Cited by 13Cancer survivorship and careWomen's cancer prevention and managementCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Predictors of symptom distress in women with breast cancer during the first chemotherapy cycle

Open access
Boehmke, Marcia M., Brown, Jean K.·2005·Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the extent to which personal characteristics and "person factors" predict symptom distress during the first cycle of chemotherapy. DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal, correlational. SAMPLE AND SETTING: 120 women with Stage I and II breast cancer starting their first cycle of chemotherapy were recruited from six diverse oncology settings. METHODS: Self-report questionnaires were completed prior to the beginning, the nadir, and the end of the first chemotherapy cycles. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Personal characteristics, "person factors", and symptom distress. FINDINGS: Optimism and external locus of control predicted low symptom distress levels at the both the nadir and at the end of the first cycle. Fatigue, appearance, and insomnia caused the greatest distress with higher symptom distress scores reported at the nadir with a mean item score of 1.98 on a five-point Likert scale. CONCLUSIONS: Women who maintained a positive outlook, and trusted their health care providers experienced lower levels of symptom distress. Findings suggest that most women experienced some symptom distress, particularly during the middle of the first cycle of chemotherapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5737/1181912x154215220

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most women diagnosed with breast cancer experience heightened distress.

    “Most women diagnosed with breast cancer experience heightened distress (e.g., Boehmke & Brown, 2005)”

    From An online stress management workbook for breast cancer (2014) · cites this paper as Boehmke & Brown, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boehmke, M. M., & Brown, J. K.
Affiliations
University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Venue
Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal
Published
2005
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
215-220
ISSN
1181-912X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073488495
Cited by
13
References
17
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Oncology Nursing Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
breast cancer, chemotherapy, symptom distress, optimism, locus of control, fatigue, insomnia, appearance, personal factors, women, predictors of distress
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Attitude to Health, Body Image, Breast Neoplasms, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Internal-External Control, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Nausea, New York, Pain, Predictive Value of Tests, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Nursing Methodology Research, Linear Models, Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review