Cited by 32Cancer survivorship and careWomen's cancer prevention and managementCancer-related cognitive impairment studies

Determinants of fatigue 6 and 12 months after surgery in women with early-stage breast cancer: a comparison with women with benign breast problems

De Vries, Jolanda, Van der Steeg, Alida F., Roukema, Jan A.·2009·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to examine the predictors of fatigue 6 and 12 months after surgical treatment in women with early-stage breast cancer (BC group) and in women with benign breast problems (BBP group) in a prospective follow-up study.Methods Women entered the study prior to diagnosis and completed questionnaires on personality factors, psychological factors, and social support. Fatigue was assessed 6 and 12 months after diagnosis (BBP group) or surgical treatment (BC group). Clinical data were taken from medical records.Results In the BC group (n=117), fatigue at 6 months was predicted by trait anxiety (P<.001) and extraversion (P<.05). Trait anxiety (P<.05), extraversion (P<.05), and depressive symptoms (P<.05) predicted fatigue at 12 months. In the BBP group (n=190), the predictors were trait anxiety (P<.001) for fatigue at 6 months, and trait anxiety (P<.001) and neuroticism (P<.01) for fatigue at 12 months.Conclusion Many patients who are already fatigued before diagnosis remain tired regardless of diagnosis. Trait anxiety is strongly related to fatigue in both groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.11.008

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Vries, J., Van der Steeg, A. F., & Roukema, J. A.
Affiliations
Tilburg University (NL)
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
66
Issue
6
Pages
495-502
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075621200
Cited by
32
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
Keywords
postoperative fatigue, early breast cancer, trait anxiety, extraversion, neuroticism, depressive symptoms, personality traits, social support, predictors of fatigue
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms, Cognition, Demography, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Personality Disorders, Postoperative Period, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Social Support, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review