The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anti-Luck Virtue Epistemology
Open accessAbstract
It is argued that there are two ‘master’ intuitions about knowledge⎯an anti-luck intuition and an ability intuition⎯and that these impose distinct epistemic demands. It is claimed that recognising this fact leads one towards a new proposal in the theory of knowledge⎯anti-luck virtue epistemology⎯which can avoid the problems that afflict other theories of knowledge. This proposal is motivated in contrast to two other ways of thinking about knowledge which are shown to be ultimately unsuccessful: anti-luck epistemology and virtue epistemology. Finally, a diagnosis is offered of why our concept of knowledge should have the kind of structure dictated by anti-luck virtue epistemology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Fricker, M. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001 · Cited by 9,198
Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?
Gettier, E. L. (1963) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/23.6.121 · Cited by 3,127
Williamson, T. (2002) · doi:10.1093/019925656x.001.0001 · Cited by 2,788
Virtues of the Mind: An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,211
Discrimination and Perceptual Knowledge
Goldman, A. I. (1976) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2025679 · Cited by 1,870
Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
Williams, B. (2010) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · doi:10.1515/9781400825141 · Cited by 1,615
Plantinga, A. (1993) · doi:10.1093/0195078624.001.0001 · Cited by 995
How to Defeat Opposition to Moore
Sosa, E. (1999) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/0029-4624.33.s13.7 · Cited by 969
Chisholm, R. M. (1967) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 864
Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology.
McGinn, M., & Dancy, J. (1986) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2219889 · Cited by 621
Cited by
Understanding, Explanation, and Scientific Knowledge
Khalifa, K. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108164276 · Cited by 331
Epistemic Virtue and the Epistemology of Education
Pritchard, D. (2013) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12022 · Cited by 122
Self-citationKnowledge, justification, and (a sort of) safe belief
Whiting, D. (2020) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-01905-z · Cited by 34
Pharmacological cognitive enhancement and cheapened achievement: A new dilemma.
Gordon, E. C., & Dunn, L. (2021) · Neuroethics · doi:10.1007/s12152-021-09477-5 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Pritchard, D., & Journal of Philosophy, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Philosophy
- Publisher
- Philosophy Documentation Center
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 247-279
- ISSN
- 0022-362X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1503848103
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 261.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anti-Luck Virtue Epistemology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5840/jphil201210939
- The paper
- Pritchard, D., & Journal of Philosophy, I. (2012). Anti-Luck Virtue Epistemology. Journal of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil201210939
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.