Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 732

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Oxford handbook of ethical theory

·2006·Choice Reviews Online

Abstract

David Copp: Introduction: Meta-Ethics and Normative Ethics PART I: Meta-Ethics 1: Geoffrey Sayre-McCord, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill: Moral Realism 2: Philip Quinn, University of Notre Dame: Theological Voluntarism 3: Nick Sturgeon, Cornell University: Ethical Naturalism 4: Jonathan Dancy, University of Reading and University of Texas at Austin: Non-Naturalism 5: Simon Blackburn, University of Cambridge: Anti-Realist Expressivism and Quasi-Realism 6: Philip Kitcher, Columbia University: Biology and Ethics 7: Justin D'Arms, The Ohio State University, and Dan Jacobson, Bowling Green State University: Sensibility Theory and Projectivism 8: Michael Slote, University of Miami: Moral Sentimentalism and Moral Psychology 9: Jamie Dreier, Brown University: Moral Relativism and Moral Nihilism 10: Peter Railton, University of Michigan: Human Theory of Practical Rationality 11: Stephen Darwall, University of Michigan: Morality and Practical Reason: A Kantian Approach 12: John Martin Fischer, University of California, Riverside : Free Will and Moral Responsibility PART II: Normative Ethical Theory 13: Thomas Hurka, University of Toronto: Value Theory 14: David Brink, University of California, San Diego and University of San Diego Law School: Some Forms and Limits of Consequentialism 15: David McNaughton, Florida State University, and Piers Rawling, Florida State University: Deontology 16: Hillel Steiner, University of Manchester and British Academy: Moral Rights 17: Thomas E. Hill, Jr., University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill: Kantian Normative Ethics 18: Julia Annas, University of Arizona: Virtue Ethics 19: Virginia Held, City University of New York, Graduate School: The Ethics of Care 20: Mark Lance, Georgetown University, and Margaret Little, Georgetown University: Particularism and Anti-Theory 21: Michael DePaul, University of Notre Dame: Intuitions in Moral Inquiry 22: Gerald Dworkin, University of California, Davis: Theory, Practice, and Moral Reasoning

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5860/choice.43-5825

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

See all 732

Metadata

Venue
Choice Reviews Online
Published
2006-06-01
Volume
43
Issue
10
Pages
43-5825-43-5825
ISSN
  • 0009-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-8253
OpenAlex
W1575146746
Cited by
732
References
50
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Oxford handbook of ethical theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5860/choice.43-5825
The paper
The Oxford handbook of ethical theory. (2006). Choice Reviews Online. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-5825

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.