CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 324Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyEssential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Natural Products as Manipulators of Rumen Fermentation

Open access
Wallace, R. John, McEwan, Neil R., McIntosh, Freda M., Teferedegne, Belete, Newbold, C. James·2002·Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
DOI 10.5713/ajas.2002.1458
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

There is increasing interest in exploiting natural products as feed additives to solve problems in animal nutrition and livestock production.Essential oils and saponins are two types of plant secondary compounds that hold promise as natural feed additives for ruminants.This paper describes recent advances in research into these additives.The research has generally concentrated on protein metabolism.Dietary essential oils caused rates of NH 3 production from amino acids in ruminal fluid taken from sheep and cattle receiving the oils to decrease, yet proteinase and peptidase activities were unchanged.Hyper-ammonia-producing (HAP) bacteria were the most sensitive of ruminal bacteria to essential oils in pure culture.Essential oils also slowed colonisation and digestion of some feedstuffs.Ruminobacter amylophilus may be a key organism in mediating these effects.Saponin-containing plants and their extracts appear to be useful as a means of suppressing the bacteriolytic activity of rumen ciliate protozoa and thereby enhancing total microbial protein flow from the rumen.The effects of some saponins seems to be transient, which may stem from the hydrolysis of saponins to their corresponding sapogenin aglycones, which are much less toxic to protozoa.Saponins also have selective antibacterial effects which may prove useful in, for example, controlling starch digestion.These studies illustrate that plant secondary compounds, of which essential oils and saponins comprise a small proportion, have great potential as 'natural' manipulators of rumen fermentation, to the potential benefit of the farmer and the environment.(Asian-Aust.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5713/ajas.2002.1458

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Eadie, J. M. and W. J. Shand. 1981. The effect of synperonic NP9 upon ciliate free and faunated sheep. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 40, 113A.
  2. Hostettmann, K. and A. Marston. 1995. Saponins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Newbold, C. J. and D. G. Chamberlain. 1988. Lipids as rumen defaunating agents. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 47:154A.
  4. Teferedegne, B. 2000. The use of foliage from multipurpose trees to manipulate rumen fermentation. Ph.D. thesis, University of Aberdeen, UK.
  5. Tsuda, Y. Sasaki and R. Kawashima). San Diego, California: Academic Press, Inc. pp. 625-654.
  6. Williams, A. G. and G. S. Coleman. 1997. The rumen protozoa. In The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem (Ed. P. N. Hobson and C. S. Stewart). London: Blackie Academic and Professional. pp. 73- 120.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–319 of 319

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wallace, R. J., McEwan, N. R., McIntosh, F. M., Teferedegne, B., & Newbold, C. J.
Affiliations
University of Aberdeen (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences
Publisher
Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies
Published
2002-01-01
Volume
15
Issue
10
Pages
1458-1468
ISSN
  • 1011-2367 (ISSN-L)
  • 1976-5517
DOI
10.5713/ajas.2002.1458
OpenAlex
W2161059150
Cited by
324
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 9
FWCI
10.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Department for International Development
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
Keywords
natural feed additives, rumen fermentation, essential oils, saponins, plant secondary metabolites, ruminants, ammonia synthesis, rumen ciliate protozoa, bacterial lysis, starch hydrolysis, sheep, cattle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review