medical EducationImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Itʼs Your Own Risk: Medical Studentsʼ Perspectives on Online Professionalism

Chretien, Katherine C., Goldman, Ellen F., Beckman, Louis, Kind, Terry·2010·Academic Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: U.S. medical schools have reported unprofessional online content by medical students. To inform institutional policies and curricula, we conducted a qualitative study exploring medical student perspectives on online posting. METHOD: Six focus groups were conducted with students from a single institution in November 2009. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative methods. RESULTS: Sixty-four students participated. Besides HIPAA violations and illegal activities, students disagreed as to what was inappropriate to post. They experienced online identity conflicts and described ambivalence toward Facebook. Students were concerned about online activity risks and lack of personal control. Their postings were guided by common sense and what they believed was expected from medical students. Students desired recommendations for appropriate content and suggested raising awareness through discussion. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students viewed online postings through a lens of personal risk. They desired recommendations but were sensitive to feeling controlled by their school.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/acm.0b013e3181ed4778

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Important differences exist in perceptions of inappropriate social media behavior among various stakeholders.

    “Further, important differences exist in perceptions of inappropriate SM behavior among various stakeholders.”
  • Medical students often regard themes of speech, alcohol, and dress as components of online 'social identity' rather than potential unprofessional behavior.

    “Medical students often regard themes of speech, alcohol, and dress as components of online '' social identity '' rather than potential unprofessional behavior. 13,14”
  • Medical students often regard themes of speech, alcohol, and dress as components of online social identity rather than potential unprofessional behavior.

    “Medical students often regard themes of speech, alcohol, and dress as components of online ‘‘social identity’’ rather than potential unprofessional behavior [154,155].”
  • Consensus about what constitutes unprofessional behavior has still not been reached.

    “It seems that consensus about what constitutes unprofessional behavior, even evoked as a question since Chretien et al’s [155] study in 2010, has still not been reached.”
  • Medical students' perspectives on appropriate social media use and their current practices have not been well explored.

    “Despite this meteoric rise in use, the perspectives of students regarding the appropriate utilization of this technology (as well as their current practices) have not been well explored. 21”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chretien, K. C., Goldman, E. F., Beckman, L., & Kind, T.
Corresponding author
Chretien, Katherine C.
Venue
Academic Medicine
Published
2010-10
Volume
85
Issue
10 Suppl
Pages
S68-S71
ISSN
1040-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2295911421
Cited by
111
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
9.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Academic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
medical students, online professionalism, social media, Facebook, online posts, professional conduct, individual risk, online identity, student perceptions, medical education policy
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Male, Professional Competence, Students, Medical, United States, Focus Groups, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review