Cited by 93Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionWorkplace Violence and Bullying

Cyberbullying and self-esteem in Australian adults

Open access
Brack, Kerryn, Caltabiano, Nerina·2014·Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace

Abstract

Cyberbullying research is currently focused on identifying personal factors which increase the risk of an individual being involved in the behaviour. Recent findings indicate that within the web of cyberbullying culture a large group of individuals are both cyberbullies and victims. This group of cyberbully/victims has been shown to differ from pure cyberbullies or victims on various factors during adolescence; particularly self-esteem. However, little research to date has investigated cyberbullying behaviour in adults. The current study examined the prevalence of cyberbully typologies and their relationship with self-esteem within a convenience sample of 164 Australian young adults (72% being females; 17-25 years). Results found that the largest group identified were cyberbully/victims (62%), followed by individuals not involved (17%), cyberbullies (11%) and cybervictims (10%) respectively. The ratio of males and females in each of the four cyberbully typologies was similar. Contrary to previous research, all four cyberbully typologies reported similar levels of self-esteem. These findings suggest that research should examine cyberbullying behaviour across all age groups to determine if this is related to different factors in adolescence compared to adulthood. Limitations and future recommendations are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5817/cp2014-2-7

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Females engage more with cyberbullying as both perpetrators and victims.

    “Females engage more with cyberbullying as both perpetrators and victims owing to their higher involvement in indirect forms of aggression133,134 and more frequent use of social networking sites135,136.”

    From Umbrella review of meta-analyses on the risk factors, protective factors, consequences and interventions of cyberbullying victimization (2024) · cites this paper as [133]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that male and female young adults were equally likely to be cyberbullies or cybervictims, contrary to the claim that females engage more in both roles. The paper discusses greater female involvement in relational bullying as a proposed explanation, not as a finding of greater female cyberbullying. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Erdur-Baker, O., & Kavsut, F. (2007). A new face of peer bullying: Cyber bullying. Journal of Euroasian Educational Research, 27 , 31-42. Abstract retrieved from http://www.ejer.com.tr/0DOWNLOAD/pdfler/eng/1041356149.pdf
  2. Mitchell, K., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2004). Victimisation of youths on the internet. In J.L. Mullings, J. W. Marquart & D.J. Hartley (Eds.), The victimisation of children: Emerging issues (pp. 1-39). New York, NY: The Haworth Maltreatment and Trauma Press
  3. Robins, R., Trzesniewski, K., Tracy, J., Gosling, S., & Potter, J. (2002). Global self-esteem across the lifespan. Psychology and Aging, 17 (3), 423-434. doi: 10.1037//08827974.17.3.423 · DOI
  4. Willard, N. (2005). Cyberbullying and cyberthreats. In Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools National Conference (p. 21-31) . Washington, D.C., United States of America.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brack, K., & Caltabiano, N.
Affiliations
James Cook University (AU)
Venue
Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace
Published
2014-07-01
Volume
8
Issue
2
ISSN
1802-7962 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054946726
Cited by
93
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1
FWCI
9.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
Keywords
cyberbullying, self-esteem, young adults, prevalence, gender differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review