Cited by 16Study and Philosophy of ReligionEvolution and Science EducationTheology and Philosophy of Evil

The Return of the God Hypothesis

Meyer, Stephen C., Institute for Interdisciplinary Research·1999·Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies

Abstract

Historian of science Frederic Bumham has stated that the "God hypothesis" is now more respectable hypothesis than at any time in the last one hundred years. This essay explores recent evidence from cosmology, physics, and biology, which provides epistemoiogical support, though not proof, for belief in God as conceived by a theistic worldview. It develops a notion of epistemoiogical support based upon explanatory power, rather than just deductive entailment. It also evaluates the explanatory power of theism and its main metaphysical competitors with respect to several classes of scientific evidence. The cmclusion follows that theism explains a wide ensemble of metaphysically-significant evidences more adequately and comprehensively than other major worldviews or metaphysical systems. Thus, unlike much recent scholarship that characterizes science as either conflicting with theistic belief or entirely neutral with respect to it, this essay concludes that scientific evidence actually supports such.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5840/jis1999111/21

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ID leaders Stephen C. Meyer and John G. West, Jr. appealed to 'teach the controversy' in the Ohio Board of Education case.

    “ID leaders Stephen C. Meyer and John G. West, Jr. appealed to this in the Ohio Board of Education case (42,92).”

    From Creationism and intelligent design. (2003) · cites this paper as [42]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meyer, S. C., & Institute for Interdisciplinary Research
Corresponding author
Meyer, Stephen C.
Venue
Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies
Published
1999
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
1-38
ISSN
0890-0132 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W19489624
Cited by
16
References
64
Citations by year
2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Evolution and Science Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Theology and Philosophy of Evil
Keywords
theism, epistemic support, explanatory power, cosmology, origin of the universe, origin of life, philosophy of religion, metaphysical naturalism, science and religion, scientific evidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review