The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Democratic phoenix: reinventing political activism
Abstract
Conventional wisdom suggests that citizens in many countries have become disengaged from the traditional channels of political participation. Commentators highlight warning signs including sagging electoral turnout, rising anti-party sentiment, and the decay of civic organizations. But are these concerns justified? This book, first published in 2002, compares systematic evidence for electoral turnout, party membership, and civic activism in countries around the world and suggests good reasons to question assumptions of decline. Not only is the obituary for older forms of political activism premature, but new forms of civic engagement may have emerged in modern societies to supplement traditional modes. The process of societal modernization and rising levels of human capital are primarily responsible, although participation is also explained by the structure of the state, the role of agencies, and social inequalities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies since 1945
Franklin, M. N., Eijk, C. V. D., Evans, D., Fotos, M., Hirczy de Mino, W., Marsh, M., & Wessels, B. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511616884 · Cited by 1,421
The embarrassment of riches? A meta-analysis of individual-level research on voter turnout
Smets, K., & van Ham, C. (2013) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2012.12.006 · Cited by 799
A conceptual map of political participation
van Deth, J. W. (2014) · Acta Politica · doi:10.1057/ap.2014.6 · Cited by 610
Same Game, Different Rules? Gender Differences in Political Participation
Coffé, H., & Bolzendahl, C. (2010) · Sex Roles · doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9729-y · Cited by 529
Theocharis, Y., Lowe, W., van Deth, J. W., & García-Albacete, G. (2015) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2014.948035 · Cited by 504
Democratization and Research Methods
Coppedge, M. (2012) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139016179 · Cited by 303
Ferreira, P. D., Azevedo, C. N., & Menezes, I. (2012) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.09.004 · Cited by 98
Oser, J. (2017) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1364-8 · Cited by 75
Buying In to Social Change: How Private Consumption Choices Engender Concern for the Collective
Atkinson, L. (2012) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716212448366 · Cited by 64
The ‘ballot and the brick’: Protest, voting and non-voting in post-apartheid South Africa
Runciman, C. (2016) · Journal of Contemporary African Studies · doi:10.1080/02589001.2017.1287347 · Cited by 35
Hvenegaard Rasmussen, C., Rydbeck, K., & Larsen, H. (2022) · doi:10.4324/9781003188834 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Venue
- Choice Reviews Online
- Publisher
- American Library Association
- Published
- 2003-09-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 41-0603-41-0603
- ISSN
- 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-8253
- OpenAlex
- W48428665
- Cited by
- 1,505
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.