Cited by 101Attachment and Relationship DynamicsImpact of Technology on AdolescentsMedia and Digital Communication

The quality of online, offline, and mixed-mode friendships among users of a social networking site

Open access
Antheunis, Marjolijn L., Valkenburg, Patti M., Peter, Jochen·2012·Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace

Abstract

The first aim of this study was to compare the quality of online, offline, and mixed-mode friendships (i.e., friendships that originate online and extend to offline settings) among users of a social networking site. The second aim was to investigate the relative contribution of proximity, perceived similarity, and social attraction to the quality of each of the three types of friendships. We surveyed 2,188 members of a Dutch social networking site. Results showed that the quality of all three types of friendships increased over time. The differences in quality between online and offline friendships remained significant over time, but those between mixed-mode and offline friendships disappeared. Proximity did not affect the quality of any of the three types of friendships. Perceived similarity was the most important predictor of online friendships, whereas social attraction was the most important predictor of mixed-mode and offline friendships. Our results are discussed in the light of both interpersonal and computer-mediated communication theories.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5817/cp2012-3-6

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1969). Interpersonal attraction . Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
  2. Clark, M., & Pataki, S. (1995). Interpersonal processes influencing attraction and relationships. In A. Tesser (Ed.), Advanced social psychology (pp. 283-331). St. Louis: McGraw Hill.
  3. ComScore, Inc (2007). Social networking goes global: major social networking sites substantially expanded their global visitor base during past year , Retrieved from http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1555
  4. Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1954). Friendship as social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In M. Berger, T. Abel & C. H. Page (Eds.), Freedom and control in modern society . Toronto, Canada: Nostrand.
  5. Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 367-390). New York: Wiley.
  6. VanAlstyne, M., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1996, December). Electronic communities: Global village or cyberbalkans? Paper presented at the 17th International Conference on Information Systems, Cleveland, OH.
  7. Walther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in; computer mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529-561). Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antheunis, M. L., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J.
Venue
Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace
Published
2012-12-01
Volume
6
Issue
3
ISSN
1802-7962 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2318221287
Cited by
101
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
online friendship, friendship quality, social networking sites, perceived similarity, social attraction, proximity, computer-mediated communication, interpersonal relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review